Case law

Brown v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

145 Misc. 642 · City of New York Municipal Court · Oct 18, 1932

(Smith v. Prudential Ins. Co., 147 App. … (Ruoff v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co., 86 App. Div. 447 ; Cohen v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co., 135 id. 776, at p. 778; Golden v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 35 id. 569; McNamara v.

Pully v. Zoning Appeals Board

29 Va. Cir. 467 · Virginia Beach County Circuit Court · May 3, 1972

This application was then referred to the Board of Zoning Appeals, and said Board refused to hear the matter because it took the position that it lacked jurisdiction. … This is a request for a variance, and the Board of Zoning Appeals would have jurisdiction.

Junar Construction Co. v. Town Board

57 Misc. 2d 727 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 27, 1968

Thus, the presumption that the zoning ordinance is ‘ ‘ supported by facts known to the [legislative body] ” (Wiggins v. … In 1957 the exception was re-enacted (see Matter of Cabral v.

Sellman v. Florance Gordon Brown, P.C.

82 Va. Cir. 59 · Richmond County Circuit Court · Nov 18, 2010

For the purposes of these motions only, and by agreement of counsel, the Court has consolidated this case with the following cases currently pending: Barbara Sellman v. Florance Gordon Brown, P.C., et al., Case No. … CL09-4196; Marjorie Bruce v. Florance Gordon Brown, P.C., et al., Case No. CL09-4198; and Michael B. Sellman v. Florance Gordon Brown, P.C., et al., Case No. CL09-4199.

Grotke v. Board of Supervisors

62 Misc. 2d 953 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1970

Board of Supervisors (27 A D 2d 346, 348 [3d Dept., 1967]) was modified by the Court of Appeals and 60 days were given the defendant board (Iannucci v. … It is useful “ solely as a temporary expedient ’ ’ (Matter of Graham v. Board of Supervisors of Erie County, 18 N Y 2d 672, 674; Franklin v. Mandeville, 26 N Y 2d 65).

Button v. Mitchell

1 Mich. N.P. 295 · Michigan Circuit Court · Jul 1, 1870

Brown. *297 So far as the bill shows, the supposed cloud is a mere naked assertion of claim, without any' foundation whatever. … Brown are said to be children of Joseph Mitchell. If born before the will was made, they' would have no rights to the land unless provided, for in the will.

Cox v. Board of Estimate & Apportionment

140 Misc. 313 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1931

In Reis v. City of New York ( 113 App. Div. 464 ; affd., 188 N. … In Reis v. City of New York ( 113 App.

Fairfax County Board of Supervisors v. Zoning Appeals Board

46 Va. Cir. 20 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Apr 29, 1998

The reliance upon Vulcan Materials v. Board of Supervisors, 248 Va. 18 (1994), by Premier Car Rental, Inc. let al.) is misplaced. … Guinn v. Alward, 235 Va. 616, 621 (1988); Dick Kelly Enterprises v. City of Norfolk, 243 Va. 373, 378 (1992); Guinn v. Collier, 247 Va. 479, 484 (1994).

Le Tarte v. Board of Education

65 Misc. 2d 147 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1970

(Eastman Kodak Co. v. Richards, 123 Misc. 83, 86 ). … evidence to support the board’s findings.

Board of Education v. Allen

64 Misc. 2d 379 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1970

To hold otherwise would result in a delegation by the courts to every local school board the responsibility and authority vested by statute in the Board of Regents and the Commissioner of Education. … (Matter of Vetere v. Allen, 15 N Y 2d 259, 267, supra.)

Rosen v. Public Employment Relations Board

128 Misc. 2d 628 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1985

of Fisher [Levine], 36 NY2d 146, 149-150 ; Matter of West Irondequoit Teachers Assn. v Helsby, supra, pp 50-51; Matter of Howard v Wyman, 28 NY2d 434, 437-438 ; Civil Service Law, §§ 200, 205).” … (Labor Bd. v Babcock & Wilcox Co., 351 US 105, 113 .)

City of Lancaster v. Brown

11 Pa. D. & C. 633 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County · Jul 7, 1928

Co. v. Harrisburg, 271 Pa. 340 . … In Coxe v.

Taber v. Board of Supervisors

14 N.Y.S. 211 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1891

Mann v. Board of Education

53 How. Pr. 289 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1877

for a school-house, and the proceedings upon appeal from said board to the superintendent of public instruction, this decision, upon the appeal and upon the letter of T. … That such proceedings were regularly taken, and the board of education had issued.a warrant for the collection of a tax of $2,800, $2,000 of which was assessed on tax-payers of Danforth.

Davis v. Board of Elections

14 Misc. 2d 494 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1958

The fourth member of the board is deceased. His successor was not in being. The action of the board was unanimous. … Nothing in the cases cited (Matter of Burke v. Terry, 203 N. Y. 293 ; Matter of Hopper v. Britt, 204 N. Y. 524 ; Matter of Moore v. Walsh, 286 N. Y. 552 ) supports the position of petitioner.

Khoury v. Board of Liquor Control

74 Ohio Law. Abs. 492 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Jan 8, 1957

Farrand v. State Medical Board, etc., 151 Oh St 222. See also Wallace v. Board of Liquor Control, 64 Abs 477 . … Scaravilli v. Board of Liquor Control, supra.

Crowninshield v. Board of Supervisors

8 N.Y.S. 945 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1889

Judgment ordered on the submission in favor of the plaintiff, in accordance with the decision of this court in the case of Wood v. Supervisors, 2 N. Y. … Supp. 369, with costs against the board of supervisors; judgment to be settled by Dwight, J.

Casino Free Tyre v. Town Board

51 Misc. 3d 665 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 29, 2016

(Webster Assoc. v Town of Webster, 59 NY2d 220, 227 [1983]; Matter of Laird v Town of Montezuma, 191 AD2d 986 [4th Dept 1993].) … (Matter of Jackson v New York State Urban Dev.

Board of Supervisors v. Martin

23 Va. Cir. 37 · Virginia Circuit Court · Dec 4, 1990

However, the Court in Knowlton v. Browning-Ferris, did not address the issue of exhaustion of administrative remedies. … See, Board of Supervisors of Henrico County, et al. v. Market Inns, Inc., 228 Va. 82 , 319 S.E.2d 737 (1984).

McArdle v. Board of Estimate

74 Misc. 2d 1014 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1973

, it has been held that while an unsuccessful low bidder may maintain an article 78 proceeding to review the legality of the bidding process, this right is not granted one who did not bid (see Matter of Dictaphone Corp. v. … Corp. v. Cronin, 34 A D 2d 692; Matter of Barile v. City Comptroller of City of Utica, 56 Misc 2d 190 ).