Case law

Blattmacher v. Brown

163 Misc. 389 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1937

Bank v. Peters, 123 N. … (Williams v. Van Norden Trust Co., 104 App. Div. 251 ; Blair v. Hill, 50 id. 33; affd., 165 N. Y. 672 .)

Kinkaid v. Kipp & Brown

1 Duer 692 · The Superior Court of New York City · Apr 15, 1853

the complaint does not appear on this motion; hut the defendants answered jointly and severally, that they were at and during the times mentioned in the complaint, owners-of a line of stages or omnibuses, known as Kipp & Brown … The verification is as follows : “Solomon-Kipp and Abraham Brown, being severally duly sworn, say, each for himself, that the foregoing answer is true of his own knowledge, except so far as the same alleges a want of sufficient

Brown v. State

35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 696 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Jan 26, 1983

In Demario v. Sears Roebuck and Co. (1972), 6 Ill. … The case of Prater v. Veach (1962), 35 Ill.

Ostrander v. Brown & Stafford

15 Johns. 39 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1818

The weight of evidence clearly shows that neither of them were on board the sloop. Admitting, then, that the wharf was the place of delivery, a mere landing the goods on the wharf was no delivery. … He had notice that Stafford and Brown were the owners ; and if Mounsey and Olmstead would not take charge of the goods as consignees, he ought to have secured them on board his vessel, or in some other place of safety; and

Staker v. Brown

41 Ohio Misc. 144 · Scioto County Court of Common Pleas · Oct 23, 1974

Leach, Jr., testified that at a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals conducted January 6,1970, the then owner, William J. … The Court of Appeals of Louisana in the case of Lake Side Day Care Center v. Board of Adjustment, City of Baton Rouge (1960), 121 So. 2d 335 , had before it this specific issue.

State v. Brown

21 Del. 339 · Delaware Court of Oyer and Terminer · May 4, 1905

Spruance, J., charging the jury: Gentlemen of the jury:—The prisoner, Edward Brown, is indicted for the murder of James Lethrem on the eleventh day of June last in the town of Clayton, in Duck Creek Hundred, in this county

Burhans v. Sanford & Brown

19 Wend. 417 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1838

Sinclair v. Eldred, 4 Taunt. 7. See also Purcell v. Macnamara, 9 East, 361. But it now appears that the former action was voluntarily discontinued by the plaintiffs. … Nicholson v. Coghill, 6 Dow. & Ry. 12. Webb v. Hill, 3 Car. & Payne, 495. 1 M. & M. 253, S. C. Malice may be, and usually is inferred in these actions from the want of probable cause.

Commissioners v. Brown

26 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 377 · Belmont County Courts, Ohio · May 3, 1916

Brown. … Brown had a right to recover even if her injury was the result of the combined negligence of both the board of county commissioners and the driver of the automobile.

Hooker v. Brown

41 Va. Cir. 336 · Richmond County Circuit Court · Jan 30, 1997

In Conway v. Robinson, Case No. … In Morey v. McDonald, 36 Va. Cir. 511 (1995), this court (Wilkinson, J.) held that coming to Richmond “probably once a month to either shop in Carytown or have lunch in the city or visit Maymont Park” was not enough.

Brown v. Bristol

1 Cow. 176 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1823

(Shotwell v. Daniels, 8 John. 341 .) Motion denied.

Brown v. Wyman

59 Misc. 2d 740 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1969

The petitioner, Arlethia Brown, is on welfare and is a resident of the City of Syracuse. She has four children and her husband, James S. Brown, has disappeared. … (Smith v.

Brown v. Smith

38 Va. Cir. 484 · Southampton County Circuit Court · Mar 22, 1996

Everett Bagnell This suit involves a claim by the plaintiff, Barry Thomas Brown, an inmate in the Southampton County Jail, against three Southampton County sheriffs deputies seeking damages for a slip-and-fall accident which

Brown v. Balde

3 Lans. 283 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1870

It is true the chancellor, in Cudderback v. … (Baygot v. Boulger, 2 Duer, 160 ; People v. Laws, 3 Abbott, Pr. R., 450.)

People v. Brown

191 Misc. 2d 97 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 2, 2002

Where no statutory right of discovery is provided, no substantive right of discovery exists (s ee, Matter of Miller v Schwartz, supra; Matter of Pittari v Pirro, 258 AD2d 202 ; Matter of Brown v Appelman, 241 AD2d 279 ; Matter … (Brown v Grosso, 285 AD2d 642 , 643-644 [2d Dept 2001].)

People v. Brown

137 Misc. 2d 172 · Oswego City Court · Sep 25, 1987

Davidson v Gilon, 126 NY 147 ; see McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, *180 Statutes, §238) and that the statutes enacting regulations malum prohibitum are to be strictly construed (State of New York v Mobil Oil Corp., 38 … NY2d 460, 466 ; Matter of Asheroff v Parking Violations Bur. of Transp.

Brown v. Halsted

17 Abb. N. Cas. 197 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1885

The case of Jessup v. Hulse, 21 N. Y. 168 , does not conflict with these views. … The case of DeCamp v. Marshall, 2 Abb. Pr. N.

Brown v. Shyne

133 Misc. 306 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1928

When the judgment then rendered reached the Court of Appeals (Brown v. Shyne, 242 N. … In view of the definition by the Court of Appeals in Brown v.

Brown v. Green

46 How. Pr. 302 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1873

The board determines the existence of the indebtedness, and the finance department must see to it that proper vouchers are presented, examined and allowed. … He seems to have acted on the assumption that the credit and allowance of the board of supervisors were sufficient. In this he was in error.

Jones v. Brown

39 Va. Cir. 256 · Norfolk County Circuit Court · May 21, 1996

Ryan v. Davis, 201 Va. 79, 85 (1959). Title 14.1, Chapter 3, of the Code of Virginia authorizes the taxing of costs. … Ry. v. Kinzer, 206 Va. 175 , 181 (1965); Blake Construction Co. v. Alley, 233 Va. 31, 34 (1987). This is true even though a statute be remedial in nature. O’Connor v. Smith, 188 Va. 214, 222 (1948); Sellers v.

Brown v. Phelan

130 Misc. 590 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1927

As is said in Earle v. Earle ( 93 N. … (Bruen v. Gillet, 115 N. Y. 10 ; Croft v. Williams, 88 id. 384; Adair v. Brimmer, 74 id. 539.)