Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.24s
Board of Education v. West Virginia Board of Education
17 Ct. Cl. 170 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Feb 3, 1989
It is the claimants' position that the McDowell County Board of Education was required to follow the advice of the West Virginia Board of Education. … The State Board in turn placed the same burden on the claimant, McDowell County Board of Education.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOtis v. Board of Higher Education
199 Misc. 157 · New York Supreme Court · May 8, 1950
A similar excuse was offered and rejected in Matter of De Wyrall v. McNamara ( 198 Misc. 325 ). … Y. 543, 549 ; Wildey v. McElligott, 167 Misc. 101, 107 ).
Cited 3 timesPublishedState ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Board of Commissioners
14 Ohio C.C. 26 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Feb 15, 1897
Phillips v. Gaines; Gim v. W. S. Dist., 57 Pa. St., 433, 98 Am. D., 242 ; Bennet v. Kroth, 37 Kas., 235 , 1 Am. St., 248.) … (McDonald v. Page, Wright’s R., 121; Ela v. Knox, 46 N. H., 16, 88 Am. D., 179 ; Bennet v. Kroth, 37 Kas., 235 . 1 Am. St., 248.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Mar 9, 2020
AP-19-57 JAMIE MAILLARD, Plain tiff-A ppe 11ee V. … The court has listened to the recording of the hearing held on November 25, 2019, which includes the testimony of Jamie Maillard, Gwyneth Elvin, Hillary Goodliff and Gail Brown.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedGoldway v. Board of Higher Education
178 Misc. 1023 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1942
The Board of Higher Education is a State instrumentality as is the Board of Transportation. Yet, in Ferdinand v. Moses ( 26 N. Y. Supp. 382 ; affd., 262 App. … (See also Matter of Schaefer v. Rathmann, 237 App. Div. 491 ; affd., 262 N. Y. 492 ; Matter of Dieter v. Ryan, 267 id. 594 .) Accordingly, the motion is denied.
Cited 5 timesPublishedSmith v. Community Board No. 14
128 Misc. 2d 944 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 8, 1985
(Walz v Tax Commn., 397 US 664, 668-669 ; see also, Zorach v Clauson, 343 US 306 ; Everson v Board of Educ., 330 US 1 .) … (Lynch v Donnelly, supra; Widmar v *948 Vincent, supra; McCreary v Stone, 739 F2d 716, affd sub nom. McCreary v Board of Trustees of Scarsdale, 471 US_,_S Ct_, 53 USLW 4431 .)
Cited 10 timesPublished29 Misc. 3d 706 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 3, 2010
Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. … Board of Educ., 29 AD3d 574 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 708 , 709 [2006]; 4 see generally Matter of Jones v Board of Educ. *710 of Watertown City School Dist., 30 AD3d 967 , 970 [2006] [“during this period” means only the period
Cited 0 timesPublishedMills Automatic Merchandising Co. v. Brown
47 Pa. D. & C. 169 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County · Apr 7, 1943
Brown: Aarons v. Public Service B. & L. Assn. et al., 318 Pa. 113 , 116. … .: ‘that the property in question is, by statute, exempt from attachment’ ”: Provident Trust Co. v. Rothman et al., supra. See also Integrity Trust Co. v. Taylor, 312 Pa. 3 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown-Ketcham Iron Works v. Hazen
4 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 582 · Hamilton Circuit Court · Jan 14, 1903
Counsel for Brown-Ketcham contend that it did. As to this rule, Chief-Justice Fuller said, in Chicago M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Clark, 178 U. … Ry. v. Clark, supra, that the law in Ohio is different, and adheres more strictly to the rule of Cumber v. Wane, and reliance is had upon Willis v. Bateman, 1 O. S. C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJorling v. Freshwater Wetlands Appeals Board
147 Misc. 2d 165 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1990
(Duplex Co. v Deering, 254 US 443, 475 .) … Therefore, even if the court would have reached a different conclusion, it may not substitute its decision for that of the board or agency. (Peconic Bay Broadcasting Corp. v Board of Appeals, 99 AD2d 773 .)
Cited 3 timesPublishedBrown v. Maryland Telephone & Telegraph Co.
2 Balt. C. Rep. 326 · Baltimore City Circuit Court · Dec 3, 1904
(Orally)— In the case of Alexander Brown vs. The Maryland Telephone, and Telegraph Company I think the demurrer must be sustained. … The purpose of that act was merely to permit the board of directors to appoint an executive committee, to give the company power to connect with other telephone companies.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Mercantile Trust & Deposit Co.
1 Balt. C. Rep. 714 · Baltimore City Circuit Court · Dec 23, 1897
Cited 0 timesPublished31 Fla. Supp. 197 · Circuit Court of the 20th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Collier County · Dec 9, 1968
The plaintiffs urged upon this court several constitutional grounds for reversal of the actions of the defendant canvassing board, as well as several statutory grounds. … Fair v. Adams, supra.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Union Free School District No. 8
88 Misc. 2d 755 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1976
First, Timothy Brown has an absolute constitutional right to a free public education (NY Const, art XI, § 1). That the child’s right to such an education is paramount (Matter of Jeter v Ellenville Cent. … In the case of Timothy Brown, that district is Amityville. In Matter of Jeter v Ellenville Cent.
Cited 3 timesPublishedStanford Associates v. Board of Assessors
67 Misc. 2d 477 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1971
and herein referred to as “ School District ”, seeks an order to intervene as a party in this action and to set aside a certain stipulation entered into by and between the petitioner, Stanford Associates, and respondent, Board … The School District’s grounds for intervention and setting aside the stipulation and the order entered thereon are based on a claim of a deprivation and prejudice of substantial rights of the Board of Education and the taxpayers
Cited 2 timesPublished44 Fla. Supp. 2d 105 · Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · Aug 14, 1990
The School Board seeks to have its legitimacy determined based on a recent Supreme Court ruling. In Kane v Robbins, 556 SO.2d 1381 (S. … A similar argument was made in Broward County v Plantation Imports, Inc., 410 So.2d 1145 . The issue dealt with the right of the county’s consumer protection board to impose civil penalties.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTranstechnology Corp. v. Board of Assessors
21 Misc. 3d 215 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 7, 2008
I v Board of Assessors (index Nos. 18523/86, 17-8708/89). … In Matter of Chasalow v Board of Assessors of County of Nassau ( 202 AD2d 499 [2d Dept 1994]), the Court reviewed a determination of the Honorable Leo F.
Cited 1 timesPublishedFishel v. Frederick County School Board
11 Va. Cir. 283 · Frederick County Circuit Court · May 17, 1988
School Board, 462 F.2d 1058, 1067 (4th Cir. 1972), aff’d 412 U.S. 92 (1973), citing School Board of Prince William County v. Griffin, 204 Va. 650 (1963). … Petitioners cite McEntire v. Brevard County School Board, 471 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. App. 5th Dist. 1985).
Cited 3 timesPublishedSmalls v. Board of Standards & Appeals
28 Misc. 2d 147 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1961
Matter of Arents v. … Alexion v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Auditor, County Board of Education
26 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 33 · Williams County Court of Common Pleas · Dec 31, 1925
State, ex rel., v. Gilbert, 56 O. S., 575; State, ex rel., v. Otter, 106 O. S., 415; Cottrell v. Com., 24 O. N. P. (N. S.), 281; Zanesville v. Telegraph Co., 64 O. S., 67; Schario v. State, 105 O. S., 535; Wagner v. … Board of Education, 99 O. S., 369; Board of Education v. State, and Board of Education v. Brucker, not reported, decided by the Court of Appeals of Gallia Co., Oct. 31, 1925; Blackford v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna