Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.88s
St. John v. Board of Elections
145 Misc. 2d 324 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 19, 1989
Now specific challenges have taken place at the opening of the ballots and the controversy is ripe for review (see, Matter of O’Shaughnessy v Monroe County Bd. of Elections, 15 AD2d 183,188 ). … of Elections to properly scrutinize such voter’s initial application (see, Shells v Flynn, 252 App Div 238 , affg 164 Mise 302, affd 275 NY 446 ).
Cited 7 timesPublishedFishel v. Frederick County School Board
11 Va. Cir. 283 · Frederick County Circuit Court · May 17, 1988
School Board, 462 F.2d 1058, 1067 (4th Cir. 1972), aff’d 412 U.S. 92 (1973), citing School Board of Prince William County v. Griffin, 204 Va. 650 (1963). … Petitioners cite McEntire v. Brevard County School Board, 471 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. App. 5th Dist. 1985).
Cited 3 timesPublishedSmalls v. Board of Standards & Appeals
28 Misc. 2d 147 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1961
Matter of Arents v. … Alexion v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedPage v. Board of Liquor Control
69 Ohio Law. Abs. 545 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Mar 5, 1954
the Board. … The Board is directed to receive and process applications for new permits which are filed and pending with the Board, in accordance with law and in compliance with this decision.
Cited 2 timesPublishedState ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Board of Commissioners
14 Ohio C.C. 26 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Feb 15, 1897
Phillips v. Gaines; Gim v. W. S. Dist., 57 Pa. St., 433, 98 Am. D., 242 ; Bennet v. Kroth, 37 Kas., 235 , 1 Am. St., 248.) … (McDonald v. Page, Wright’s R., 121; Ela v. Knox, 46 N. H., 16, 88 Am. D., 179 ; Bennet v. Kroth, 37 Kas., 235 . 1 Am. St., 248.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Bessemer Irrigating Ditch Co.
1 Colo. N. P. 286 · Pueblo County District Court · Mar 17, 1902
In Van Schoick v. Canal Co., 20 N. J. … In the case of Davis v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBirkbeck v. Wadsworth Board of Education
17 Ohio Misc. 245 · Medina County Court of Common Pleas · Feb 26, 1969
As pointed out by the court in the case of Pittsburg Steel Co. v. … In the case of State v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedNassau Chapter v. Board of Education
63 Misc. 2d 49 · New York Supreme Court · May 8, 1970
It is not for the court to enlarge the contract by inserting provisions which the parties could have negotiated and agreed upon but did not (Janos v. Peck, 21 A D 2d 529, 533, affd. 15 N Y 2d 509; Frankel v. … Such act on behalf of plaintiff obviously would prove futile, for the school board has already made its unalterable position known and there is no indication of a willingness upon its part to submit this matter to any impartial
Cited 4 timesPublishedKokomo Straw-Board Co. v. Sachs
7 N.Y.S. 179 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1889
Cited 1 timesPublishedMeyer v. Board of Liquor Control
69 Ohio Law. Abs. 407 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Apr 20, 1954
A similar question, however, was presented in the case of Solvey v. Molony, 40 California Appeals 2nd, 381. … The order of the Board is affirmed.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBoard of Higher Education v. Marcus
63 Misc. 2d 268 · New York Supreme Court · May 28, 1970
The opposing affidavits do not show that the plaintiff will not be entitled to permanent relief (Board of Higher Educ. of City of N. Y. v. … Students for Democratic Soc., 60 Misc 2d 114 , supra; Board of Higher Educ. of City of N. Y. v. Rubain, 62 Misc 2d 978 ).
Cited 6 timesPublishedBrown v. University of Rochester Strong Memorial Hospital
77 Misc. 2d 221 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1974
Cited 4 timesPublishedRuane v. Virginia Real Estate Board
36 Va. Cir. 420 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Jun 6, 1995
In this area, of course, the Court must accord considerable deference to the Board’s resolution. Va. Code Ann. § 9-6.14:17 ; Brown-Forman Corp. v. Sims Wholesale Co., 20 Va. App. 423 , 457 S.E.2d 426 (1995). … Brown-Forman, supra; see Virginia Supermarkets v. George, 18 Va. App. 452, 453 (1994). A determination of whether or not to grant the waiver must address the application submitted by Ms.
Cited 1 timesPublishedJorling v. Freshwater Wetlands Appeals Board
147 Misc. 2d 880 · New York Supreme Court · May 31, 1990
The formal rules of procedure may be disregarded in administrative hearings (Matter of Simpson v Wolansky, 38 NY2d 391, 395 ; cf., Matter of Brown v Ristich, 36 NY2d 183 ). … See, Jorling v Freshwater Wetlands Appeals Bd., 147 Misc 2d 165,171 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedWright v. Town Board of Carlton
70 Misc. 2d 1 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1972
In Kramer v. Union School Dist. ( 395 U. … The finding by the Town Board that all lands in the town would be benefited by the improvements is generally held to be the product of the legislative power (Gaynor v. Marohn, 268 N. Y. 417 [1935]; Valley Farms Co. v.
Cited 6 timesPublished84 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 411 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1894
In Bullock v. The Mayor, etc. ( 99 N. … (Palmer v. Dearing, 93 N. Y. 10 .)
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrooks v. Board of Higher Education
113 Misc. 2d 494 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1982
(See Tillot v New York State Thruway Auth., 107 Misc 2d 229 .) … (See Horoch v State of New York, 286 App Div 303, 306 .)
Cited 5 timesPublishedBrewer v. Board of Liquor Control
66 Ohio Law. Abs. 191 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Apr 30, 1953
The school authorities were notified but did not appear for the hearing before the Board. Mr. N. J. … Entry accordingly with exceptions by counsel for the Board.
Cited 1 timesPublishedShapiro v. Jewish Board of Guardians
165 Misc. 581 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1937
(Corbett v. St. Vincent’s Industrial School, 177 N. Y. 16.) … (Herman v. Board of Education ( 234 N. Y. 196 . See, also, Sheehan v. North Country Community Hospital, 273 id. 163.) Motion denied..
Cited 3 timesPublishedCohn v. Freshwater Wetlands Appeals Board
150 Misc. 2d 807 · New York Supreme Court · May 1, 1991
This litigation, and prior proceedings before the Freshwater Wetlands Appeals Board (hereinafter FWAB) concern the designation of a certain parcel of property by the respondents Commissioner Jorling and the Department of … Germain v St. Germain, supra).
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna