Case law

Tilney v. Board of Education

23 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 465 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Jul 12, 1921

of the contract, and that the board of education is deliberately wasting the public funds entrusted to its control. … See Emmitt v. Brophy, 42 Ohio St., 82 , and cases cited therein. For these reasons we believe that the petition states a good cause of action, and the demurrer is therefore overruled.

McGreevy v. Board of Education

20 Ohio C.C. 114 · Lucas Circuit Court · Jan 15, 1900

In Lancaster v. … Another case is a decision of the supreme court in Buchanan Bridge Co. v.

Board of Education v. Shaul

4 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 433 · Champaign County Court of Common Pleas · Oct 8, 1906

State, ex rel, v. The Board of Education of Cuyahoga Falls. … Haff v. Fulber, 45th O. S., 495; Lewis et al v. Laylin et al, 46th O. S., 663, being in point. In Haff v.

Eckstein v. Board of Education

4 Ohio Cir. Dec. 149 · Huron Circuit Court · Apr 15, 1894

, or the clerk of the board of education of such special or village district; and when any such lines have been so changed, they shall not be altered by any board or boards of education until after the expiration of three … To the extent that it is sought to charge upon the property of these plaintiffs, thus represented by them, anything for taxes for the payment of v interest and principal upon these bonds, the injunction should be granted,

Mulcahy v. Board of Education

25 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 355 · Summit County Court of Common Pleas · Feb 2, 1925

The cases of State v. Toledo, 14 C. C., 15, and Polhamus v. Board of Education, 21 C. C. 25, are not in point in this case, as •was stated by Judge Henry in the McKenzie ease. In the case of Gilbert v. Board, 21 C. … In People v.

Board of Education v. Cosgrove

5 Ohio Cir. Dec. 343 · Cuyahoga Circuit Court · Jan 15, 1896

board. . … I might say, in one sense, the board belongs to both these classes. If there was a judgment against Moser, the board must pay it.

Hayes v. Board of Ed.

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 219 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jun 10, 1901

This case is here on a petition in error to reverse a judgment obtained by the board of education of the city of Cleveland against W. J. Hayes & Sons for certain interest on bonds. On November 9,1889, W. J. … Hayes & Sons inquired of the board of education of the city of Cleveland for information touching a proposed sale of bonds by said board.

Minor v. Board of Control

11 Ohio Cir. Dec. 16 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1899

of the street which the petition asked tó be improved, or of that part of said street which was ordered by the board to be improved. … If so, the board was authorized to act. If not, it had no such right.

McGregor v. Board of Education

13 Daly 195 · New York Court of Common Pleas · May 15, 1885

Battaglia v. Teachers' Retirement Board

50 Misc. 2d 655 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1966

From September 1, 1946 to January 31,1947 petitioner was employed as a teacher by the Board of Education of Harrison, New York, and in that capacity joined the .New York State Teachers’ Retirement System. … Paragraph 3 was enacted to liberalize allowance, and specifically to abrogate the effect of the decision in Matter of Dryer v. Teachers’ Retirement Bd. (N. Y. L.

Lesser v. Board of Education

35 Misc. 2d 896 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1962

As here pertinent article XVII of the by-laws of the Board of Higher Education of the City of New York states at page 17.1 as follows: “ The Board shall furnish the benefits of collegiate education without charge for tuition … Arbury, 4 N Y 2d 238; Matter of Diocese of Rochester v. Planning Bd., 1 N Y 2d 508, 526).

Board of Education v. Gorga

13 Misc. 2d 5 · New York County Courts · Sep 9, 1958

Carlisle v. Board of Supervisors

84 Misc. 511 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1914

It is sought to compel the board of supervisors of Onondaga county, pursuant to section 172 of the Highway Law, to cause the sum of $900 to be raised by certain towns of Onondaga county for the maintenance and repair of county … In any event the duty of the board of supervisors was, under section 172, merely ministerial. Having received the statement, it should have proceeded as directed. The writ prayed for may issue. Ordered accordingly.

Wissel v. Board of Health

32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 228 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1881

Donn v. Board of Supervisors

38 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 537 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1884

Crowninshield v. Board of Supervisors

26 N.Y. St. Rep. 985 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1889

Judgment ordered on the submission in favor of the plaintiff, in accordance frith the decision of this court in the case of Wood v. Supervisors of Monroe County et al., 50 Hun, 1 ; 18 N. Y. … State Rep., 671, with costs against the board of Supervisors. Judgment to be settled by Dwight, J.

Tabor v. Board of Supervisors

39 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 422 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1884

Board of Education v. King

42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 667 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1885

Birdsall v. Board of Supervisors

42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 668 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1885

Board of Health v. Cease

60 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 638 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1889