Case law

Zolitor v. Election Board

48 Pa. D. & C.3d 544 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Feb 23, 1988

Wilson v. Wallingford Inc., v. Township of Nether Providence, 85 Pa. Commw. 104 , 481 A.2d 692 (1984). … See e.g., Wright v. Beaver County Board of Elections, 25 Beaver Leg. J. 7 (1963).

Brown v. West Virginia Department of Highways

9 Ct. Cl. 240 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1973

Brown the sum of $750.00, to Clarence D. Brown the sum of $600.00, to Marlene J. Downey the sum of $100.00, and to Harry Ellison the sum of $1500.00. Award of $750.00 to Carl A. Brown. Award of $600.00 to Clarence E. … Brown. Award of $100.00 to Marlene J. Downey. Award of $1500 to Harry Ellison.

Goldhaber v. Board of Elections

55 Misc. 2d 111 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1967

(Matter of Robbins v. Chamberlain, 297 N. Y. 108 ; Matter of Reiner v. Board of Elections, 20 N Y 2d 865.) The studies carried out by petitioner are in furtherance of his teaching profession. This is his chosen career.

Spano v. Board of Education

68 Misc. 2d 804 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1972

In emulation of Serrano v. … v.

Board of Education v. Sobol

164 Misc. 2d 411 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1995

There is no reason to annul his decision (Matter of Board of Educ. v Nyquist, 28 AD2d 936, 938 [3d Dept 1967]). Accordingly, the petition herein should be dismissed. … Application of equitable estoppel against a school board has been upheld by the Third Department (see, Matter of Ashton v Board of Educ., 22 AD2d 992 [3d Dept 1964], affg 44 Misc 2d 780 [Sup Ct, Saratoga County 1963]).

People v. Brown

2024 NY Slip Op 50876(U) · The Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings · Jul 11, 2024

People v Brown ( 2024 NY Slip Op 50876(U) ) [*1] People v Brown 2024 NY Slip Op 50876(U) Decided on July 11, 2024 Criminal Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County Glick, J. … The prosecution must demonstrate that the disputed adjournments are excludable by reference to a statutory provision ( People v. Luperon, 85 NY2d 71, 77-78 [1995]; People v. Cortes, 80 NY2d 201 [1992]; People v.

Karin v. Board of Education

65 Misc. 2d 179 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1970

Two of the board members, although present, abstained from voting because they were not present at the first meeting of the board. … (Christ v. Lake Erie Distrs., 51 Misc 2d 811 , affd. 28 A D 2d 817.)

Keesee v. Board of Education

37 Misc. 2d 414 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1962

And besides, her judgment (in effect) that children should not be put into this game at all until they have been drilled and practiced in its skills, is supported by common sense and experience (see, e.g., Brooks v. … Board of Educ. of City of N. 7., 29 Misc 2d 19 , affd. 15 A D 2d 495). In that case the jury found for the plaintiff and I refused to set the verdict aside.

Schmiedl v. Board of Trustees

46 Ill. Ct. Cl. 312 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Jun 23, 1994

No payment or other action to compensate Todd has been taken on this claim by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois. … This court has exclusive jurisdiction to hear all claims sounding in tort against the Board of Trustees and the University of Illinois.

Watson v. Board of Education

91 Misc. 323 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1915

This was under the schedule adopted by the board of education July 16, 1900, and taking effect May third of that year. … The law itself did this, and no resolution of the board could reduce them. For the purpose of preventing a .reduction this resolution of the board was entirely unnecessary.

Orlando v. Board of Supervisors

53 Misc. 2d 377 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1966

Chemung County Bd. of Supervisors, 50 Misc 2d 418 ); Erie (Graham v. Board of Supervisors [Sup. Ct., Kelly, J., June 28, 1966]); Herkimer (Morris v. Board of Supervisors, 50 Misc 2d 929 ); Monroe (Matter of Goldstein v. … Rockefeller, 45 Misc 2d 778 ); Oneida (Treiber v. Lanigan, 48 Misc 2d 434 ); Onondaga (Barzelay v. Board of Supervisors, 47 Misc 2d 1013 ); Schenectady (Michl v.

Houston v. Board of Supervisors

72 Pa. D. & C. 414 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County · Mar 29, 1950

The plaintiffs believe and therefore aver that at some time in the past the Board of Supervisors of Franklin Township, with the consent of the electors, did levy a tax of two mills, for two years, for fire protection purposes … The question therefore is whether the board of supervisors, having with the consent of the voters previously exercised the power of levying a tax of two mills for fire protection purposes, can do it again.

People v. Brown

2024 NY Slip Op 50840(U) · The Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings · Jul 3, 2024

People v Brown ( 2024 NY Slip Op 50840(U) ) [*1] People v Brown 2024 NY Slip Op 50840(U) Decided on July 3, 2024 Criminal Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County Glick, J. … The prosecution must demonstrate that the disputed adjournments are excludable by reference to a statutory provision ( People v. Luperon, 85 NY2d 71, 77-78 [1995]; People v. Cortes, 80 NY2d 201 [1992]; People v.

Gordon v. Community School Board

83 Misc. 2d 941 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 19, 1975

, as required by the Rules and Regulations of the Board of Education of the City School District of New York governing grievances against Community School Boards or members”. … to the community school board or member(s) for proper resolution.

Feasel v. Board of Education

24 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 329 · Seneca County Court of Common Pleas · Nov 29, 1922

S., 376, the State v. Roney; in 83 O. S., 146, Scheu v. State of Ohio; 86 O. S., 80, Sipe, Auditor, v. State ex rel; 88 O. S. 71, State ex rel City of Toledo, v. Lynch, Auditor; 91 O. … S., page 501, Swetland et al v. Miles.

Mills v. Board of Equalization

1 Cin. Sup. Ct. Rep. 566 · Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · Jul 1, 1871

If the former, the defendants must disregard it; if the latter only, it can be amended by the Board of Equalization in the mode prescribed by the statute. … fairly be supposed to enter into the estimation of real estate by those who have especially devoted themselves to its purchase and sale; for thus a conclusion may be reached both just to the state and the property holder. v

Polhamus v. Board of Education

11 Ohio Cir. Dec. 366 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 27, 1900

This case ol Polhamus against the Board of Education ol Cleveland is here on a motion for an order restraining the board from performing, or paying any money upon a contract referred to in the pleadings, until the case can … because it would be the same then — as everybody was entitled to bid upon the system — as though the board had named one system in the call for bids.

Youmans v. Board of Education

7 Ohio Cir. Dec. 269 · Licking Circuit Court · Oct 15, 1896

It is claimed that this was not in accordance with the rule laid down by the supreme court in the case of Board of Education v. Best, 52 O. … Edward Kibler and John David Jones, on behalf of the Board of Education, etc. In School District No. 2, Oxford Township, Butler Co. v. Dilman, 22 O.

Mueller v. Board of Education

11 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 113 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Mar 15, 1911

City of Lancaster v. Miller, 58 O. S., 558: Syl. 1. … The only case cited by the attorney for plaintiff in support of this- theory is that of State, ex rel, v. Board of Education, 42 O. S., 374: Syl. 3.

Stinson v. Board of Education

24 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 273 · Licking County Court of Common Pleas · Sep 15, 1922

Thereupon the board attempted to and was proceeding to issue bonds in the sum of $80,000, when a temporary injunction was issued by this court against the board. … Has the board of education authority to issue said bonds under Section 7630-1 of the General Code?