Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

2.55s

  • First American Title Insurance v. Brown

    7 Va. Cir. 549 · Alexandria County Circuit Court · Dec 4, 1979

    McKay v. Citizens Rapid Transit Company, 190 Va. 851 , 59 S.E.2d 121 , 20 A.L.R.2d 918 (1950). … The Court is persuaded that under the principles set forth in Coy v. Raabe, 418 P.2d 728 (1966), and Chicago Title Insurance Company v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Herald Co. v. Board of Parole

    131 Misc. 2d 36 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 12, 1985

    Thus, respondents miss the mark when they assert that "the agreement between the parolee and the Board of Parole to abide by the conditions of parole represents a private matter between the Board of Parole and the parolee … (Pell v Procunier, 417 US 817, 834 ; Saxbe v Washington Post Co., 417 US 843, 850 .)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Friends of Pine Bush v. Planning Board

    96 Misc. 2d 320 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1978

    Although the need in zoning cases for a broader rule of standing and the actual broadening of said rule has been recognized (Matter of Douglaston Civic Assn. v Galvin, 36 NY2d 1 ), the court must still be satisfied that the … (Matter of Douglaston Civic Assn. v Galvin, 43 AD2d 739, 740 .) That interest need not be solely economic, but it may represent aesthetic and environmental values as well.

    Modified by Friends of Pine Bush v. Planning Board, 71 A.D.2d 780 (1979)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Saczawa

    2025 NY Slip Op 50159(U) · New York Supreme Court, Kings County · Feb 14, 2025

    Brown v Saczawa ( 2025 NY Slip Op 50159(U) ) [*1] Brown v Saczawa 2025 NY Slip Op 50159(U) Decided on February 14, 2025 Supreme Court, Kings County Maslow, J. … Xethalis, a board certified orthopedic surgeon, examined plaintiff Brown on March 19, 2024. Notably, while certain body parts examined were found to have no limitations, Dr.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Hines v. State Board of Parole

    181 Misc. 280 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1943

    Y. 888 ; Matter of Ditchik v. State Board of Parole, 181 Misc. 346 ; People ex rel. Kohlepp v. McGee, 256 App. Div. 792 , appeal dismissed 282 N. Y. 677 ; People ex rel. Kleinger v. Wilson, 254 App. … Div. 406 ; People ex rel. von Moser v. State Parole Board, 179 Misc. 397 , affd. 266 App. Div. 896 ; Matter of Bitz v. Canavan, 257 App. Div. 247 , affd. 281 N. Y. 699 .)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Alberene Stone Co. v. Board of Education

    153 Misc. 812 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1934

    On June 12, 1931, the defendant Edward V. McGovern Corporation made a contract with the defendant board of education of the city of New York for certain plumbing work at Brooklyn Technical High School. … Mason v. McClave ( 99 N.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Arrick v. State Board of Control

    3 Ct. Cl. 141 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Dec 18, 1945

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Norfolk City School Board

    46 Va. Cir. 238 · Norfolk County Circuit Court · Jul 29, 1998

    Brown v. Commonwealth, 15 Va. App. 1 , 421 S.E.2d 877 (1992). … See, e.g., Brown v. Commonwealth, 15 Va. App. 1, 6-7 , 421 S.E.2d 877, 882 (1992).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Pierson v. Board of Sup'rs

    34 N.Y.S. 568 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1895

    Strough v. Board of Sup’rs, 119 N. Y. 212 , 23 N. E. 552 . The case of Spaulding v. Arnold (Sup.) 6 N. Y. Supp. 336 , and 125 N. Y. 194 , 26 N. … The case of Kilbourne v. Board of Sup’rs (Sup. and App.) 16 N. Y. Supp. 507 , 33 N. E. 159 , was an action like this. It was held that the six-years statute of limitations applies.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ryan v. Board of Audit

    27 N.Y.S. 169 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1893

    People v. Board of Sup’rs of Otsego Co., 51 N. Y. 401, 407, 408 ; People v. Board of Sup’rs of New York, 32 N. Y. 473 ; Hull v. Supervisors, 19 Johns. 259 ; People v. Board of Sup’rs of Westchester Co., 73 N. … Y. 173 ; People v. Board of Sup’rs of Delaware Co., 45 N. Y. 196 ; People v. Board of Town Auditors of Elmira, 82 N. Y. 80 ; People v. Schuyler, 79. N. Y. 189; Fiero, Spec. Proc. pp. 48, 52; People v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Barnum v. Board of Supervisors

    16 N.Y.S. 513 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1891

    This case is similar to that of Kilbourne v. Board, 16 N. Y. Supp. 507 , (decided at this term.) It will not be necessary to consider any of the questions decided in that case. … The bonds which were considered in Strough v. Board, 119 N. Y. 212 , 23 N. E. Rep. 552, had a history somewhat similar. In People v. Sawyer, 52 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bergen County Welfare Board v. Naacke

    77 N.J. Super. 37 · Bergen County Superior Court · Oct 26, 1962

    A. 44:7-14 was before the court in Camden County Welfare Bd. v. Federal Dep. Ins. Co., 1 N. J. Super. 533 (Ch. Div. 1948). … In Carlo v. Okonite-Callender Cable Co., 3 N.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Landmark Colony v. Board of Supervisors

    121 Misc. 2d 23 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1983

    Corp. v Board of Educ., 7 NY2d 381 ; Fallica v Town of Brookhaven, 69 AD2d 579 ; 1555 Boston Rd. Corp. v Finance Administrator, 61 AD2d 187 ; Eden v Board of Trustees, 49 AD2d 277, 284 ). … Matter of Pokoik v Silsdorf, 40 NY2d 769 ; Matter of Our Lady of Good Counsel v Ball, 38 NY2d 780 , affg 45 AD2d 66 ; Matter of Faymor Dev. Co. v Board of Stds. & Appeals, 45 NY2d 560 ).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners of Excise v. Backus

    29 How. Pr. 33 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1864

    the statute, this act, uncondemned by the unwritten law, whatever might be the sentence pronounced “ in foro consciente,’ was prohibited under a penalty. “ The statute,” as was said by Lord Mansfield in an analogous case (Browning

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Community Board No. 6 v. Scribner

    78 Misc. 2d 195 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1974

    S. 2d 175; Cassel v. Board of Educ., Common School Dist., 220 N. Y. S. 2d 262; Kovarsky v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 279 N. Y. 304 .) … Verbanic v. Nyquist, 41 A D 2d 466.) .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Supervisors v. Sherlo Realty, Inc.

    32 Misc. 2d 579 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1961

    Y. 483, 489 ; Brooks-Scanlon Corp. v. United States, 265 U. S. 106, 123 ; Matter of Board of Water Supply of City of N. Y., 277 N. Y. 452, 456 ). … (United States v. Miller, 317 U. S. 369 ; see, also, United States ex rel. Tenn. Val. Auth. v. Powelson, 319 U. S. 266 ; Olson v. United States, 292 U. S. 246 ; Matter of Board of Water Supply of City of N. Y., 277 N.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Smith v. State Board of Education

    8 Ct. Cl. 31 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jul 21, 1969

    On June 17, 1969, the Supreme Court of Appeals ordered this court to take jurisdiction of a claim against the Board of Governors of West Virginia University, and the Court’s opinion makes it clear that the Court of Claims … has jurisdiction to hear a claim against the State Board of Education, a corporate agency of the State of West Virginia.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lynch v. State Board of Control

    2 Ct. Cl. 1 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1942

    The state board of control, the state agency involved in this case, after due investigation of the claim in question and conference with the attorney general’s office, admits that the claim in the amount of $60.17 should … Liability on the part of the state to pay the claim in question is admitted by the board of control.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Frazier v. State Board of Control

    2 Ct. Cl. 130 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jul 22, 1943

    Frazier, while employed by the board of control at Weston state hospital, Weston, West Virginia, died on the twenty-sixth day of February 1935. … No report of any accident was ever made to the hospital staff or to the board of control, and no claim was made for any neglject or default of the board of control or of its officers and employees as to the cause of the decedent

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Arbogast v. State Board of Control

    2 Ct. Cl. 170 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jul 29, 1943

    Lynch v. State Board of Control, case no. 191. Therefore, an award of sixty-two dollars and fifty cents ($62.50) is made to claimant.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.