Case law

Davidson v. Board of Education

38 Ohio Law. Abs. 6 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · Mar 2, 1943

In disposing of *11 a similar claim which was asserted as a valid reason for refusing to tender a married woman teacher a contract as required by §7690-2 GC, the Supreme Court in Bishop et al v Boards of Education, 139 Oh … Paragraph seven of the syllabi of Bishop, et al., v Boards of Education, supra, reads: “7.

Board of Education v. Alonso

60 Misc. 2d 709 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1969

to constitute the whole local school board. … It provides that “ The board of education of the city school district of the city of New York * * * shall divide the city school district into such number of local school board districts as such board in its discretion may

People v. Brown

2024 NY Slip Op 50840(U) · The Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings · Jul 3, 2024

People v Brown ( 2024 NY Slip Op 50840(U) ) [*1] People v Brown 2024 NY Slip Op 50840(U) Decided on July 3, 2024 Criminal Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County Glick, J. … The prosecution must demonstrate that the disputed adjournments are excludable by reference to a statutory provision ( People v. Luperon, 85 NY2d 71, 77-78 [1995]; People v. Cortes, 80 NY2d 201 [1992]; People v.

Dachs v. Board of Education

53 Misc. 2d 13 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1967

Reed v. Board of Appeals

51 Misc. 2d 88 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1966

Since it is clear from the record before the board that petitioner is entitled to the permit for which he applied as a matter of right, the decision of the board is annulled and the matter is remanded to the board with directions … regulations of the use district in which it is situated ”, for the regulations of the use district deal not only with use in the strict sense but also with area requirements, (and see the reference in Matter of Faranda v.

Board of Health v. Noyes

71 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 634 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1892

Thomas v. Board of Supervisors

52 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 588 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1887

Board of Supervisors v. Frean

1 Thomp. & Cook 431 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1873

The complaint charges the defendant with presenting claims to the board of supervisors of Richmond county, which were not legal claims against the county, were for services not rendered to the county, or for which the county … The complaint further charges that the defendant knew the claims were not legal, and fraudulently procured a warrant for payment of the same of the *433 board of supervisors.

Wood v. Board of Supervisors

17 N.Y.S. 603 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1891

Board of Commissioners v. Purdy

22 How. Pr. 506 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1862

name of the board under the- provisions of the law. … If every one may prosecute in the name of the board, unless the board choose to object, the provision in respect to laying the complaint before the board, with reasonable proof of a violation of the law, is nullified and

Pumpelly v. Board of Trustees

84 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1894

Board of Commissioners v. Glennon

28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 244 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1880

of the town or city in which the alleged penalty was incurred, “ except in such towns or cities as have no overseers of the poor, in which case said penalties shall be sued for, and recovered* by and in the name of the Board … be paid into the city treasury.” ‘ Must the Commissioner of Charities sue for the penalty in question, or the Board of Excise ?

Eickelberg v. Board of Health

54 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 371 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1888

.: It is the duty of the boards of health organized in this State to designate the persons who shall grant burial permits for the burial of the dead, and transit permits for the transportation of dead bodies of persons which … The boards of health must designate persons who shall grant permits for the burial of the dead and transit permits.

Board of Supervisors v. Seabury

32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 564 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1881

Board of Supervisors v. Seabury

33 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 393 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1882

Seeley v. Board of Supervisors

41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 636 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1885

Birdsall v. Board of Supervisors

42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 669 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1885

Shore v. Board of Supervisors

2 N.Y. St. Rep. 317 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1886

Baka v. Board of Education

11 Misc. 2d 441 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1958

Lucio v. … (Haskell v. Miller, 221 App. Div. 48, 49 , affd. 246 N. Y. 618 .) In determining the effect of a release, the basic inquiry is the intention of the parties and the purpose for which the release was given (Simon v.

People ex rel. Brown v. Carpenter

11 N.Y.S. 852 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1890

People v. Protectory, supra. In the case of Annie Brown the commitment states notice to, and the presence of, Ann Eliza Brown, who is the mother of these children. … Bank v. Judson, 8 N. Y. 254 ; Ferguson v. Crawford, 70 N. Y. 253 ; Craig v. Town of Andes, 93 N. Y. 405 . The justice has not been vested with arbitrary authority over these proceedings.