Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

2.64s

  • Thompson v. State Board of Control

    3 Ct. Cl. 111 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Aug 29, 1945

    It was because of the misuse of the stationary fire escape by students that the board of control caused it to be changed to a cantilever or weight lift fire escape. … The contract for this work was awarded by the board of control in February or March 1943 to James J. Weiler & Sons, structural steel contractors of Huntington.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Grogan v. State Board of Control

    3 Ct. Cl. 169 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Apr 29, 1946

    It sufficiently appears from the majoriiy opinion that relations between the executive secretary to the board of examiners for registered nurses and the claimant, a former stenographer for the board, were anything but cordial … It thus appears that within the contemplation of the Legislature additional duties and greater labors were to be performed by the board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Richards v. State Board of Education

    3 Ct. Cl. 251 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Nov 8, 1946

    See - dissenting opinion in re Richards v. Board of Education, 1 Ct. Claims (W. Va.) 142. at page 151. … See Dillon v. Board of Education, 1 Ct. claims (W. Va.) 366. The foregoing decision also reversed the holding or finding in Johnson v. Board of Education, 1 Ct. claims (W. Va.) 158.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cashman v. State Board of Control

    3 Ct. Cl. 259 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Apr 19, 1946

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Harvey

    39 How. Pr. 191 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1870

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. McCullough

    39 How. Pr. 37 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1869

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dellwood Foods, Inc. v. Board of Education

    97 Misc. 2d 751 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1978

    Corp. v Rubin, 30 Misc 2d 185 , mod on other grounds 15 AD2d 561 , affd 10 NY2d 538 ; Matter of Meyer v Board of Educ., 31 Misc 2d 407 ). … Corp. v Rubin, supra; Matter of Haskell-Gilroy v Young, supra).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Freeoff

    17 How. Pr. 442 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1858

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Arvidson v. Board of County Commissioners

    27 Ohio Misc. 93 · Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas · May 3, 1971

    Co. v. … In Fidelity National Bank & Trust Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wood v. Board of Barbers & Cosmetologists

    20 Ct. Cl. 83 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 21, 1994

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Lindsay

    2024 NY Slip Op 34249(U) · New York Supreme Court, Kings County · Nov 26, 2024

    Brown v Lindsay 2024 NY Slip Op 34249(U) November 26, 2024 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 534320/2023 Judge: Wavny Toussaint Cases … -----------------------------------X DWAIN BROWN and SANDY BIEN-AIME Index No. 534320/2023 BROWN, Plaintiffs, DECISION

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Burk v. Loudoun County School Board

    31 Va. Cir. 426 · Loudoun County Circuit Court · Sep 7, 1993

    Dunbar v. Gym of America, 493 P.2d 660 , 50 A.L.R. 3d 992 (1972). … Nor is the holding in the case of Tazewell County School Board v. Gillenwater, 241 Va. 166 (1991), applicable in this case.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Boettler v. Board of Township Trustees

    83 Ohio Law. Abs. 184 · Summit County Court of Common Pleas · Mar 11, 1960

    In Ohio, under the so-called urban rule, within a municipality, under 95 Oh Ap 383 (1953), Lunsford v. Stewart, and 102 Oh Ap 324 (1956), Keiser v. … See Butler v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mastroianni v. Board of Liquor Control

    69 Ohio Law. Abs. 431 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Apr 13, 1954

    Sobiech v. Fleckner, No. 31903, in which the Supreme Court overruled a demurrer to the petition in mandamus. One of the authorities cited in behalf of the demurrer was 1939 O. A. G. Opn. … The Court finds that the order of the Board of Liquor Control is supported by reliable, probative and substantial evidence and that the order of the Board is in accordance with law. The order of the Board is affirmed.

    Reversed on other grounds by Mastroianni v. Board of Liquor Control, 98 Ohio App. 500 (1954)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. State Board of Control

    2 Ct. Cl. 203 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Oct 19, 1943

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fletcher v. State Board of Control

    2 Ct. Cl. 280 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Feb 16, 1944

    Lambert v. … Board of Control, case no. 139, we held in refusing an award, that the authorities in charge of the industrial school must be guilty of such negligence or breach of duty as would contribute directly to an escape of one of

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    18 Ct. Cl. 172 · West Virginia Court of Claims · May 28, 1991

    Claimant seeks $877.57 for travel expenses as he is a member of the respondent’s Appeal Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carmichael v. Board of Probation & Parole

    18 Ct. Cl. 78 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Aug 10, 1990

    Claimant was appointed to the West Virginia Board of Probation and Parole as of January 11, 1989. … Claimant seeks $1,699.99 for accumulated annual leave from the Board of Probation and Parole based upon the allegation that the annual leave transferred with claimant.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Perry v. Retirement Board

    63 Pa. D. & C.2d 529 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Dec 20, 1973

    Once a laborer, at a per diem wage, elects to join the *531 Fund and is accepted by the Board, he cannot withdraw as a member at a later date.” … The definition was stated with a refreshing succinctness in Pennsylvania and Delaware Railroad Co. v. Leuffer, 84 Pa. 168 (1877): “We thereby intend those who are engaged, not in head, but in hand work.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Bullard v. Contracting Board

    33 Barb. 510 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1861

    And such was manifestly the action of the contracting board in this case. … It is alleged on the one side and denied on the other, that the board" has accepted such bids before.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.