Case law

Leichthammer v. Board of Adjustment

43 Pa. D. & C. 391 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Dec 15, 1941

Evelyn Leichthammer, as joint owners of 311-13 Haws Avenue, situate on the *392 southwest corner of Airy Street and Haws Avenue, Borough of Norristown, Montgomery County, Pa., filed this appeal from the decision of the board … In the exercise of this power the board may, among other variances, modifications and interpretations, authorize a permit to be issued.” “Sec. 9.

Gould v. Board of Regents

14 Ct. Cl. 304 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Dec 7, 1982

Rosenberg v. Board of Estimate

170 Misc. 359 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 19, 1938

The petitioner seeks an order directing the board of estimate, the New York city employees’ retirement *360 system and the medical board of the retirement system to vacate and annul a determination arrived at by the medical … The case of Matter of Moore v. Craig ( 205 App. Div. 897 ), decided under that section, is in point with the case at bar.

Eber v. Board of Elections

80 Misc. 2d 334 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1974

The Supreme Court in the case of McDonald v. Board of Election ( 394 U. S. 802 ), held that the State has the right to proscribe methods for absentee voters. … The Supreme Court in the case of McDonald v. Board of Election (supra) has indicated that the -State Legislature should be allowed to reform their election statutes at one step at a time.

Kuman v. Board of Regents

13 Ct. Cl. 384 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Mar 12, 1981

Johann v. Board of Education

26 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 209 · Wood Circuit Court · May 6, 1915

Our attention is called by counsel to two- cases in the 72d volume of Ohio State Reports, the first being Scott et al v. McCullough et al, on page 538, and the other being Fulks et al v. … The defendant insists that a certain prior action brought by State of Ohio, ex rel David Harris et al, v.

Board of Trustees v. Jones

1 Ohio Cir. Dec. 600 · Champaign Circuit Court · Oct 15, 1887

Miller v. Webber, et al., ante 77.

Board of Education v. Coulter

10 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 123 · Licking County Court of Common Pleas · Jan 15, 1910

“The Board of Education, Newark, Ohio, will please pay the above balance, $1,394.64, and charge to my account when said roof has been accepted by architect and board. “Very respectfully, “(Signed) Hugh B. … against the board.

Kinsinger v. Board of Education

22 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 241 · Logan County Court of Common Pleas · Oct 13, 1919

Lehman v. McBride, 15 O. S., page 573. … The Supreme Court pronounced the same rule in the- case of State ex rel v. O’Brien, 96 O. S., 166.

Tilney v. Board of Education

23 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 465 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Jul 12, 1921

of the contract, and that the board of education is deliberately wasting the public funds entrusted to its control. … See Emmitt v. Brophy, 42 Ohio St., 82 , and cases cited therein. For these reasons we believe that the petition states a good cause of action, and the demurrer is therefore overruled.

McGreevy v. Board of Education

20 Ohio C.C. 114 · Lucas Circuit Court · Jan 15, 1900

In Lancaster v. … Another case is a decision of the supreme court in Buchanan Bridge Co. v.

Board of Education v. Shaul

4 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 433 · Champaign County Court of Common Pleas · Oct 8, 1906

State, ex rel, v. The Board of Education of Cuyahoga Falls. … Haff v. Fulber, 45th O. S., 495; Lewis et al v. Laylin et al, 46th O. S., 663, being in point. In Haff v.

Eckstein v. Board of Education

4 Ohio Cir. Dec. 149 · Huron Circuit Court · Apr 15, 1894

, or the clerk of the board of education of such special or village district; and when any such lines have been so changed, they shall not be altered by any board or boards of education until after the expiration of three … To the extent that it is sought to charge upon the property of these plaintiffs, thus represented by them, anything for taxes for the payment of v interest and principal upon these bonds, the injunction should be granted,

Mulcahy v. Board of Education

25 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 355 · Summit County Court of Common Pleas · Feb 2, 1925

The cases of State v. Toledo, 14 C. C., 15, and Polhamus v. Board of Education, 21 C. C. 25, are not in point in this case, as •was stated by Judge Henry in the McKenzie ease. In the case of Gilbert v. Board, 21 C. … In People v.

Board of Education v. Cosgrove

5 Ohio Cir. Dec. 343 · Cuyahoga Circuit Court · Jan 15, 1896

board. . … I might say, in one sense, the board belongs to both these classes. If there was a judgment against Moser, the board must pay it.

Hayes v. Board of Ed.

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 219 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jun 10, 1901

This case is here on a petition in error to reverse a judgment obtained by the board of education of the city of Cleveland against W. J. Hayes & Sons for certain interest on bonds. On November 9,1889, W. J. … Hayes & Sons inquired of the board of education of the city of Cleveland for information touching a proposed sale of bonds by said board.

Minor v. Board of Control

11 Ohio Cir. Dec. 16 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1899

of the street which the petition asked tó be improved, or of that part of said street which was ordered by the board to be improved. … If so, the board was authorized to act. If not, it had no such right.

McGregor v. Board of Education

13 Daly 195 · New York Court of Common Pleas · May 15, 1885

Battaglia v. Teachers' Retirement Board

50 Misc. 2d 655 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1966

From September 1, 1946 to January 31,1947 petitioner was employed as a teacher by the Board of Education of Harrison, New York, and in that capacity joined the .New York State Teachers’ Retirement System. … Paragraph 3 was enacted to liberalize allowance, and specifically to abrogate the effect of the decision in Matter of Dryer v. Teachers’ Retirement Bd. (N. Y. L.

Lesser v. Board of Education

35 Misc. 2d 896 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1962

As here pertinent article XVII of the by-laws of the Board of Higher Education of the City of New York states at page 17.1 as follows: “ The Board shall furnish the benefits of collegiate education without charge for tuition … Arbury, 4 N Y 2d 238; Matter of Diocese of Rochester v. Planning Bd., 1 N Y 2d 508, 526).