Case law

Brown v. Evans

39 Misc. 3d 171 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 9, 2012

(Morrissey v Brewer, 408 US at 484 ; Mayfield v Evans, 93 AD3d at 107-109 .) … Council of Teachers v Board of Coop. Educ. Servs. of Nassau County, 63 NY2d 100, 102-103 [1984]; Matter of Camacho v Kelly, 57 AD3d 297, 299 [1st Dept 2008].)

Wormser v. Brown

25 N.Y.S. 553 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1893

In November, 1892, the defendant trustees, upon notice to the plaintiffs, made an application to the said park board to rescind the resolution of said board revoking said permit; and the said board, after having heard both … defendants that no-relief could be granted to the plaintiffs because the windows had been finished, even if this action had been commenced as soon as-their construction had been begun, citing decision in case of Fire Department v.

Quereau v. Brown

17 N.Y.S. 644 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1892

Code Civil Proc. § 1021; Liegeois v. McCrackan; 22 Hun, 69 ; Rum. Pr. 236, 237; Gray v. Rothschild, 13 Civil Proc. R. 359 . … Gray v. Rothschild, *645 supra; Bank v. Bussell, 14 Abb. N. C. 99 ; Bank v. Lynch, 76 N. Y. 514 . The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion should be denied, with $10 costs.

People v. Brown

151 Misc. 712 · New York County Courts · May 16, 1934

These facts are clearly distinguishable from the facts as set forth in the opimon in People v. Jennings ( 257 N. Y. 196 ). … (See People v. Kopper, 253 N. Y. 83 .) Judgment of conviction is affirmed.

People v. Brown

115 Misc. 2d 277 · Mount Vernon City Court · Mar 2, 1982

That same issue was previously considered by this court in People v Lane, (Docket No. 3124-81 A) and in a decision dated February 8,1982 it was disposed of as follows: “That contention is rejected by the Court. … Realty Co. v Department of Bldgs, of City of N. Y., 26 NY2d 538 .) We have no such situation here.

Mandle v. Brown

5 Misc. 2d 115 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1956

V, § 6). … The case of Matter of Williams v. Morton ( 297 N. Y. 328 ) appears to be definite authority to the contrary.

People v. Brown

32 Misc. 2d 846 · New York County Courts · Feb 9, 1962

(People v. Loria, 10 N Y 2d 368, 372.) The validity of an arrest depends upon the existence of probable cause to make the arrest. … (Byars v. United States, 273 U. S. 28, 29 ; Henry v. United States, 361 U. S. 98, 104 .)

Mapes v. Brown

14 Abb. N. Cas. 94 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1884

irregular ; but I see no reason for striking it out, inasmuch as the defendants who make this motion retained the same from the 14th to the 22d of March, and thereby, I think, lost their right to object thereto (Hollister v.

Leffel v. Brown

80 Ohio Law. Abs. 373 · Clark County Court of Common Pleas · Jan 17, 1959

Foster v. Scarff, 15 Oh St 534. (Emphasizing throughout this decision is by the Court.) … Otworth v. Bays, 155 Oh St 366. These citations suggest the yardstick and the rule to be applied in the determination of the issues in the instant cases.

Brown v. Reed

10 Misc. 2d 8 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1957

(Fisher v. New Yorker Staats-Zeitung, 114 App. Div. 824 [2d Dept.].) … (Roberts v. Pratt, 174 Misc. 585 .)

Rosier v. Brown

158 Misc. 2d 748 · Rochester City Court · Aug 2, 1993

Prods, v Consolidated Edison Co., 99 AD2d 508, citing GoodmanMarks Assocs. v Westburg Post Assocs., 70 AD2d 145 ). … Corp. v Wager Constr. Corp., 57 AD2d 707 ; Nepco Forged Prods, v Consolidated Edison Co., supra; Fitzpatrick, Jr. Constr. Corp. v County of Suffolk, 138 AD2d 446 ; Facilities Dev. Corp. v Miletta, supra.)

Brown v. Dinsmoor

3 N.H. 103 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Sep 15, 1824

People v. Brown

24 N.Y. Crim. 53 · New York County Courts · Oct 15, 1909

In People v. Soloman, 57 Misc. … Hill v. People, 20 N. Y. 363 .

Brown v. Snyder

40 Pa. D. & C.2d 286 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County · Jan 24, 1966

any other citizen: Dorris v. … Ellis, Inc. v.

Brown v. Einbinder

10 Misc. 2d 257 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1958

With respect to the third-party action, the applicable law is stated in Melcher v. Ocean Acc. & Guar. Corp. ( 226 N. … Defendants’ reliance on Haas Tobacco Co. v. American Fidelity Co. ( 226 N. Y. 343 ) is untenable here.

Brown v. Clark

3 Johns. 443 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1808

This court, therefore, has power to award a venire de novo, returnable at a circuit court, as was done in the case of Grant v. … Astle, (Doug. 722.) and as was admitted to be the rule, by Lord Mansfield, in the case of Harwood v. Goodright. (Cowper, 89, 90.) The case of Davis v.

Brown v. Pollard

66 Ohio Law. Abs. 253 · Madison County Court of Common Pleas · May 27, 1953

Birrell of the Common Pleas Court of Trumbull County, who said in the case of Capron v.

Goodman v. Brown

164 Misc. 145 · City of New York Municipal Court · Sep 1, 1937

He is bound by what he should have seen (Weigand v. United Traction Co., 221 N. Y. 39, 42 ), and this, even though his failure to see may have been due to defective vision. … (Knapp v. Barrett, 216 N. Y. 226, 230 .)

Goldsmith v. Brown

176 Misc. 257 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1941

Tuckerman v. Brown

17 Barb. 191 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1853

Cutler v. Winne, ( 6 Pick. 335 ,) cited in the opinion of the judge who *193 tried the case, is to this effect. (See also Thompson v. Hamilton, 12 Pick. 424 . Taggard v. Loring, 16 Mass. Rep. 336 . Reynolds v. … Manter v. Holmes, 10 Metcalf, 402.) The judgment at the circuit was right, and should be affirmed. [Albany General Term, September 5, 1853. Watson, Wright and Harris, Justices.]