Case law

Brown v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.

10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 278 · Lucas Circuit Court · Oct 6, 1899

This suit was brought by David Brown against the Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Company, upon two causes of action, for injuries sustained by the plaintiff on account of alleged negligence of the defendant.

State ex rel. Perry County v. Brown

20 Ohio C.C. 57 · Perry Circuit Court · May 15, 1899

Brown, as infirmary director aforesaid, out of the county funds in the treasury of said Perry county, Ohio.” … By authority of the case of Jones v.

Lee v. Board of Education

120 Misc. 2d 809 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 1, 1983

(See Matter of Mitthauer v Patterson, 8 NY2d 37 ; Matter of Boddie v County of Westchester, 41 AD2d 546 , affd 33 NY2d 835 ; Matter of Lo Bello v McLaughlin, 39 AD2d 404 .) … Respondents contend that the penalty imposed by the board in the instant matter is precisely that imposed by the *811 Appellate Division, First Department, in Matter of Pauling v Smith ( 46 AD2d 759 ).

Board of Education v. Wilson

199 Misc. 631 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1951

(Matter of *633 Camfield v. Mealy, 288 N. Y. 149 ; Matter of Fabricius v. Graves, 254 App. Div. 19 ; Matter of Craig v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 173 Misc. 969 , affd. 262 App. Div. 706 ; People ex rel. … The constitutional limitation which formed the basis of the decision in Judd v. Board of Educ. ( 278 N. Y. 200 ) was removed by the adoption of the constitutional amendment (N. Y. State Const., art.

Board of Education v. Regan

107 Misc. 2d 37 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1980

(Johanns v Ficke, 224 NY 513 ; Matter of Meyer, 209 NY 386 .) … (Abate v Mundt, 25 NY2d 309, 318 .)

Lugo v. Board of Elections

123 Misc. 2d 764 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1984

(See Matter of Alamo v Black, 51 NY2d 716 ; Matter of Hutson v Bass, 54 NY2d 772 .) … (Cordero v Maldonado, 89 AD2d 975 .) Here, the referee found a “likelihood” that petitioner had notice even earlier, at least by the prior Wednesday.

Hines v. Board of Education

170 Misc. 745 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1939

(Citing Lessin v. Board of Education, 247 N. Y. 503 .) Section 578 is a part of article 20-B of the Education Law and has to do with children of retarded mental development. … (Johnson v. Board of Education, 210 App. Div. 723, 727 ; Katterschinsky v. Board of Education, 215 id. 695; Garber v. Central School District No. 1 , 251 id. 214 .)

Dynamo v. Brown Auto Hospital, Inc.

139 Misc. 867 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1931

(Innis, Pearce & Co. v. Poppenberg, Inc., 213 App. Div. 789, 790 .) The section was not intended to be used to foreclose a proper defense. … (Innis, Pearce & Co. v. Poppenberg, Inc., supra; International Milk Co., Inc., v. Cohen, 219 App. Div. 308 .)

Rappold v. Board of Education

112 Misc. 2d 388 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1982

Administrative convenience must fall when it collides with tenure rights (Matter of Steele v Board of Educ., 53 AD2d 674 , affd 42 NY2d 840 ). In the same vein, tenure rights must fall when rescheduling is impossible. … In this case, however, petitioner is protected by subdivision 2 of section 2510 of the Education Law, and before his rights can be denied, the board must prove that their denial is necessary (Matter of Amos v Board of Educ

Cin., Ham. & D. R. R. v. Brown

9 Ohio C.C. 198 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1894

Co. v.

Taddeo v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

3 Pa. D. & C.2d 454 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 7, 1955

This court recently reversed the zoning board of adjustment in the case of Lavelle v. … of Adjustment: Triolo et al. v.

Brown v. State of Illinois, Department of Labor

28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 101 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Oct 20, 1972

French v. Board of Education

99 Misc. 2d 882 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1979

Assn. v Father ( 71 Misc 2d 167 ) is misplaced. … State v Board of Trustees, Vil. of Cayuga Hgts., 42 AD2d 660 .)

Brady v. Board of Elections

178 Misc. 797 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1942

Application, pursuant to section 330 of the Election Law, to review action of board of elections of the city of New York. *798 This is an application for an order commanding the board of elections of the city of New York … (Halligan v. Hughes, N. Y. L. J. Mar. 18, 1940, p. 1237, Hooley, J.)

Zimmele v. American Plaster Board Co.

74 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 648 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1893

Brown v. Lower Southampton Township

30 Pa. D. & C.3d 474 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County · Jul 5, 1984

Brown’s name only but it is beneficially the property of both of appellants. … Medinger Appeal, *478 377 Pa. 217 , 104 A.2d 118 (1954); Soble Construction Co. v. Zoning Hearing Board, 16 Pa.

Levien v. Board of Zoning & Appeals

64 Misc. 2d 40 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 4, 1970

Moreover, the board’s decision, which is annexed as an exhibit to the petition, indicates that it computed the time to appeal from the issuance of the permit, whereas Matter of Pansa v. … Damiano (14 N Y 2d 356) and Matter of Highway Displays v.

Brown v. Philadelphia National Bank

21 Pa. D. & C.3d 205 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 21, 1981

Davis v. Chubb/Pacific Indemnity Group, 493 F. Supp. 89, 91 (E.D.Pa. 1980). … Plaintiffs’ reliance on Woodyatt v. Bank of Old York Road, 408 Pa. 257 , 182 A. 2d 500 (1962) is misplaced.

Boyer v. Board of Education

132 Misc. 2d 282 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1986

(See, Parochial Bus Sys. v Board of Educ., 60 NY2d 539 [1983]; Lazarus v Board of Educ., 73 AD2d 662 ; Panzeca, Inc. v Board of Educ., 29 NY2d 508.) Said dismissal is without prejudice. … (See, Matter of Baron v Mackreth, 30 AD2d 810 , affd 26 NY2d 1039 ; Dreyfuss v Board of Educ., 72 Misc 2d 703 , revd on other grounds 42 AD2d 845 .)

Daily Gazette Co. v. Town Board

111 Misc. 2d 303 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1981

During the town board meeting on the above date, the respondent board convened in executive session, allegedly pursuant to section 100 (subd 1, par d) of the Public Officers Law for the purpose of “discussions regarding proposed … The executive session was commenced after a motion duly made and seconded and unanimously carried by all members of the town board.