Case law

Corning v. Board of Elections

113 Misc. 2d 707 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1982

The petition further seeks an order directing the Boards of Elections in said counties to keep the polls open for voting in the aforesaid primary election from the hours of 6:00 a.m. until 9:00 p.m. … (Illinois Elections Bd. v Socialist Workers Party, 440 US 173,184 .) Thus, in order to meet constitutional requirements, the challenged statute must serve a compelling interest (Storer v Brown, 415 US 724, 736 ).

Battaglia v. Board of Education

3 Misc. 2d 214 · New York Supreme Court · May 22, 1956

Brown, Jr., J. Application under section 50-e of the General Municipal Law for leave to serve a notice of claim upon the Board of Education after the expiration of the statutory period. … (Natoli v. Board of Educ. of City of Norwich, 277 App. Div. 915 , affd. 303 N. Y. 646 .) In either case an infant thirteen years of age has not the mental capacity to protect his or her rights.

Greene v. Board of Supervisors

13 Va. Cir. 4 · Virginia Circuit Court · Feb 6, 1987

FITZPATRICK This action arose out of the Board of Supervisors’ alleged wrongful adoption of a street vacation ordinance. … The Board’s only statutory obligation, however, was to advertise a public hearing on the proposal. Ya. Code Section 15.1-431.

Brown v. West Virginia Department of Highways

9 Ct. Cl. 240 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1973

Brown the sum of $750.00, to Clarence D. Brown the sum of $600.00, to Marlene J. Downey the sum of $100.00, and to Harry Ellison the sum of $1500.00. Award of $750.00 to Carl A. Brown. Award of $600.00 to Clarence E. … Brown. Award of $100.00 to Marlene J. Downey. Award of $1500 to Harry Ellison.

Burrows v. Board of Assessors

116 Misc. 2d 133 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1982

Board of Assessors of County of Nassau, 54 NY2d 547, 553, 554 ). * Other local taxing authorities were recalcitrant and were ordered to reassess. … Justice Weiss within the context of an equal protection challenge in Matter of Archer v Town of North Greenbush ( 105 Misc 2d 60, 65 ).

Lynch v. Board of Assessors

163 Misc. 2d 703 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1994

As stated by Justice Ingrassia in Cippolone v City of White Plains (NYLJ, July 8, 1991, at 27, cols 2, 3, affd sub nom. … (Matter of AT&T Information Systems v. Donohue, 113 AD2d *705 395, 400 .)” (Cippolone v City of White Plains, supra, at 27, col 3.)

Lee v. Board of Governors

48 Ill. Ct. Cl. 201 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Aug 22, 1995

(Berger v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois (1988), 40 Ill. Ct. Cl. 120, 124 .) … Secor v. State (1991), 44 Ill. Ct. Cl. 215, 217 . In this case there is no question the State had actual notice of the defective condition of the chair.

Opert v. Board of Education

76 Misc. 2d 1025 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1974

This cause of action, seemingly, is an attempt to come within the principles stated in Matter of Tischler v. *1028 Board of Educ. of Monroe Woodbury Cent. School Dist. No. 1 (37 A D 2d 261). … not necessary for this court to render a decision whether the petitioner has failed to bring her petition within the four-month Statute of Limitations set forth by CPLR 217, although it would appear from Matter of Gates v.

People v. Brown

2024 NY Slip Op 50840(U) · The Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings · Jul 3, 2024

People v Brown ( 2024 NY Slip Op 50840(U) ) [*1] People v Brown 2024 NY Slip Op 50840(U) Decided on July 3, 2024 Criminal Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County Glick, J. … The prosecution must demonstrate that the disputed adjournments are excludable by reference to a statutory provision ( People v. Luperon, 85 NY2d 71, 77-78 [1995]; People v. Cortes, 80 NY2d 201 [1992]; People v.

Board of Managers v. Rios

166 Misc. 2d 381 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1995

The plaintiff is the board of managers of Artist Lake Condominium. It is charged with the responsibility of enforcing the rules and regulations relating to the facility. … Di Pino, 109 AD2d 235 [1985]; Barone v Frie, 99 AD2d 129 [1984]).

Le Couteulx v. Board of Supervisors

7 Barb. 249 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1849

Board of Health v. Jones

1 Miles 28 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 22, 1835

The first section provides for the removal, by the Board of Health, of any nuisance existing upon unoccupied property, where the owner is non resident, or cannot be found by the messenger of the board. … The second section makes the expenses of such removal a lien upon the premises, and directs the board to file the claim therefor against the owner, or reputed owner, and to proceed in this court by scire facias, in like manner

Swiderski v. Board of Education

95 Misc. 2d 931 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1978

Smith v. Board of Review

17 Ohio Misc. 36 · Clark County Court of Common Pleas · Nov 14, 1968

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Review, Bureau of Employment Services, Bureau of Unemployment Compensation, made on May 13, 1968, disallowing claimant’s appeal and affirming a decision of the referee denying

Wittenmeyer v. Board of Education

6 Ohio Cir. Dec. 258 · Cuyahoga Circuit Court · Mar 30, 1895

Y., Loughran v. Ross, there was a clause-in the lease that the premises should be surrendered' in good condition, natural; wear and decay only excepted, at the expiration of the lease. In Watriss v. … The Michigan case is that of Amelia Kerr, administratrix, v. Solomon O.

Norwood v. Board of Elections

31 Ohio C.C. Dec. 36 · Hamilton Circuit Court · Oct 28, 1910

In these cases the clerk of the board of state supervisors of elections for Hamilton county, Mr. George A. … And we are further of the opinion, following the case of Dutten v.

Board of Trustees v. Satterfield

2 Ohio C.C. 86 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Nov 15, 1886

the survey with any title against the United States or its grantee, but only gave the first locator a pre-emption or right to a new and valid location as against any subsequent locator, as stated by Judge Ranney in Price v.

Eckstein v. Board of Education

10 Ohio C.C. 480 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Apr 15, 1894

, or the clerk of the board of education of *482 such special or village district; and when any such lines have been so changed, they shall not be altered by any board or boards of education until after the expiration of … Section 3948 roads: "It shall be the duty of such board or boards to meet and consider the petition within thirty days from the time the same is filed, but on failure to do so within sixty days of such time, or if the board

Board of Education v. Townsend

15 Ohio C.C. 674 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Apr 15, 1898

The facts of the case are agreed upon by the parties, and are: The said board of education,and defendant'Townsend, made an agreement in writing, on November 7, 1895, in which the said board agreed to make a proper conveyance … Townsend procured the new site, had title thereto vested in the board of education, and done and performed all the other stipulations of his contract, to the satisfaction of the said board, except the removal and re-building

Gilbert v. Board of Education

11 Ohio Cir. Dec. 552 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jul 1, 1901

Subdivision 6 of Sec. 3988 is as follows: “None but the lowest responsible bid shall be accepted; but the board may, in its discretion, reject all the bids, or accept any bid for both labor and material, which is the lowest … Under this provision, although some items in a bid for the entire improvement may be higher than the same items in another bid, still if the bid is the lowest in the aggregate the board may, in its discretion, accept it.