Case law

Breen v. Board of Trustees

190 Misc. 661 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1947

The retirement was based upon a certificate by the Medical Board that petitioner was disqualified physically for the performance of his duties in the uniformed forces. … Bridges v. Adamson ( 173 App. Div. 773 , affd. 219 N. Y. 570 ).

State Board of Undertakers v. Jones

65 Pa. D. & C. 197 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Jun 30, 1948

L. 485, 63 PS §478j, appeals to this court are heard upon the record certified to the court by the board. … In passing, it should be noted that the only action of the board before us at this time is that from which appellant has now appealed — namely, the board’s denial of his petition to take the examination for licensure.

Herman v. State Board of Pharmacy

27 Ohio Misc. 86 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · Feb 18, 1971

Herman has been a registered pharacist for 20 years, licensed by the State Board of Pharmacy. … Now, can the Pharmacy Board suspend his license solely because on two occasions, once in 1965 and later in 1970, he entered pleas of nolo contendere in the U. S.

Thomas v. Board of County Commissioners

5 Ohio N.P. 453 · Clark County Probate Court · Aug 15, 1898

The legislature might have made the finding of the board of county commissioners conclusive upon this matter. … Wright v. Birch-field, 3rd Ohio, 53). The conduct of this juror was reprehensible, but evinced no bad intention”.

Nye v. Board of Co. Commissioners

24 Ohio Law. Abs. 598 · Summit County Probate Court · Aug 5, 1937

Danasher, special master commissioner, heretofore appointed .by this court to hear said cause, on the petition on appeal from an order of the board of county commissioners of Summit County, Ohio, and the demurrer filed by

Kanter v. Board of Zoning Appeals

83 Ohio Law. Abs. 17 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Jan 28, 1960

.: This case comes before this Court on appeal from the ruling of The Board of Zoning Appeals denying the appellants the right to construct an additional ten trailer sites on the real estate owned by the appellants. … In the case of State, ex rel., v. E.

Peale & Bro. v. Board of Education

12 Ohio C.C. 266 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1896

That in fact the paper was never laid before the Board at any meeting, by plaintiff, the clerk or said superintendent, and no formal act of transfer of the contract was ever made by any vote of the Board or building committee … We are of the opinion that the Board did not have such right.

Littleton v. Board of Infirmary Directors

9 Ohio Cir. Dec. 850 · Erie Circuit Court · Apr 15, 1894

In this case plaintiff was appointed in May, 1888, by the defendant board, superintendent of the infirmary for one year, at a salary of $700, and $250 for his wife as-matron. … In January, 1894, the board removed Eittleton as superintendent, and appointed defendant Irvin as superintendent ; thereupon an action was begun by Eittleton for an injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with

Mayhew v. Town Board of Marcy

27 N.Y.S. 1117 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1894

Bemis v. Board of Education

171 Misc. 957 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 16, 1939

(Matter of Carrow v. Board of Education, 272 N. Y. 341 .) The word “ holding ” in the statute includes a probationary period as well as a permanent one. (People ex rel. Zieger v. Whitehead, 99 Misc. 578 .) … (Matter of Seeley v. Stevens, 190 N. Y. 158, 162 .) This the Legislature had a right to do. (Matter of Stutzbach v. Coler, 168 N. Y. 416 .) Judge Crane, writing the opinion for the court in Matter of Clancy v.

Lamar v. Board of Education

170 Misc. 27 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1938

(Matter of Jaffe v. Board of Education, 265 N. Y. 160, 164 .) Furthermore, the petition does not allege that any vacancies exist and the answer affirmatively alleges that none exist at the present time. … (Matter of Phillips v. Kaplan, 266 N. Y. 514 ; Matter of Williams v. Pyrke, 233 App. Div. 345 .)

Brigode v. State Board of Education

4 Ct. Cl. 16 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 23, 1947

The above claim grows out of facts involving a county board of education, and in accordance with our opinions heretofore rendered in similar cases or claims, we again hold that we are without jurisdiction, and reaffirm our

McNeil v. State Board of Control

4 Ct. Cl. 65 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jul 22, 1947

Steele Trotter, a member of the board, without any formal board action in the premises, but motivated wholly by a humanitarian impulse, arranged for the woman to be transferred to the Fairmont Emergency Hospital. … This fact was communicated to the board of control, but Dr.

McGraw v. State Board of Control

5 Ct. Cl. 14 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 25, 1949

An appeal from the foregoing order was taken to the workmen’s compensation appeal board, but the commissioner’s ruling was affirmed by that board, by an order to that effect entered on May 9, 1947.

Brown Strober Building Supply Corp. v. Living House, Inc.

107 Misc. 2d 294 · Suffolk County District Court · Dec 4, 1980

Moon Raker Construction, Inc., deposited this check in its account with National Bank of North America without the indorsement of Brown Strober. … (Dynalectron, supra, p 869; see Ryland Group v Gwinnett County Bank, 151 Ga App 148.) This court agrees with the reasoning of the Federal court in Dynalectron Corp. v Union First Nat. Bank (supra).

Burk v. Loudoun County School Board

31 Va. Cir. 426 · Loudoun County Circuit Court · Sep 7, 1993

Dunbar v. Gym of America, 493 P.2d 660 , 50 A.L.R. 3d 992 (1972). … Nor is the holding in the case of Tazewell County School Board v. Gillenwater, 241 Va. 166 (1991), applicable in this case.

Corder v. Loudoun County School Board

17 Va. Cir. 379 · Loudoun County Circuit Court · Nov 1, 1989

Petitioner was employed by the County School Board of Loudoun County ("School Board") as a school bus driver for the 1988-89 school year. … Carroll Laycock, Chairman of the Loudoun County School Board, sent a letter outlining the school board’s position to petitioner’s counsel. Finally, on October 9, 1989, Dr.

People ex rel. Brown v. Sheriff

2 Ill. Cir. Ct. 270 · Illinois Circuit Court · Dec 6, 1877

Hills v. Chicago, 60 Ill. 86 ; Edwards v. City of Springfield, 10 Chicago Leg. … Such is Murphy v. The People, 2 Cow. 815 ; People v. Goodwin, 5 Wend. 251 ; Duffey v. The People, 6 Hill, 75 ; Plato v. People, 3 Parker Cr. 586 ; McGear v. Woodruff, 4 Vroom. (N.

Stephens v. Board of Education

6 Thomp. & Cook 148 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1875

Gill, being a member of the board of education of the city of Brooklyn, and while acting as its agent, received and embezzled certain of its moneys. … The case of Causidiere v. Beers sustains this principle.

Brown v. United States & Brazil Mail Steamship Co.

8 Misc. 562 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1894

. *563 Brown Brothers & Co. were creditors of the steamship company for the amount of certain drafts, accepted and paid hy them, drawn on letters of credit issued. … “John Crosby Brown and Others v.