Case law

Moore v. Board of Education

190 Misc. 1036 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1947

(People v. Santoro, 229 N. Y. 277, 281 ; Matter of Meyer, 209 N. Y. 386 .) … (Matter of General Reinsurance Corp. v. Pink, 269 N.

Elford v. Pension Board

67 Pa. D. & C. 369 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Jul 21, 1948

As far as the amended portion is concerned, it takes effect as of the passage of the act: Commonwealth v. Repplier Coal Co., 348 Pa. 372 ; Bethlehem School Dist. Appeal, 351 Pa. 433 ; Spain’s Estate, 327 Pa. 226 -228.

Brown v. New York State Teachers Retirement System

48 Misc. 2d 805 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1965

(Birn baum v. New York State Teachers’ Retirement System, 4 Misc 2d 356, mod. on other grounds 3 A D 2d 815, revd. on other grounds 5 N Y 2d 1; Matter of Day v. Mruk, 283 App. Div., 233 , affd. 307 N. Y. 349 .) … Further, under section 3 of article Y of the Constitution the Legislature has the power to abolish the Retirement Board and transfer its powers and functions to another department, officer, board or commission subject only

Daley v. Board of Estimate

186 Misc. 905 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1946

with its opinion (Matter of Daley v. … (Weimer v. Bunbury, *910 30 Mich., 201 .) This' great guaranty is always and everywhere present to protect the citizen' against' arbitrary interferencé with these sacred rights.” (Stuart v. Palmer, 74 N.

McGraw v. State Board of Control

4 Ct. Cl. 178 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Oct 20, 1948

Subsequently, and after the workmen’s compensation appeal board had affirmed the action of the commission, she filed her claim in this court alleging, among other matters, that a wrong diagnosis had been made of her husband … Doctor William Paul Elkin, a member of the West Virginia Silicosis Medical Board and an expert in radiology, having devoted the last ten years exclusively to x-ray work and having had occasion during that time or period to

Rothenberg v. Board of Regents

185 Misc. 246 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1945

Division which remitted the matter to the Board of Regents ( 267 App. … (Myers v. Bethlehem Corp., 303 U. S. 41 , 51.) It is not for this court to apprehend what determination the Board of Regents will make. It cannot say whether it will be favorable or unfavorable to the petitioner.

Brown Strober Building Supply Corp. v. Living House, Inc.

107 Misc. 2d 294 · Suffolk County District Court · Dec 4, 1980

Moon Raker Construction, Inc., deposited this check in its account with National Bank of North America without the indorsement of Brown Strober. … (Dynalectron, supra, p 869; see Ryland Group v Gwinnett County Bank, 151 Ga App 148.) This court agrees with the reasoning of the Federal court in Dynalectron Corp. v Union First Nat. Bank (supra).

Angello v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services

80 Misc. 2d 472 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1975

Because of the pos *473 sible impact the decision might have on Bess Dusinherre it was ordered that she be given notice of the proceedings (Matter of Dreyfuss v. Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. … whose programs are taken over by the board or boards of cooperative educational services within the tenure area of the position shall be discontinued.”

Guerriero v. Board of Contract & Supply

60 Misc. 2d 22 · New York Supreme Court · May 12, 1969

Hudson-Harlem Co. v. Walker, 282 N. Y. 400 ; Matter of Levy v. Board of Stds. & Appeals, 267 N. Y. 347 ; Matter of Diocese of Rochester v. Planning Bd. of Town of Brighton, 1 N Y 2d 508; Matter of Kayfield Constr. … Since the board had the information before it, we cannot say the action of the board is without some reasonable basis.” (Matter of Kayfield Constr. Corp. v. Morris, 15 A D 2d 373, 379.)

Wild v. Board of Supervisors

9 How. Pr. 315 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1854

The board of supervisors, and not the individual officers who in their collective capacity constitute that board, represent the body corporate known as the county. … be brought against the board of supervisors thereof.

Board of School Inspectors v. State

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 109 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Dec 5, 1928

Justice Leech delivered the opinion of the court: This claim is filed by the Board of School Inspectors of the City of Peoria, Illinois, setting forth that on June 30th, 1925, in the City of Peoria and County of Peoria in … It appears from the declaration that the plaintiff pursuant to “An Act to enable school directors and boards of education to establish and maintain classes and schools for delinquent children committed by courts of competent

Accomack County School Board v. Shields

39 Va. Cir. 411 · Accomack County Circuit Court · Jul 2, 1996

, may proceed to resolve a dispute between the Board on the one hand and Barry E. … The School Board’s position is that the tenant can look to Shields for relief.

Ryszka v. Board of Education

126 Misc. 622 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1926

The board of education above referred to had charge of School No. 2 in said city of Lackawanna. … (Smith v. City of Albany, 61 N. Y. 444, 446 ; People ex rel. Schenectady Ill. Co. v. Bd. Suprs., 166 App. Div. 758 .)

Basmajian v. Board of Education

122 Misc. 530 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1924

The case of Jaked v. Board of Education, 198 App. Div. 113 ; affd., 234 N. Y. 591 , answers the first question in the negative and indicates that the question of contributory negligence was properly for the jury.

Brown v. Columbus, Newark & Zanesville Electric Ry. Co.

6 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 170 · Licking County Court of Common Pleas · Sep 15, 1907

Lizzie Brown, the plaintiff, died after bringing the suit. The testimony shows, or tends to show, it so satisfied the court, that she died as a result of the injuries received. … Coal Co. v. Smith), is a suit brought to recover for injuries sustained by Smith while working in a coal mine. If is an action very similar to the one at bar.

L. S. & M. S. Ry. Co. v. Brown

9 Ohio Cir. Dec. 37 · Lucas Circuit Court · Jul 1, 1898

Railroad Co. v. Robbins, 35 O. S., 531; Railroad Co. v. Williams, supra." … In Railroad Co. v. O’Hara, 50 O.

Soros v. Board of Appeals of Southampton

50 Misc. 2d 205 · New York Supreme Court · May 2, 1966

(Matter of Soros v. Board of Appeals of Vil. of Southampton, 24 A D 2d 705.) The second variance application was heard on and off until November 30, 1965. … Matter of Midgett v. Schermerhorn, 24 A D 2d 572). There is merely a rather unfortunate series of events here for the board to consider in reaching a decision (Matter of Badish v. O’Regan, 212 N. Y. S. 2d 632).

Del Rosso v. Board of Elections

22 Misc. 2d 99 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1959

The returns produced by the respondent Board of Elections show that in the 8th Election District, petitioner Muckey received 7 votes; that there was 1 void ballot; and that her opponent received 15 more votes than did Muckey

Greenwald v. Community School Board No. 27

69 Misc. 2d 238 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1972

This holding was in accord with the decision in Matter of Butler v. Allen (29 A D 2d 799). … This not only overlooks *242 a long series of court decisions following the doctrine of Hecht v. Monaghan, 307 N.

Town of Greenburgh v. Board of Supervisors

49 Misc. 2d 116 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1966

Rockefeller, 45 Misc 2d 778 ; Shilbury v. Board of Supervisors, Sullivan County, 46 Misc 2d 837 ; Augostini v. Lasky, 46 Misc 2d 1058 ). It must also be applied here. … Platt v. Eilert, 283 N. Y. 770 ; People ex rel. Clancy v. Supervisors, 139 N. Y. 524 ).