Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.09s
Schnedler v. Board of Education
5 N.J. Misc. 753 · New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau · Jul 1, 1927
Cited 0 timesPublishedGittins v. Zoning Appeals Board
55 Va. Cir. 495 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Sep 12, 2000
Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Alexandria v. Fowler, 201 Va. 942, 948 , 114 S.E.2d 753 (1960). … County Board of Arlington v. Bratic, 237 Va. 221, 227 , 377 S.E.2d 368 (1989).
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. Scott County Tobacco Warehouses, Inc.
5 Va. Cir. 75 · Scott County Circuit Court · Feb 22, 1983
Pepper v. Litton, supra, 311 . … In Rowland v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedTeuchtler v. Board of Assessors
94 Misc. 2d 167 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1977
(Matter of Hellerstein v Assessor of Town of Islip, 37 NY2d 1 .) … (Matter of Hellerstein v Assessor of Town of Islip, supra, p 14. See, also, Matter of Andresen v Rice, 277 NY 271 .)
Cited 1 timesPublishedKokomo Straw Board Co. v. Inman
5 N.Y.S. 888 · New York Supreme Court · May 24, 1889
Tim v. Smith, 93 N. Y 91.
Cited 4 timesPublishedFlaminio v. Board of Education
97 Misc. 2d 722 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1979
Petitioner argues that the respondent, board of education, is merely a governmental agency of the State and possesses only delegated powers. … An affirmative conclusion is, however, suggested in Rapp v Carey ( 44 NY2d 157 ) and Evans v Carey ( 53 AD2d 109 ). Similarly the court need not reach the additional constitutional questions raised by the petitioner.
Cited 1 timesPublishedStrong v. Prentice Brown Stone Co.
31 N.Y.S. 144 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Dec 3, 1894
We will deliver to you No. 1 good stone at sixty-five cents per foot, on board of vessel alongside of your dock, * * * without commissions or handling in Cleveland. … Loffler v. Brestenstein, 19 Wkly. Dig. 444 ; Gorman v. Scholle, 13 Daly, 516 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedAbrahams v. Board of Education
26 Misc. 2d 624 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1960
Matter of Frankle v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 173 Misc. 1050 , mod. on other grounds 259 App. Div. 1006 , affd. 285 N. Y. 541 ). Obviously, compliance with said provision precluded petitioner’s appointment. … There *627 was here no mere error of judgment but, in my view, an error of fact which the board properly proceeded to correct (Matter of O’Brien v. Delaney, 255 App. Div. 385 ).
Cited 1 timesPublishedShelley v. Carlisle Zoning Hearing Board
18 Pa. D. & C.3d 337 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County · Feb 26, 1981
From this decision, applicant appealed to the Zoning Hearing Board of Car-lisle (hereinafter board). The board held a hearing on the appeal on March 17, 1980. … Section 908(8) is intended to prevent ex parte communications by the board. We are aware that section 908(8) has been held not to prohibit a view by the board with no parties present: Angelo v.
Cited 1 timesPublished41 Ohio Misc. 87 · Lake County Court of Common Pleas · Jun 3, 1974
In Ohio, two cases at the appellate level are cited by the parties: Laucher v. Simpson (1971), 28 Ohio App. 2d 195 , and Jacobs v. … This court approves the reasoning of Judge Bettman in Jacobs v. Beneduct, supra ( 35 Ohio Misc. 92 ).
Cited 2 timesPublished2024 NY Slip Op 50876(U) · The Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings · Jul 11, 2024
People v Brown ( 2024 NY Slip Op 50876(U) ) [*1] People v Brown 2024 NY Slip Op 50876(U) Decided on July 11, 2024 Criminal Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County Glick, J. … The prosecution must demonstrate that the disputed adjournments are excludable by reference to a statutory provision ( People v. Luperon, 85 NY2d 71, 77-78 [1995]; People v. Cortes, 80 NY2d 201 [1992]; People v.
Cited 1 timesUnpublishedAbukhdeir v. Code Enforcement Board
37 Fla. Supp. 2d 11 · Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · Jun 16, 1988
At the October 13, 1987, Code Enforcement Board hearing found Appellant in violation of the following: A. Commercial activity prohibited in a residential district; B. Unlawful conversion to a convenience store; and C. … It is further ORDERED, that the order of the Code Enforcement Board, City of Orlando, Florida, is hereby REVERSED AND REMANDED. DONE and ORDERED, this 16th day of June, 1988.
Cited 0 timesPublished3 Thomp. & Cook 155 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1874
Brady v. Mayor of New York, 2 Bosw. 178; S. C., affirmed by court of appeals, 30 N. Y. 313 ; McSpedon v. Stout, 4 Abb. 22; McSpedon v. Mayor of New York, 7 Bosw. 601 ; Peterson v. Mayor of New York, 17 N. … Y. 449 ; Bliss v. Mattison, 52 Barb. 349 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedEdenton v. Zoning Appeals Board
37 Va. Cir. 176 · Spotsylvania County Circuit Court · Jul 17, 1995
Foster v. Getter, 248 Va. 563 (1994); Prince William County v. Bond, 225 Va. 177 (1983); Board v. Combs, 200 Va. 471 (1959). In resolving this issue, no discretion is involved. … See, e.g., Knowlton v. Browning-Ferris, 220 Va. 571 (1979).
Cited 1 timesPublished66 Barb. 368 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1873
The precise ground on which the complaint was dismissed-was, that the plaintiff’ s claim was one which by law must be presented to and passed on by the board of supervisors, and that it having been so presented, passed upon … If it does, this action cannot be maintained, as the claim must be presented and passed upon by the board of supervisors, and their action is final.
Cited 1 timesPublishedLake Shore & Michigan Railway Co. v. Brown
16 Ohio C.C. 269 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1896
Co. v. … Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople v. Brown Clerk of Oneida County
7 Wend. 493 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1832
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Grand Lodge Knights of Pythias
37 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 219 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1883
Cited 0 timesPublished6 Thomp. & Cook 164 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1875
Bloom v. Burdick, 1 Hill, 131 ; Stone v. Miller, 62 Barb. 431 , 442; Miller v. Brinkerhoff, 4 Denio, 118 ; Staples v. Fairchild, 3 N. Y. 41, 46 ; People v. Soper, 7 id. 428, 431. … Chemung Canal Bank v. Judson, 8 N. Y. 254 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. New York Central Railroad
26 How. Pr. 32 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1863
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna