Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.42s
35 Misc. 2d 370 · New York Supreme Court · May 25, 1962
By order of this court dated April 16, 1962 this action was dismissed with prejudice to plaintiffs Brown and adopting the practice suggested in Van Aalten v. … Such examinations are not permitted in stockholders’ suits in this Department in the absence of a showing of special circumstances (Gearing v. Kelly, 15 A D 2d 477) and Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublished4 N.Y.S. 257 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1889
at Yo. 12 West Forty-Sixth street, Yew York city, where deponent and his family have *258 boarded; that she has closed said house, and sent away her boarders, and is evidently nearly ready to leave as aforesaid; that, at … Then I decline to answer; it is my personal business; nothing to do with Morford & Brown whatever. My reason for declining is, I cannot see that it relates to the matter in hand at all. Q.
Cited 0 timesPublished17 N.Y.S. 805 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1892
the interest of Brown, deceased. … with the terms of the agreement at any time prior to the death of Brown or his widow, without written agreement to that effect.
Cited 0 timesPublished21 N.Y. St. Rep. 978 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1889
Cited 0 timesPublished8 N.Y. St. Rep. 894 · New York Supreme Court · May 13, 1887
The validity of the title in this case depended upon adverse-possession in the plaintiffs, and the defendants were justified under the authorities (see Kip v. Hirsch, 53 N. Y. Supr. Ct.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna