Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.37s
4 N.Y.S. 155 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1889
That was decided in Jay v. De Groot, 2 Hun, 205 , and afterwards so far followed in Tunstall v. … Riggs v. Pursell, 74 N. Y. 370 .
Cited 2 timesPublished26 N.Y.S. 951 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1893
Fischer v. Blank, 138 N. Y. 244 , 33 N. E. 1040 . The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Cited 1 timesPublished9 Misc. 2d 715 · New York County Courts · Feb 26, 1958
After proceedings taken in said City Court, the said ‘ ‘ Mary Jane Brown ” was committed to the St. Anne Institute at Albany, New York. … It is the suggestion of this court that the District Attorney send a copy of this decision and an order in conformity with same, to the said “ Mary Jane Brown”, to her mother, Mrs. ‘ ‘ Hortense Brown ’ ’, to Attorneys Quimby
Cited 2 timesPublished27 N.Y.S. 583 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1894
Green v. Green, 69 N. Y. 553 . … Cleary v. Light Co., 139 N. Y. 643 , 35 N. E. 206 . Order granting a new trial should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Cited 2 timesPublished72 Misc. 2d 237 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1972
(Brothers v. Burt, 27 N Y 2d 905; Russo v. Pacific of New York Group, 28 A D 2d 1130.) C. … (Gilbert v. Village of Larchmont, 280 App. Div. 1000 ; Woollard v. Schaffer Stores Co., 272 N. Y. 304, 311 ; Allstate Ins. Co. v. Szego, 38 A D 2d 736.) ■ A. Waste of added litigation.
Cited 2 timesPublished71 Misc. 316 · New York County Courts · Mar 15, 1911
Brown, plaintiff, in his own behalf testified. Mr. Morss shows Brown a note, and Brown says interest is $9.23. Hote offered in evidence and marked Ex. A. … Barlow v.
Cited 3 timesPublished47 Misc. 2d 288 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1965
Y. 256 ), the drawing of conflicting inferences would rest solely with the board, but having here determined that the administrative record made by the board was completely inadequate for any purpose I should have remitted … Div. 872 ; Matter of Emray Realty Corp. v. Abrams, 309 N. Y. 888 ; Matter of Rosin v. McGoldrick, 280 App. Div. 943 ; Matter of R. E. Assoc. v. McGoldrick, 280 App. Div. 202 ).
Cited 2 timesPublished33 N.Y.S. 57 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Apr 1, 1895
by Whelp to defendant was adjourned to October 19, 1892, and on that day possession of the land and building was given by the former to the latter, who, in explanation of his having given such possession, testified that Brown … Prima facie, the building was not a chattel, but became a part of and passed with the freehold (Smith v.
Cited 2 timesPublished87 Misc. 2d 403 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1976
Smith, NYLJ, March 16, 1976, p 7, col 3-6, p 8, col 1; People v Ferrara, supra; see People v Mackey, 82 Misc 2d 766 ; People *406 v Hargrove, 80 Misc 2d 317 ). … Percy, 45 AD2d 284 , affd 38 NY2d 806 ; People v Rallo, 46 AD2d 518 , affd 39 NY2d 217 ).
Cited 6 timesPublished3 How. Pr. 375 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1849
(Haynes v. The Dutchess and Orange Steam Company, 7 Cowen, 467 ; Graham’s Pr., 331, 2d ed.;) and the only relief which the party had in such a case was by motion to the court.’ (Graham’s Pr., 331; 7 Cowen, 467.)
Cited 1 timesPublished185 Misc. 329 · City of New York Municipal Court · May 25, 1945
(Skinner v. Sullivan, 112 Misc. 365 ; Matter of Blumberg, 149 App. Div. 303 ; McDermott v. Board of Police of Metropolitan Police District, 25 Barb. 635, 641 ; Matter of Sullivan, 31 Misc. 1, 4 ; Steinhardt v. … (Rathbun v. Acker, 18 Barb. 393 ; McDermott v. Board of Police, 25 id. 635; People ex rel. Niagara Bridge & C. R. R. Co. v. L. & B. R. R.
Cited 3 timesPublished77 Misc. 282 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1912
Muller v. City of Philadelphia, 114 App. Div. 138 . … Smith v. Hilton, 50 Hun, 236 , and cases cited; New York Life Ins. & Trust Co. v. Cuthbert, 87 Hun, 339 ; Van Allen v. Rogers, 5 Misc. Rep. 420 , and cases- cited.
Cited 1 timesPublished20 Del. 120 · New York Court of General Session of the Peace · Nov 14, 1902
J., charging the jury : Gentlemen of the jury:—Frank Brown, the prisoner at the bar, is charged with having shot and killed one James Gilmore, in a house back of the post office in this town, on the twenty-eighth day of May … If you believe that Frank Brown fired the pistol with the ball which killed James Gilmore and that when he did so it was in pursuance of a sedate, deliberate mind and formed design to take life or to do some great and serious
Cited 2 timesPublished65 Barb. 274 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1873
It was not competent to meet the defendant’s evidence tending to show an express agreement that absences should be deducted from the charges for board, by proof that it is the custom of hotels not to allow such deductions
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna