Case law

Brown v. Clifford

7 Lans. 46 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1872

(Hodges v. Tennessee Marine and Fire Ins. Company, 4 Seld., 416; Despard v. Walbridge, 15 N. Y., 374 -379; Vandusen v. Worrell, 8 Keyes, 311 ; Loveridge v. Oyer, cited by Hunt, J.; Sturtevant v. Sturtevant, 20 N. … If an agreement between Brown and defendant that the latter should advance moneys in addition to what he had already advanced to and for said Brown, and that Brown should execute and deliver a deed of said land as security

Meech v. Brown

4 Abb. Pr. 19 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Nov 15, 1856

Brown v. Elliott

4 Daly 329 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Dec 15, 1872

Y. 248 ; McDonell v. Buffum, 31 How. Pr. 154 ; Deyo v. N. Y. Central R. R. Co. 34 N. Y. 9 ; Grippen v. Same, 40 N. Y. 34 ).' … Y. 279 ; Wehle v. Haviland, 42 How. Pr. 399 ).

Brown v. Upfold

204 Misc. 416 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1953

Brown, a passenger in the TTpfold automobile was injured. Dougherty sustained serious personal injuries and property damage. Dougherty filed a cross action against the defendant, TTpfold. … In Auchello v. Brooklyn Bus Corp. ( 257 App.

Brown v. Butler

12 N.Y.S. 810 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1890

People v. Brown

40 Misc. 3d 821 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 26, 2013

(People v Bright, 71 NY2d 376, 382 [1988].) … When attempting to interpret a statute, courts are obliged to effectuate the legislative intent. (.People v Finnegan, 85 NY2d 53 [1995].)

Brown v. Fay

6 Wend. 392 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1831

The language of the statute is very board: “ That no goods or chattels whatsoever in or upon the demised premises. shall be liable to be taken by virtue of any execution,” &c. unless the party suing the execution pay the … Burnet a year’s rent, pursuant to 8 Anne, ch. 14, but it was held, that this was not a case within the statute, which extends only to the immediate landlord; and the case of Carr v.

Leland v. Brown

136 Misc. 493 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1930

Board of Missions, 102 N. Y. 99 ; McWhorter v. Stewart, 39 App. … (McWhorter v. Stewart, supra.) I hold that the mortgage is valid as against both defendants, Willi am H. Brown and Flora Brown, and that the plaintiff is entitled to the rehef demanded' in the complaint.

Cronly v. Brown

12 Wend. 271 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1835

People v. Brown

148 Misc. 2d 70 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1989

]; Stumpf v State, 749 P2d 880 [Alaska App 1988], cert denied 109 S Ct 2075 [1989]; State v Zinn, 106 NM 544 , 746 P2d 650 [1987]; State v Comeau, 531 A2d 290 [Me 1987]; Booth v State, 306 Md 313, 508 A2d 976 [1986].) … Brown and the codefendant Mr. O’Donald, entering the lot to Alex and Henry’s and climbing over a fence.

Brown v. Wilbur

8 Wend. 657 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1832

In the case of Denning v. Smith, 3 Johns. Ch. R. 332, Judson was the purchaser at the sale, under the statute, by the commissioners, and received a deed of the premises. … Cook et. al. v.

Jetter v. Brown

200 Misc. 718 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1951

Jetter was negligent and that William Webster Brown was not negligent, bars recovery by the plaintiff in this action. The motion should be denied. Good Health Dairy Products Corp. v. Emery ( 275 N. … (Portland Gold Mining Co. v. Stratton’s Independence, 158 F. 63 ; Note, 16 L. R. A. [N. S.] 677.)

Brown v. Richter

27 N.Y.S. 1094 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1894

An examination of the case of Kennedy v. … In the case of Tilden v. Green a different question arose.

Brown v. Bradshaw

1 Duer 199 · The Superior Court of New York City · Oct 30, 1852

McNulty, “ Bought of Brown & Corning, “ Wholesale and Retail “ Dealers in Lumber. “Terms Cash.” … He said he would pay the men that day, and asked if there were any other bills on the buildings, except those for which he was accountable, mentioning that of Brown & Corning, and he. said those would 'be paid to-morrow.

Brown v. Moses

191 Misc. 360 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1948

Act, § 1296; Matter of Brenner v. Bruckman, 253 App. Div. 607 , appeal dismissed 278 N. Y. 503 ). … Div. 757 ; Matter of Tiernan v. Walsh, 268 App. Div. 962 , affd. 294 N. Y. 299 ).

Kenworthy v. Brown

45 Misc. 292 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1904

.: Hemmens v. Nelson ( 138 N. Y. 517 ) is not in point.

Rabenold v. Zoning Hearing Board

30 Pa. D. & C.4th 425 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Carbon County · Feb 29, 1996

Trettel v. Zoning Hearing Board of Harrison Township, 540 Pa. 430 , 658 A.2d 741 (1995); Limley v. Zoning Hearing Board of Port Vue Borough, 533 Pa. 340 , 625 A.2d 54 (1993). … Valley View Civic Association v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 501 Pa. 550, 555 , 462 A.2d 637, 640 (1983).

Brown v. Ryckman

12 How. Pr. 313 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Mar 15, 1856

Brown is the owner and real party in interest, create no issue, and amount to a mere traverse, which is not recognized by the Code.

Gill v. Brown

12 Johns. 385 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1815

The reasoning of the court in Callen v. Queensbury, (1 Brown’s Ch. … In Hodgson v.

Brown v. Birdsall

29 Barb. 549 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1859

(De Mautort v. Saunders, 1 B. & Adol. 398.) Second. The two dormant partners being residents of other states, no effectual remedy in this state could be had against them.