Case law

Board of County Commissioners v. Coffman

18 Ohio C.C. 254 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Nov 15, 1897

By it boards of county commissioners are made liable in their official capacity for negligence or carelessness in keeping a bridge in repair. … The board being created for the benefit of political society, the duty was imposed when the board was created, and has existed since such board became a part of our system of local government.

Littleton v. Board of Infirmary Directors

18 Ohio C.C. 891 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Apr 15, 1894

In this case plaintiff was appointed in May, 1883, by the defendant board, superintendent of the infirmary for one year, at a salary of $700, and $250 for his wife as matron. … In January, 1894, the board removed Littleton as superintendent, and appointed defendant Irvin as superintendent; thereupon an action was begun by Littleton for an injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with

Joyva Corp. v. Board of Assessors

82 Misc. 2d 466 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1975

Lavere v. Board of Zoning Appeals

72 Misc. 2d 493 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 20, 1971

The language of that section provides, in substance, that any person or persons aggrieved by any decision of the Board of Appeals may, upon proper cause shown, review any determination or decision of the Board of Appeals … (Matter of Lido Beach Civic Assoc, v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 13 A D 2d 1030; see 67 N. Y. jur., Zoning & Planning Laws, § 429.)

Peel v. Board of Metropolitan Police

44 Barb. 91 · New York Supreme Court · May 2, 1865

The moneys were given for a particular purpose, not to the board of police but to Mr. Belmont, to be distributed among the police force. When the board of police agreed to accept the fund from Mr. … The 65th section provides that the board may permit members to receive rewards, and makes it a cause of removal for any member to receive any such reward or present without notice to the board.

Board of Education v. Richmond

137 N.Y.S. 62 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1912

Ham v. Mayor, 70 N. Y. 459 . But the supply of water to the public schools is a public necessity and should not be interfered with, even though it should be the duty of the board of education to pay water rents. … Johnson v. Barrows, 140 App. Div. 24 , 124 N. Y. Supp. 270 , affirmed 204 N. Y. 664 , 97 N. E. 1113 ; Board of Water Com’rs v. Corning, 140 App. Div. 11 , 124 N. Y. Supp. 268 , affirmed 201 N. Y. 570 , 95 N.

Gormley v. Board of Education

129 N.Y.S. 153 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1911

The case of Moore v. Board of Education, 121 App. Div. 862 , 106 N. Y. … In Wood v. Board of Education, 59 Misc. Rep. 605 , 112 N. Y.

Kessler v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

24 Pa. D. & C.2d 418 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Dec 29, 1960

In Elkins-Rydal Company v. Brigham, 69 Montg. 185 (1952), this court was emphatic in stating that no vested right existed for an indefinite period to develop the subdivision in accordance with the plan. … Order And now, December 29, 1960, the decision of the Zoning Board of Adjustment of Horsham Township is affirmed.

Scharnhorst v. Zoning Board of Appeals

28 Ohio Misc. 37 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Mar 29, 1971

The Supreme Court of Ohio has held that a property owner has no vested right in zoning as it is; that such zoning can be amended for the public good (Curtiss v. Cleveland, 166 Ohio St. 509 ).

Klingbeil v. Board of Liquor Control

79 Ohio Law. Abs. 193 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Feb 18, 1957

Weighing the evidence as we are required to do, under the case of Andrews v. Board of Liquor Control, 164 Oh St 275, we conclude that the liquid in question containing properties of ethyl alcohol mix, was not 3.2 beer. … C., and Regulation 49 of the Board of Liquor Control.' Insofar as that claim is concerned, we adopt the conclusion which we reached in the case of B. P. O. of Elks, Cincinnati Lodge No. 5 v.

Thomas v. Board of County Commissioners

5 Ohio N.P. 449 · Clark County Probate Court · Aug 15, 1898

Stephan v. State Veterinary Medical Board

87 Ohio Law. Abs. 370 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Feb 5, 1960

v. … In the case of Hart v.

Silverstein v. Board of Liquor Control

67 Ohio Law. Abs. 1 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · May 15, 1953

If his decision on an application for renewal is not satisfactory, then the applicant may appeal to the Board of Liquor Control and, if necessary, to this Court. … Until both the Director and the Board have had an opportunity to pass on an application for renewal, this Court has no jurisdiction in the matter. See State ex rel. Jones v. Bryant, Director, 159 Oh St 59.

Redfern v. Board of County Commissioners

18 Ohio C.C. 233 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Dec 15, 1898

This is^'to be settled by the joint boards of the two counties at a joint meeting of such boards. … if the officer report favorable to the improvement, then said board gives notice and forwards a copy of said report to the board of the other county, and it then becomes the duty of the boards of both counties to meet in

Clark v. Board of County Commissioners

14 Ohio C.C. 349 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jun 15, 1897

For instance, in a suit of Smith & Jones v. Brown & White, he would enter up: “Smith v. Brown; Jones v. Brown; Smith v. White; Jones v. … And, applying a principle which is very well stated in this case of The Com’rs. of Butler Co. v.

Abel v. Board of County Commissioners

6 Ohio N.P. 349 · Hardin County Court of Common Pleas · Jul 1, 1898

express provisions of sec. 4447 has limited the authority of county commissioners so far as improving rivers are concerned to “straightening, widening, deepening or changing the same, while the same seotion gives to such boards … Judgment against the Board of County Ccmmissic ners for costs.

Burkart v. Board of Fire Commissioners

28 Misc. 2d 64 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1960

Such board of fire commissioners 4É ’S £ £ 11. … The powers and duties of the Board of Fire Commissioners are further defined by section 209-1 of the General Municipal Law which reads as follows: £ £ § 209-1.

Bush v. Board of Supervisors

13 Misc. 707 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1895

Brown, J. … Perkins v. Milford, 59 Maine, 315 ; Moulton v. Raymond, 60 id. 121; Freeland v. Hastings, 92 Mass. (10 Allen) 570 ; Mead v. Acton, 139 Mass. 341 ; Kelly v. Marshall, 69 Penn. St. 319; Ferguson v.

Gilbert v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

6 N.J. Misc. 405 · New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau · Jul 1, 1928

Brown, and testimony having been taken, I do find and determine as follows: Petitioner, Ovid Gilbert, was employed as a porter and handy man at the Bergen Pines Isolation Hospital of Bergen county, located at Oradell, New

Conmar Builders, Inc. v. Board of Appeals

43 Misc. 2d 577 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1964

Where this right is specified in the ordinance, the court on many occasions has upheld the inherent power of a Board of Appeals to impose reasonable conditions (Matter of Hopkins v. … Yacht Club v. Board of Appeals, 32 Misc 2d 677 ) and they must be sufficiently clear and definite so that the permittee is not left in doubt as to the extent of the use permitted (Matter of Pearson v.