Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.08s
14 Ct. Cl. 103 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Feb 1, 1982
During a meeting of the Board of Regents in April, 1980, the Board requested the resignation of the claimant and informed him that his services would no longer be needed as of *104 May 31, 1980, with the month of June, 1980 … It is the position of the Board that administrative officials serve at the will and pleasure of the Board, fhat services of the claimant could be terminated at any time, and that the claimant was not under contract during
Cited 0 timesPublished1 Miles 28 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 22, 1835
The first section provides for the removal, by the Board of Health, of any nuisance existing upon unoccupied property, where the owner is non resident, or cannot be found by the messenger of the board. … The second section makes the expenses of such removal a lien upon the premises, and directs the board to file the claim therefor against the owner, or reputed owner, and to proceed in this court by scire facias, in like manner
Cited 0 timesPublishedGerling v. Board of Zoning Appeals
11 Misc. 2d 84 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1957
Board of Appeals, 301 N. Y. 215 ; Y. W. H. Assn. v. Board of Standards and Appeals, 266 N. Y. 270 ; Matter of Clark v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 301 N. Y. 86 ; Matter of Hickox v. Griffin, 298 N. … Y. 365 ; Matter of Freitag v. *92 Marsh, 280 App. Div. 934 ; Matter of North Titus Residential Assn. v. Board of Appeals, 205 Misc. 518 ; Matter of Stillman v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 222 App.
Reversed on other grounds by Gerling v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 6 A.D.2d 247 (1958)Cited 10 timesPublished13 Ct. Cl. 195 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Apr 1, 1980
Cited 0 timesPublished12 Ct. Cl. 270 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 9, 1979
Cited 0 timesPublished10 Ct. Cl. 80 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Feb 11, 1974
of Architectural Boards in Atlanta, Georgia. … No effort was made to encumber the funds of the Board during the fiscal year which ended June 30, 1973.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSwiderski v. Board of Education
95 Misc. 2d 931 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1978
Cited 0 timesPublished17 Ohio Misc. 36 · Clark County Court of Common Pleas · Nov 14, 1968
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Review, Bureau of Employment Services, Bureau of Unemployment Compensation, made on May 13, 1968, disallowing claimant’s appeal and affirming a decision of the referee denying
Cited 0 timesPublishedWittenmeyer v. Board of Education
6 Ohio Cir. Dec. 258 · Cuyahoga Circuit Court · Mar 30, 1895
Y., Loughran v. Ross, there was a clause-in the lease that the premises should be surrendered' in good condition, natural; wear and decay only excepted, at the expiration of the lease. In Watriss v. … The Michigan case is that of Amelia Kerr, administratrix, v. Solomon O.
Cited 0 timesPublished31 Ohio C.C. Dec. 36 · Hamilton Circuit Court · Oct 28, 1910
In these cases the clerk of the board of state supervisors of elections for Hamilton county, Mr. George A. … And we are further of the opinion, following the case of Dutten v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Trustees v. Satterfield
2 Ohio C.C. 86 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Nov 15, 1886
the survey with any title against the United States or its grantee, but only gave the first locator a pre-emption or right to a new and valid location as against any subsequent locator, as stated by Judge Ranney in Price v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEckstein v. Board of Education
10 Ohio C.C. 480 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Apr 15, 1894
, or the clerk of the board of education of *482 such special or village district; and when any such lines have been so changed, they shall not be altered by any board or boards of education until after the expiration of … Section 3948 roads: "It shall be the duty of such board or boards to meet and consider the petition within thirty days from the time the same is filed, but on failure to do so within sixty days of such time, or if the board
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Townsend
15 Ohio C.C. 674 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Apr 15, 1898
The facts of the case are agreed upon by the parties, and are: The said board of education,and defendant'Townsend, made an agreement in writing, on November 7, 1895, in which the said board agreed to make a proper conveyance … Townsend procured the new site, had title thereto vested in the board of education, and done and performed all the other stipulations of his contract, to the satisfaction of the said board, except the removal and re-building
Cited 0 timesPublished11 Ohio Cir. Dec. 552 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jul 1, 1901
Subdivision 6 of Sec. 3988 is as follows: “None but the lowest responsible bid shall be accepted; but the board may, in its discretion, reject all the bids, or accept any bid for both labor and material, which is the lowest … Under this provision, although some items in a bid for the entire improvement may be higher than the same items in another bid, still if the bid is the lowest in the aggregate the board may, in its discretion, accept it.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNeubauer v. Board of Education
6 Ohio N.P. 530 · Licking County Court of Common Pleas · Jan 15, 1898
The ease of Louis Neubauer v. … It does not profess to be a contract on the part of the board. A general demurrer is filed to the petition. It is objected that this is not a contract with the board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKesselring v. Board of Elections
68 Misc. 2d 28 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1971
Cited 0 timesPublished56 Misc. 2d 216 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1968
In so doing the court, relying upon the Court of Appeals’ holding in Matter of Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. v. … Allen, supra, Matter of Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 4 v. Allen and Rosen, supra).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMarquesano v. Board of Education
19 Misc. 2d 136 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1959
Petitioner seeks to compel the Board of Education to provide him with the addresses of his two children who are in the custody of their mother so as to enable him to enforce his visitation rights. … To grant relief here would place an egregious burden upon the board which has no central alphabetical index and which supervises over 800 schools in the city.
Cited 0 timesPublished25 Misc. 2d 5 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1960
Cited 0 timesPublishedCemetery Board v. Evergreens Cemetery
33 Misc. 2d 60 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1962
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna