Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.52s
14 Daly 456 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Apr 2, 1888
appeal, or whether to give judgment absolute against the appellant, where an appeal is taken to this court from an order of the General Term of the City Court that grants a new trial, may be found in the cases of Tisdale v. … Murray ( 9 Daly 446 ), Sands v. Crooke ( 46 N. Y. 569 ), and Harris v. Burdett ( 73 N.
Cited 2 timesPublished37 Misc. 367 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1902
It consists mainly of allegations of fact giving a history of the title, and of claims and disputes over the land in question for many years between various persons (Mitnacht v. Hawthorne, 31 Misc. Rep. 378 ). … Pleading has almost become a lost art in this part of the state, and it seems very difficult to restore it (Schroeder v. Post, 3 App. Div. 411 ).
Cited 2 timesPublished24 N.Y.S. 61 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1893
In Clarkson v.. Edes, 4 Cow. 470 , it was held, that when by the terms of a charter party a vessel is to be navigated at the expense .of the owners, they must be deemed to be the owners in possession. … The Hine v. Trevor, 4 Wall. 555 ; The Belfast, 7 Wall. 625 ; Town of Pelham v. The R. F. Woolsey, 3 Fed. Rep. 457.
Cited 4 timesPublished123 Misc. 2d 983 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1984
, 37 AD2d 866 ; People v Bolla, 112 Misc 2d 703 ; People v Bracey, 98 Misc 2d 346 ). … Malloy v Hogan, 378 US 1 ; People v Vail, 90 AD2d 917 ; People v Bay, 76 AD2d 592 , app dsmd 54 NY2d 808 ; People v Andino, 80 Misc 2d 155 ), all for the rule that statements obtained by any direct or implied promise, however
Cited 3 timesPublished15 Ohio C.C. Dec. 130 · Lucas Circuit Court · Mar 13, 1903
In Commonwealth v. … The case of Brown v. State, 33 Neb. 354 [ 50 N. W. Rep. 154 ], is directly in point.
Cited 1 timesPublished29 N.Y.S. 652 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1894
Bertles v. Nunan, 92 N. Y. 152 . … Pitcher v. Hennessey, 48 N. Y. 415 ; Born v. Schrenkeisen, 110 N. Y. 55 , 17 N. E, 339; Marsh v. McNair, 48 Hun, 117 .
Cited 3 timesPublished101 Misc. 625 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1917
See People v. Havnor, 149 N. Y. 195 . … See People v. Sturges, 27 App. Div. 387 ; affd., 156 N. Y. 580 ; State Board of Pharmacy v. Bellinger, 138 App. Div. 12 .
Cited 4 timesPublished17 Barb. 145 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1853
Smith v. Randall, 3 Id. 495.) … (People v. Allen, 6 Wend. 486 . Gale v. Mead, 2 Denio, 160 .)
Cited 3 timesPublished133 Misc. 2d 929 · Mount Vernon City Court · Nov 17, 1986
In People v Bernard ( 129 Misc 2d 1083 ), the court decided not to apply the logic of section 30.30 (5) (c) as applied to reductions from felonies to class A misdemeanors, to the superseding from a class A misdemeanor to … This court feels that, following the logic expressed in People v Lomax ( 50 NY2d 351 ) and People v Bernard (supra), the People must declare readiness for trial within 30 days from the date of the original accusatory, after
Cited 8 timesPublished29 Del. 179 · New York Court of General Session of the Peace · Feb 10, 1916
John Fred Brown, the defendant is charged in this case with obstructing a public road in this county leading from Horsey’s Cross Road to Hill’s Comer.
Cited 4 timesPublished10 N.Y.S. 53 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1890
Hopkins v. Lott, 111 N. Y. 577 , 19 N. E. Rep. 273; Pursell v. Fry, 19 Hun, 595 ; Harrison v. Ayers, 18 Hun, 336 . … Ex’rs, 317; Willcox v. Smith, 26 Barb. 355 .” 5 N. Y. Supp. 489 .
Cited 2 timesPublished105 N.Y.S. 196 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1907
Peck v. Goodberlett, 109 N. Y. 180 , 16 N. … Nor can it be left to a majority of or an unanimous vote of the enrolling board to say whether or not a man may be enrolled.
Cited 3 timesPublished203 Misc. 1027 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1952
Div. 615 ; Matter of Mounting & Finishing Co. v. McGoldrick, 294 N. Y. 104 ). Its determination is to be accepted by the court “ if it has 1 warrant in the record ’ and a reasonable basis in law.” (Board v. … Corp. v. United States, 307 U. S. 125, 146 ; Matter of Mounting & Finishing Co. v. McGoldrick, supra; Matter of Katz’s Delicatessen v. O’Connell, 302 N. Y. 286 ; Matter of Frissell v. McGoldrick, 300 N. Y. 370 .)
Cited 2 timesPublished5 Lans. 78 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1871
It was held in Durell v. Mosher (8 J. … Such I understand to be the view of Lord Ellenbokough in Severin v. Keppell (4 Esp., 156). There plaintiff delivered plate to defendant (a silversmith) to put glasses in.
Cited 3 timesPublished168 Misc. 2d 923 · Rochester City Court · Jun 17, 1996
Corp. v New York State Liq. Auth., 58 Misc 2d 217 ; see also, Niesig v Team I, 76 NY2d 363, 370 ; People v White, 115 AD2d 313 ; Nestlerrode v Federal Ins. … Bing, 76 NY2d 331 [questioning of defendant]; People v Rogers, 48 NY2d 167 [same]; People v Hobson, 39 NY2d 479 [same]; People v Suarez, 167 Misc 2d 189 [service of supporting deposition on defendant]; People v Rossi, 154
Cited 1 timesPublished173 Misc. 2d 542 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 8, 1997
He cited People v Jones ( 62 AD2d 356 ) and People v Valderama ( 161 AD2d 820 ) in which the court did not allow the People to introduce, on their direct case, the amount of money found on a defendant who was charged with … The court initially ruled that the money found on one of the defendants could not come in during direct examination by the People based upon case law prevailing in the Second Department (People v Edwards, 199 AD2d 334 ).
Cited 1 timesPublished24 Misc. 235 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1898
There was no error in this (Prince v. Brooklyn Eagle, 16 Misc. Rep. 186 ; Ullrich v. N. Y. Press Co., 23 Misc. Rep. 168 ; Cady v. Brooklyn Union Co., 23 Misc. Rep. 409 ; Shanks v. Stumpf, 23 Misc. Rep. 264 ). … Evidence in mitigation has to do only with the question of smart money (Millard v. Brown, 35 N. Y. 297 , and cases supra). , . The motion for a new trial on the minutes is denied. Motion denied.
Cited 3 timesPublished125 Misc. 2d 132 · New York County Courts · Jun 25, 1984
California, 342 US 165 ; People v Pobliner, 32 NY2d 356, 365 ). … This finding conforms with Judge Kevin Thomas Duffy’s observation that “the medical records raise a possibility that Brown suffered a second trauma after his arrest.” (United States v Shakur, 560 F Supp 318, 333, n 19 .)
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna