Case law

Board of Commissioners of Fulton Co. v. Board of Commissioners of Lucas Co.

5 Ohio Cir. Dec. 500 · Lucas Circuit Court · Oct 3, 1896

The statute provides — section 8 — “if said board of four freeholders shall not be able to agree upon the amount to be paid by said upper county to said lower county, then they shall call to their assistance one other freeholder

Johnson v. State Medical Board

147 Ohio Misc. 2d 121 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Jun 13, 2008

Our Place, Inc. v. … Bergin v. McCall (D.Or.2007), case No. 06-6311-HO, 2007 WL 2344924 , was a civil rights challenge to Oregon Medical Board proceeding. Perez-Rocha v.

Frigidaire Division v. Board of Review

59 Ohio Law. Abs. 302 · Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas · Feb 16, 1950

Collopy, Administrator of the Bureau of Unemployment Compensation, appellant v. Board of Review, et al, Common Pleas Court, Warren County, and Brown-Brockmeyer Co., employer-appellee v. … Wiper Member, Board of Review” Date of Mailing: June 14, 1949 Since the instant case was heard before the Board of Review, the Supreme Court, in the case of Brown-Brockmeyer Company v.

Tuxedo Conservation & Taxpayers Ass'n v. Town Board

96 Misc. 2d 1 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1978

We are not presented here with a situation where credibility of witnesses before the planning board is a substantial issue (cf. Smith v State of New York, 214 NY 140 ). … (Chrobuck v Snohomish County, 78 Wn 2d 858, 869.)

Cannon v. Board of Liquor Control

67 Ohio Law. Abs. 350 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Apr 7, 1953

BOARD OF LIQUOR CONTROL ORDER (REJECTING APPLICATION FOR D-5 PERMIT), — REVERSED. … In the case of Clouston, etc., et al. v Board of Liquor Control, et al, No. 181,856, this court, through Reynolds, J., ruled Section 3 of Regulation 12 of said Board of Liquor Control was invalid.

Board of Commissioners v. McCauley

2 Pa. D. & C.5th 160 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Jan 9, 2008

Murphy v. Board of Commissioners of Lower Merion Twp., 40 D.&C.3d 577, 580 (Montg. Cty. 1985). … This is supported by Soergel v. Board of Supervisors of Middlesex Township, 12 Pa. Commw. 311 , 316 A.2d 89 (1974). In that case, a township board reduced the defendant in rank from chief to patrolman.

Williams v. Virginia Manufactured Housing Board

47 Va. Cir. 426 · Rockingham County Circuit Court · Dec 2, 1998

Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Comm’n v. York Street Inn, Inc., 220 Va. 310, 315 , 257 S.E.2d 851 (1979) (quoting Schmidt v. Board of Adjustment of Newark, 9 N.J. 405, 423, 88 A.2d 607, 615-16 (1952)). … See, e.g., Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Virginia State Water Control Bd., 15 Va. App. 271 (1992); Johnston-Willis, Ltd. v. Kenley, 6 Va. App. 231 (1988).

Balaklaw v. American Board of Anesthesiology, Inc.

149 Misc. 2d 11 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1990

In this matter, it would be inappropriate for the court to substitute its judgment for that of the Board by compelling disclosure of the testing material. (Gertler v Goodgold, supra.) … (See, Matter of Salter v New York State Psychological Assn., 14 NY2d 100 [1964]; Goodman v Regan, 151 AD2d 958 [3d Dept 1989].)

Register v. Board of Pilot Commissioners

25 Fla. Supp. 75 · Circuit Court of the 4th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Duval County · May 31, 1965

Kotch v. Board of River Port Pilot Commissioners for the Port of New Orleans, 330 U.S. 552 (1946). … Attorney General v. Jones, 16 Fla. 306, 309-311 (S.C. Fla., 1878).

Weible v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

25 Pa. D. & C.2d 74 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County · Apr 17, 1961

These factors are: (1) Unnecessary hardship (more properly called “legal hardship”), and (2) that the proposed use will not be contrary to the public interest: Sylvester v. … Since the record fails to disclose that the decision of the zoning board of adjustment was arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable or a clear violation of positive law we are without power to interfere: Ruch v.

Fleishon v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

6 Pa. D. & C.2d 337 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 20, 1955

Kanefsky v. Dratch Construction Co., 376 Pa. 188, p. 195 (1954). … It may not be used by him for the benefit of other lots, etc., owned by him.’ ” Walker v. Walker, 153 Pa. Superior Ct. 20, p. 27 (1943).

Builders Supply Co. of Hopewell, Inc. v. Brown

24 Va. Cir. 369 · Richmond County Circuit Court · Aug 7, 1991

Toner & Son v. Staunton Production Credit Ass’n, 237 Va. 155 (1989); Brown v. American Broadcasting Co., Inc., 704 F.2d 1296 (4th Cir. 1983). … While plaintiff’s action here is not one sounding in fraud, a personal action, as was found in Toner and in Piggott v.

Halfmoon Bridge Co. v. Canal Board

91 Misc. 600 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1915

The canal board has attempted to appropriate a part of plaintiff’s lands at each end of the bridge, and this, with its constructions in the river, involves the destruction of the bridge. … Halfmoon Bridge Co. v. Acme Construction Co., 157 App. Div. 183 ; Halfmoon Bridge Co. v. Acme Construction Co., 163 id. 76; reversed on other grounds, 213 N. Y. 160 .

W. E. Brown, Inc. v. Stone

28 Va. Cir. 325 · Charlottesville County Circuit Court · Jul 9, 1992

All parties agree that Brown knew about the basis of his claim prior to the order of substitution in February, 1989. In MacLellan v. … In Oleyar v.

Goldstein v. Board of Zoning Appeals

113 Misc. 2d 756 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1982

The discretion of a board of zoning appeals in determining whether a special exception shall be granted is confined to the standards enacted to guide and limit the board’s power (Matter of Hartnett v Segur, 21 AD2d 132 ). … When the standards have been met the board is without authority to deny the exception (Matter of Holmes & Murphy v Bush, 6 AD2d 200 ; Matter of Harrison-Warren Realty Co. v Spencer, 124 Misc 783 ; Larkfield Equities v Larkin

People v. Brown

2025 NY Slip Op 50381(U) · The Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York · Mar 26, 2025

People v Brown ( 2025 NY Slip Op 50381(U) ) [*1] People v Brown 2025 NY Slip Op 50381(U) Decided on March 26, 2025 Criminal Court Of The City Of New York, New York County Coleman, J. … Brown moves to suppress a noticed statement as involuntary and as the fruit of an unlawful arrest ( People v Huntley , 15 NY2d 72 [1965]; Dunaway v New York , 442 US 200 [1979]); for a voluntariness hearing regarding any

Van Nostrand v. Board of Supervisors

67 Misc. 2d 1096 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1971

(Iannucci v. Board of Supervisors of County of Washington, 20 N Y 2d 244, 253.) … (Iannucci v. Board of Supervisors of County of Washington, 20 N Y 2d 244, 252, supra).

Civera v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

9 Pa. D. & C.3d 39 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 22, 1977

Zoning Board of Adjustment, 404 Pa. 198, 200-1 , 170 A. 2d 553 (1961); Richman v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 391 Pa. 254, 259-60 , 137 A. 2d 280 (1958). … Magrann v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, supra, at 200-1; Ventresca v. Exley, 358 Pa. 98, 100 , 56 A. 2d 210 (1948). Woodmere has demonstrated that its property meets these tests.

Roach v. Roach

67 Ohio Law. Abs. 162 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · Dec 1, 1953

In Bush v. … Armstrong v. Armstrong, 117 Oh St 558, McPherson v. McPherson, supra, 157 A. L. R., 175, Sistare v. Sistare, 218 U. S., 1 .

Gander v. Board of Fire Commissioners

117 Misc. 2d 830 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1983

Proof was submitted from the Board of Elections of Nassau County indicating that the records of that board confirm the position of the petitioner that 92 voters were not registered. … (Filiberto v Roosevelt Fire Dist., 75 AD2d 572 ; Leggio v Brentwood Fire Dist., Supreme Ct, Suffolk County, Stark, J.; DiNicola v West Islip Fire Dist., Supreme Ct, Suffolk County, Stark, J.)