Case law

Aldrich v. Brown

11 N.Y. 596 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1834

Brown v. Cromien

50 How. Pr. 192 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1875

Brown v. Bowen

16 How. Pr. 544 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1858

Brown v. Weber

24 How. Pr. 306 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1862

Royce v. Brown

3 How. Pr. 391 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1848

—that Defendant and those before him has had the peaceable use of' the road for upwards of thirty years, and that, too, by the consent and license of Jonathan Brown, the owner of said land—that Arnold Brown purchased his … farm of Jonathan Brown, and the road was then used as a road, and Jonathan Brown, when Defendant built his house, agreed with the Defendant in consideration that Defendant would build said house at the place where he did,

Brown v. Vedder

2 How. Pr. 71 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1846

Brown v. Ferguson

2 How. Pr. 128 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1846

Brown v. Danforth

9 N.Y.S. 19 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1890

These funds are the avails of property which formerly belonged to Elijah Brown. The plaintiff claims title under what has been called a “trust-deed,” made by Brown in his life-time to the defendant Wilber. … The defendants other than Wilber and Diefendorf claim such funds as legatees under the will of Brown. The trust-deed was made, executed, and acknowledged December 4, 1876. The will was executed August 26, 1879.

Barnard v. Brown

17 N.Y.S. 313 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1892

Brown, the wife of the defendant Herman B. Brown, the judgment debtor. … Brown and Mary A.

Brown v. Lawton

6 N.Y.S. 137 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1889

State v. Brown

17 Del. 286 · New York Court of General Session of the Peace · May 20, 1898

Perley v. Brown

18 N.H. 404 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Dec 15, 1846

The case made by the. plaintiff is, that he himself and the defendant, William Brown, were prosecuting in copartnership the business of manufacturing doors, blinds, sashes, and other things, and had in their possession a … Brown, with the aid of William, without the plaintiff’s consent, removed the stock from the shop to Concord; that he retained and refused to deliver it to the plaintiff, or to account for it.

Brown v. Stevens

22 N.H. 163 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Dec 15, 1850

Brown v. Jewett

18 N.H. 230 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Jul 15, 1846

Rep. 191 , Smith v. Knowlton. If the plaintiff had objected that the evidence on the part of the defendant was insufficient to raise a presumption of the death of the husband, the exception would have been well taken.

Wightman v. Brown

1 S.C. Eq. 166 · Court of Chancery of South Carolina · Jul 15, 1790

Ertel v. Brown

18 Pa. D. & C.4th 129 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County · Apr 16, 1992

BROWN, /., Plaintiff, Allen E. Ertel, has filed a motion to disqualify David R. Bahl, Esq., counsel for defendant, William Brown. … Brown, in which Mr. Brown disavows attorney Bahl’s representation of him and, specifically, Mr. Bahl’s motion for sanctions which seeks dismissal of Mr. Ertel’s action against Mr. Brown. Mr.

Commonwealth v. Brown

1 Pa. D. & C. 609 · Bucks County Court of Quarter Sessions · Jan 2, 1922

It was allowed under the provisions of art. v, § 14, of the Constitution, and the Act of April 17, 1876, P. L. 29. They do not give the defendant the right to have such an appeal tried by a jury. … NOTE. — See Com. v. Berella, 9 Westmoreland L. J. 165; contra, Com. v. Bossier, 29 Dist. B. 171. And now, to wit, Jan. 2, 1922, the judgment of the justice as to the costs is reversed and the defendant is discharged.

Brown v. Pollock

17 Pa. D. & C. 631 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Dec 29, 1931

action located in this county; that a contract was entered into between plaintiff and defendant some time in the month of April, 1931, for a baseball game to be played at Forbes Field, in the City of Pittsburgh, Pa., by the Brown

Brown v. Boardman

33 Pa. D. & C. 581 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Sep 7, 1938

Brown, the above plaintiff, is engaged in the business of selling liquid fuels at Amity Hall and Dauphin, Pa. Subsequent to the effective date of the Act of June 2,1937, P. … Discussion We feel that there is very little difference between this case and the case of The Sperry & Hutchinson Company et al. v.

Brown v. Longbottom

1 Pa. Just. L. Rep. 161 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County · Jan 26, 1903