Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

0.66s

  • Cashman v. State Board of Control

    3 Ct. Cl. 259 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Apr 19, 1946

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fitzpatrick v. Board of Education

    67 Misc. 564 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1910

    Brooklyn Teachers’ Assn. v. Board of Education, 85 App. Div. 47 . Compare, also, Bogert v. Board of Education, 44 Misc. Rep. 10 ; affd., 106 App. Div. 56 ; Shaul v. Board of Education, 108 id. 19. … Callahan v. Board of Education, 174 N. Y. 169 . Compare People ex rel. Kinsley v. White, 64 App. Div. 390 , and People ex rel. Fitzgerald v. Board of Education, 86 id. 537 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Molloy v. Board of Health

    18 N.Y.S. 942 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1891

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Harvey

    39 How. Pr. 191 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1870

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. McCullough

    39 How. Pr. 37 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1869

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Freeoff

    17 How. Pr. 442 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1858

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown & Fay, Inc. v. Anderson Hills Shopping Center, Inc.

    29 Ohio Law Rep. 28 · Hamilton County Court · Nov 25, 1964

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. State of Illinois, Department of Public Aid

    30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 354 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Mar 3, 1975

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Codex Corp. v. Board of Regents

    16 Ct. Cl. 83 · West Virginia Court of Claims · May 23, 1986

    Codex Corporation, a Massachusetts based manufacturer of technical equipment, supplied the West Virginia Network for Educational Telecomputing (hereinafter referred to as WVNET), a State agency under the auspices of the Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Josten's, Inc. v. Board of Regents

    15 Ct. Cl. 301 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jun 28, 1985

    The Lawhead Press, Inc. v. Board of Regents, CC-84-16 (1985). The respondent accepted and used the handbooks, and for it now to escape paying for them would be unjust enrichment.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Korbanic v. Board of Probation & Parole

    15 Ct. Cl. 184 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Oct 23, 1984

    The claim is based upon the claimant’s theory that a person placed upon parole by the respondent, the West Virginia Board of Probation and Parole, is a ward of the State and that the State is liable for the results of such

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Scopelliti v. Board of Zoning Appeals

    125 Misc. 2d 586 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1984

    Accordingly, Town of Hempstead v Romano (supra) cannot be *590 construed as addressing the issue before this court. … Delany, 62 AD2d 990 ; Matter of Forest Hills Tenants Assn. v Joy, 91 AD2d 912 ), this court concludes that the challenged determination or respondent Board of Zoning Appeals must be sustained.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bush v. Board of Supervisors

    13 Misc. 707 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1895

    Brown, J. … Perkins v. Milford, 59 Maine, 315 ; Moulton v. Raymond, 60 id. 121; Freeland v. Hastings, 92 Mass. (10 Allen) 570 ; Mead v. Acton, 139 Mass. 341 ; Kelly v. Marshall, 69 Penn. St. 319; Ferguson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hurchick v. Falls Township Board of Supervisors

    32 Pa. D. & C.2d 729 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County · Apr 5, 1963

    McGinley, 342 Pa. 12 (1941); Thompson v. Fox, 326 Pa. 209 (1937); Wyatt v. Russell, 308 Pa. 366 (1932); Wallace v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 222 Pa. 556 (1909). And see Rigney v. Snellenberg & Co., supra. … Alexander v. Knight, 197 Pa.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Slack v. Public Employees Insurance Board

    11 Ct. Cl. 272 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jun 29, 1977

    Slack, formerly the executive secretary of the Public Employees Insurance Board. Mr. Slack resigned his position on February 14, 1977, and at that time had accrued 2214 days of annual leave.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Robison v. State Board of Control

    3 Ct. Cl. 66 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Feb 2, 1945

    Robison, a former city mail carrier at New Mar-tinsville, seeks in this case an award of $26,988.35, and bases his claim on alleged negligence of the state board of control and the state road commission, their officers and … In the opinion in the case of Claim No. 228, Johnson v. State Road Commission, 2 Ct. Claims (W.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reynolds v. State Board of Control

    3 Ct. Cl. 185 · West Virginia Court of Claims · May 8, 1946

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Roberts v. State Board of Control

    3 Ct. Cl. 235 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1946

    The claimant had no formal contract in writing with the board of control, but it clearly appears that the work was authorized by at least one member of the board and by the president of the college. … The work was irregularly done insofar as a contract was concerned, but it was well done and entirely satisfactory to the president of the college and to the board of control.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Spa Baths Co. v. Board of Commissioners

    98 Misc. 399 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1917

    That is the rule of construction. 35 Cyc. 1119; Burks v. Bosso, 180 N. Y. 344 ; State Board of Pharmacy v. Gasau, 195 id. 202. Powers were given, but there was no reference to liabilities. … Y. 308, 311 ; Sanders v. Saxton, 182 id. 477; Saranac Land & Timber Co. v. Roberts, 195 id. 320.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Strum v. Board of Education

    191 Misc. 205 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1947

    In Hammond v. Hopkins ( 143 U. … Corp. v. Madame X Co., Inc. ( 130 Misc. 836 ) a declaration was refused, where there was a delay of two years before the declaration was sought. In Hencken v. City of Morgan Hill ( 21 Cal.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.