Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

0.62s

  • McGreevey v. Board of Education

    10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 724 · Lucas Circuit Court · Mar 3, 1900

    Upon this question Beaver v. Trustees, 19 Ohio St., 97 ., is in point. … Another case is a decision of the Supreme Court in Buchanan Bridge Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Minor v. Board of Control

    20 Ohio C.C. 4 · Butler Circuit Court · Oct 15, 1899

    If so, the board was authorized to act. If not, it had no such right, And we find that such -Was not the case. … If the board has not the right to improve, the assessments will be invalid, and the city itself will have to pay the cost of it.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Polhamus v. Board of Education

    21 Ohio C.C. 257 · Cuyahoga Circuit Court · Oct 15, 1900

    This case of Polhamus against the Board of Education of Cleveland is here on a motion for an order restraining the board from performing, or paying any money upon a con *258 tract referred to in the pleadings, until the case … it would be the same them — -as everybody was entitled to bid upon the system — 'as though the board had named one system in the call for bids.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Presley v. Board of Education

    69 Misc. 2d 118 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1972

    The respondent Board of Education did not grant a teacher’s contract to the petitioner for the school year commencing September 1,1971. … Starting on September 1, 1962 she recommenced full-time work as an elementary teacher with the respondent board. We have not been told why or on what basis she did this or why or on what basis the board hired her.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Spinelli v. Board of Trustees

    67 Misc. 2d 503 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1971

    The rule laid down in Matter of Anonymous v. New York City Tr. Auth. (7 N Y 2d 769) is applicable here. The indiscretions of one’s youth shall not preclude him a livelihood as an adult.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. McCord

    62 Misc. 2d 934 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1970

    Plaintiff, the Board of Education of the City of New York, moves for a preliminary injunction against the defendants to enjoin their alleged illegal acts and course of conduct in attempting to set up a “ complaint table ’ … The purpose of the table, they say, was twofold: (1) to screen intruders, and (2) to permit students to channel their individual problems through this unilateral “ board ” to the proper administrative authorities. *935 The

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gardner v. Board of Health

    6 Sandf. 153 · The Superior Court of New York City · Sep 28, 1850

    The Board being composed of numerous members, its duties devolved mainly upon this committee. … This action is brought against the Board of Health, eo nomine, treating them as a corporate body. The first question which arises is, Is this Board such a corporation?

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Donovan v. Board of Education

    14 Jones & S. 565 · The Superior Court of New York City · May 3, 1880

    The Board of Education was not the employer or responsible superior of the persons by whose negligence the accident occurred.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Gorga

    13 Misc. 2d 2 · New York County Courts · Jun 11, 1958

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Margolin v. Teachers' Retirement Board

    36 Misc. 2d 1025 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1962

    Act, art. 78) directing respondent, Teachers’ Retirement Board of the City of New York, to pay her a lump sum which she claims she is entitled to receive under section 245 of the Military Law and the 1961 amendment (L. 1961 … system who is an honorably discharged member of the armed forces of the United States who has served as such during ‘‘ time of war ’ ’, after attaining the age of 50 years to retire upon written application to the retirement board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Monteverde v. Board of Supervisors

    28 N.Y.S. 918 · New York Supreme Court · May 14, 1894

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mott v. Board of Supervisors

    17 N.Y.S. 599 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1891

    Held, (1) that the resolutions of the board of supervisors mentioned in question 1, stated in the submission, do not prevent the county from interposing the statute of limitations; (2) that the plaintiff is entitled to recover

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gilbert v. Board of Supervisors

    71 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 634 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1892

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Supervisors v. Betts

    60 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 638 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1889

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Supervisors v. Miller

    11 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 71 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1875

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Board of Supervisors

    11 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 145 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1875

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Horan v. Board of Appeals

    8 Misc. 2d 663 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1957

    within the meaning of the applicable statute ” (see resolution of the board, par. 6). … matter to the board for decision on the basis of written statements and arguments.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Mapes

    54 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 636 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1888

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lee v. Board of Supervisors

    36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 617 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1883

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Pidgeon

    30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 346 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1880

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.