Case law

Wild v. Board of Supervisors

9 How. Pr. 315 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1854

The board of supervisors, and not the individual officers who in their collective capacity constitute that board, represent the body corporate known as the county. … be brought against the board of supervisors thereof.

Board of School Inspectors v. State

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 109 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Dec 5, 1928

Justice Leech delivered the opinion of the court: This claim is filed by the Board of School Inspectors of the City of Peoria, Illinois, setting forth that on June 30th, 1925, in the City of Peoria and County of Peoria in … It appears from the declaration that the plaintiff pursuant to “An Act to enable school directors and boards of education to establish and maintain classes and schools for delinquent children committed by courts of competent

Accomack County School Board v. Shields

39 Va. Cir. 411 · Accomack County Circuit Court · Jul 2, 1996

, may proceed to resolve a dispute between the Board on the one hand and Barry E. … The School Board’s position is that the tenant can look to Shields for relief.

Ryszka v. Board of Education

126 Misc. 622 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1926

The board of education above referred to had charge of School No. 2 in said city of Lackawanna. … (Smith v. City of Albany, 61 N. Y. 444, 446 ; People ex rel. Schenectady Ill. Co. v. Bd. Suprs., 166 App. Div. 758 .)

Ogden v. Public School Employes' Retirement Board

27 Pa. D. & C.2d 151 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Jul 17, 1961

Herman, J., This is an appeal from an adjudication of the Public School Employes’ Retirement Board denying to appellants any of Benjamin V. … Neither Dom v. State Employes’ Retirement Board, 345 Pa. 489 (1942), nor Hargest v.

Basmajian v. Board of Education

122 Misc. 530 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1924

The case of Jaked v. Board of Education, 198 App. Div. 113 ; affd., 234 N. Y. 591 , answers the first question in the negative and indicates that the question of contributory negligence was properly for the jury.

Brown v. Columbus, Newark & Zanesville Electric Ry. Co.

6 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 170 · Licking County Court of Common Pleas · Sep 15, 1907

Lizzie Brown, the plaintiff, died after bringing the suit. The testimony shows, or tends to show, it so satisfied the court, that she died as a result of the injuries received. … Coal Co. v. Smith), is a suit brought to recover for injuries sustained by Smith while working in a coal mine. If is an action very similar to the one at bar.

L. S. & M. S. Ry. Co. v. Brown

9 Ohio Cir. Dec. 37 · Lucas Circuit Court · Jul 1, 1898

Railroad Co. v. Robbins, 35 O. S., 531; Railroad Co. v. Williams, supra." … In Railroad Co. v. O’Hara, 50 O.

Soros v. Board of Appeals of Southampton

50 Misc. 2d 205 · New York Supreme Court · May 2, 1966

(Matter of Soros v. Board of Appeals of Vil. of Southampton, 24 A D 2d 705.) The second variance application was heard on and off until November 30, 1965. … Matter of Midgett v. Schermerhorn, 24 A D 2d 572). There is merely a rather unfortunate series of events here for the board to consider in reaching a decision (Matter of Badish v. O’Regan, 212 N. Y. S. 2d 632).

Buckbee v. Board of Education

51 Misc. 295 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1906

Steinson v. Board of Education, 165 N. Y. 431 . The element of the term of the contract is, therefore^ clear. … Callahan v. Board of Education, 174 N.

Mason v. Board of Trustees

50 Misc. 40 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1906

Sander v. State of New York, 182 N. Y. 400 . … Tice v. Atlantic Construction Co., 52 App. Div. 284 .

Greenwald v. Community School Board No. 27

69 Misc. 2d 238 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1972

This holding was in accord with the decision in Matter of Butler v. Allen (29 A D 2d 799). … This not only overlooks *242 a long series of court decisions following the doctrine of Hecht v. Monaghan, 307 N.

Town of Greenburgh v. Board of Supervisors

49 Misc. 2d 116 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1966

Rockefeller, 45 Misc 2d 778 ; Shilbury v. Board of Supervisors, Sullivan County, 46 Misc 2d 837 ; Augostini v. Lasky, 46 Misc 2d 1058 ). It must also be applied here. … Platt v. Eilert, 283 N. Y. 770 ; People ex rel. Clancy v. Supervisors, 139 N. Y. 524 ).

Boyce v. Board of Supervisors

43 Misc. 297 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1904

The board of health took no action but its chairman did take an active part. A board of health has nothing to do with a case of individual sickness but is- solicitous as to the public health. … The president of. the board of health, without the authority of the board, recognized the emergency and necessity for action, and perhaps by reason of the fact that the sheriff was not ready to commit himself or the county

Delea v. Board of Education

86 Misc. 988 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1976

(See Cirillo v Board of Educ., 66 Misc 2d 749 .) Respondents are the board of education and Gerald F. Gorman, its district principal and chief executive officer. … (See Matter of Lawson v Board of Educ., 35 AD2d 878 , app dsmd 404 US 907 ; Matter of Maslinoff v Central School Dist. No. 1, 67 Misc 2d 149 .)

Elford v. Pension Board

67 Pa. D. & C. 369 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Jul 21, 1948

As far as the amended portion is concerned, it takes effect as of the passage of the act: Commonwealth v. Repplier Coal Co., 348 Pa. 372 ; Bethlehem School Dist. Appeal, 351 Pa. 433 ; Spain’s Estate, 327 Pa. 226 -228.

Alexandria Park Ass'n v. County Board

4 Va. Cir. 454 · Arlington County Circuit Court · Nov 15, 1977

It has been in operation since about 1917, pursuant to special permits issued by the former Board of Supervisors, and cemetery lots have been sold continuously since that time.

Brown v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

95 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 621 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1895

Cumberland County Welfare Board v. Roberts

139 N.J. Super. 126 · Cumberland County Superior Court · Jan 23, 1976

Prindable v. New York Cent. R. Co., 400 Ill. 507 , 81 N. E. 2d 201 (Sup. Ct. 1948); Winter Haven v. State, 125 Fla. 392 , 170 So. 100 (Sup. Ct. 1936) Quincy v. Sturhahn, 18 Ill. 2d 604 , 165 N. E. 2d 271 (Sup. … Olmstead v. United States, 277 U. S. 438, 470 , 48 S. Ct. 564 , 72 L. Ed. 944 (1928). The motion of the board for a writ of execution is denied since the “judgment” is no longer a valid lien upon realty.

State Board of Pharmacy v. Weinstein

33 Ohio Misc. 2d 25 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · May 20, 1987

On April 24, 1986, a hearing was held at the State Pharmacy Board, 655 Front Street, Columbus, Ohio in response to appellant’s request. On June 9, 1986, ap-pellee issued an order under R.C. … Appellee further declared that this twelve-month suspension would be suspended on the condition that appellant not violate any drug laws or board rules.