Case law

Dachs v. Board of Education

53 Misc. 2d 13 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1967

Reed v. Board of Appeals

51 Misc. 2d 88 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1966

Since it is clear from the record before the board that petitioner is entitled to the permit for which he applied as a matter of right, the decision of the board is annulled and the matter is remanded to the board with directions … regulations of the use district in which it is situated ”, for the regulations of the use district deal not only with use in the strict sense but also with area requirements, (and see the reference in Matter of Faranda v.

Thomas v. Board of Supervisors

52 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 588 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1887

Birdsall v. Board of Supervisors

42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 669 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1885

Board of Supervisors v. Seabury

33 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 393 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1882

Seeley v. Board of Supervisors

41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 636 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1885

Board of Health v. Noyes

71 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 634 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1892

Eickelberg v. Board of Health

54 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 371 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1888

.: It is the duty of the boards of health organized in this State to designate the persons who shall grant burial permits for the burial of the dead, and transit permits for the transportation of dead bodies of persons which … The boards of health must designate persons who shall grant permits for the burial of the dead and transit permits.

Board of Commissioners v. Glennon

28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 244 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1880

of the town or city in which the alleged penalty was incurred, “ except in such towns or cities as have no overseers of the poor, in which case said penalties shall be sued for, and recovered* by and in the name of the Board … be paid into the city treasury.” ‘ Must the Commissioner of Charities sue for the penalty in question, or the Board of Excise ?

Board of Supervisors v. Frean

1 Thomp. & Cook 431 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1873

The complaint charges the defendant with presenting claims to the board of supervisors of Richmond county, which were not legal claims against the county, were for services not rendered to the county, or for which the county … The complaint further charges that the defendant knew the claims were not legal, and fraudulently procured a warrant for payment of the same of the *433 board of supervisors.

Shore v. Board of Supervisors

2 N.Y. St. Rep. 317 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1886

Board of Supervisors v. Seabury

32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 564 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1881

Pumpelly v. Board of Trustees

84 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1894

Board of Commissioners v. Purdy

22 How. Pr. 506 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1862

name of the board under the- provisions of the law. … If every one may prosecute in the name of the board, unless the board choose to object, the provision in respect to laying the complaint before the board, with reasonable proof of a violation of the law, is nullified and

Wood v. Board of Supervisors

17 N.Y.S. 603 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1891

Burrows v. Board of Assessors

116 Misc. 2d 133 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1982

Board of Assessors of County of Nassau, 54 NY2d 547, 553, 554 ). * Other local taxing authorities were recalcitrant and were ordered to reassess. … Justice Weiss within the context of an equal protection challenge in Matter of Archer v Town of North Greenbush ( 105 Misc 2d 60, 65 ).

Schnedler v. Board of Education

5 N.J. Misc. 753 · New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau · Jul 1, 1927

Lynch v. Board of Assessors

163 Misc. 2d 703 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1994

As stated by Justice Ingrassia in Cippolone v City of White Plains (NYLJ, July 8, 1991, at 27, cols 2, 3, affd sub nom. … (Matter of AT&T Information Systems v. Donohue, 113 AD2d *705 395, 400 .)” (Cippolone v City of White Plains, supra, at 27, col 3.)

People v. Brown

2024 NY Slip Op 50840(U) · The Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings · Jul 3, 2024

People v Brown ( 2024 NY Slip Op 50840(U) ) [*1] People v Brown 2024 NY Slip Op 50840(U) Decided on July 3, 2024 Criminal Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County Glick, J. … The prosecution must demonstrate that the disputed adjournments are excludable by reference to a statutory provision ( People v. Luperon, 85 NY2d 71, 77-78 [1995]; People v. Cortes, 80 NY2d 201 [1992]; People v.

Board of Managers v. Rios

166 Misc. 2d 381 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1995

The plaintiff is the board of managers of Artist Lake Condominium. It is charged with the responsibility of enforcing the rules and regulations relating to the facility. … Di Pino, 109 AD2d 235 [1985]; Barone v Frie, 99 AD2d 129 [1984]).