Case law

McDonald v. Teachers College Board

24 Ill. Ct. Cl. 438 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Feb 28, 1964

On November 7,1963, respondent, The Teachers College Board, filed a motion to dismiss this matter, and furnished therewith a proof of service of a copy on counsel for claimant. … McDonald, to recover from respondent, The Teachers College Board.

Board of Education v. State

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 429 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Sep 10, 1930

People ex rel. Brown v. Green

2 Thomp. & Cook 23 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1873

Bright v. Supervisors of Chenango, 18 Johns. 242; Mallory v. Supervisors of Cortland; Doubleday v. Supervisors of Broome, 2 Cow. 583; People v. Supervisors of Albany, 12 Wend. 257 ; see, also, Brady v. … Kelly v. Haws, 21 How. Pr. 117 . The order should be affirmed. IíTGBAHAM, P. J., concurred. Order affirmed.

State ex rel. Perry County v. Brown

11 Ohio Cir. Dec. 163 · Ohio Circuit Courts · May 15, 1899

Brown, as infirmary director aforesaid, out of the county funds in the treasury of said Perry county, Ohio.” … By authority Jones v.

Brown v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.

19 Ohio C.C. 510 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1899

This suit was brought by David Brown against The Toledo & Ohio Centra! Railway Company, upon two causes of action, fox injuries sustained by the plaintiff on account of alleged negligence of the defendant.

Brandt v. Zoning Board of Appeals

90 Misc. 2d 31 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1977

The zoning board of appeals after public hearing and after the receipt of the recommendations of the planning board denied the application based upon their conclusion that there was an inadequate submission and the specific … ; Hartnett v Segur, 21 AD2d 132 ; see, also, Matter o Plotinsky v Gardner, 27 Misc 2d 681 and cases cited thereunder.)

Kaplan v. Zoning Board

25 Pa. D. & C.4th 428 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Pike County · Jul 3, 1995

We may “only determine whether the board or the supervisors committed a manifest abuse of discretion or an error of law.” South Whitford v. Zoning Hearing Board, 157 Pa. … Commw. 387, 394-95 , 630 A.2d 903, 907 (1993) citing Mill Valley Associates v. Zoning Hearing Board of Tredyffrin Township, 126 Pa. Commw. 340 , 559 A.2d 985 (1989).

Brown v. State of Illinois, Department of Transportation

28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 316 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Jun 7, 1973

Lee v. Board of Education

120 Misc. 2d 809 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 1, 1983

(See Matter of Mitthauer v Patterson, 8 NY2d 37 ; Matter of Boddie v County of Westchester, 41 AD2d 546 , affd 33 NY2d 835 ; Matter of Lo Bello v McLaughlin, 39 AD2d 404 .) … Respondents contend that the penalty imposed by the board in the instant matter is precisely that imposed by the *811 Appellate Division, First Department, in Matter of Pauling v Smith ( 46 AD2d 759 ).

Board of Education v. Tuttle

125 Misc. 230 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1925

Griffin v. Mayor of Brooklyn ( 4 N. … In Matter of McAneny v. Board of Estimate & Apportionment *237 ( 232 N.

Board of Pharmacy v. Quackenbush & Co.

22 N.J. Misc. 334 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Oct 23, 1940

The legislative purpose of the New Jersey statute as was said in Board of Pharmacy v. Braunstein, 2 N. J. Mis. … The only recent case dealing with the problem here presented appears to be that of Kroger Grocery and Baking Co. v.

Board of School Inspectors v. State

12 Ill. Ct. Cl. 17 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Nov 13, 1941

The claim is based on expenditures incurred under authority of “An Act to Enable School Districts and Boards of Education to establish and maintain classes and schools for crippled children” approved June 19, 1923, in force … to such board of education, board of school inspectors or school directors on the warrant of the Auditor of Public Accounts out of any money in the treasury appropriated for such purposes, on presentation of proper vouchers

Brown v. New York Central Railroad

26 How. Pr. 32 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1863

Lake Shore & Michigan Railway Co. v. Brown

16 Ohio C.C. 269 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1896

Co. v. … Co. v.

Brown v. Grand Lodge Knights of Pythias

37 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 219 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1883

People v. Brown Clerk of Oneida County

7 Wend. 493 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1832

Ackerson v. Board of Sup'rs

18 N.Y.S. 219 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1892

Strough v. Board, 119 N. Y. 212 , 23 N. E. Rep. 552. … People v. Jaehne, 103 N. Y. 195 , 8 N. E. Rep. 374; Hecknann v. Pinkney, 81 N. Y. 211 ; People v. McClave, 99 N. Y. 83 , 1 N. E. Rep. 235; In re Kiernan, 62 N. Y. 457 ; People v. Supervisors, 73 N. Y. 173 .

Brown v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.

10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 278 · Lucas Circuit Court · Oct 6, 1899

This suit was brought by David Brown against the Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Company, upon two causes of action, for injuries sustained by the plaintiff on account of alleged negligence of the defendant.

Cin., Ham. & D. R. R. v. Brown

9 Ohio C.C. 198 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1894

Co. v.

Brown v. State of Illinois, Department of Corrections

29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 376 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Apr 25, 1974