Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.23s
15 Ct. Cl. 236 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 30, 1985
Cited 0 timesPublished15 Ct. Cl. 181 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Oct 23, 1984
Crowder, was employed by the Board of Regents in June of 1978 for the fiscal year 1978-1979, and subsequently for the fiscal years 1979-1980 and 1980-1981, each beginning on July 1 and ending on the following June 30.
Cited 0 timesPublished15 Ct. Cl. 153 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Aug 1, 1984
Cited 0 timesPublished15 Ct. Cl. 71 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 17, 1984
Cited 0 timesPublished15 Ct. Cl. 72 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 17, 1984
Cited 0 timesPublished165 Misc. 2d 329 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1995
(Matter of Kelland v Board of Educ. of State of N. Y, supra, at 981.) … Board of Coop.
Cited 1 timesPublished11 Ct. Cl. 215 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Mar 21, 1977
Cited 0 timesPublished9 Ct. Cl. 18 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jul 26, 1971
Cited 0 timesPublished185 Misc. 489 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1945
On July "24, 1945, three days after his discharge from the Army of .the United States, the petitioner applied in person to the Board of Elections of the City of New York to be enrolled in the Democratic Party in order to … Hotchkiss v. Smith, 206 N. Y. 231, 242 ). To vote in a primary election, necessarily, one must enroll with a political party.
Cited 1 timesPublished19 Ct. Cl. 70 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1992
Cited 0 timesPublishedWeingarten v. Board of Education
3 Misc. 3d 418 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 12, 2004
Indeed, two of those cases predate the present statute, i.e., Schoen v Board of Educ. and De Riso v Kennedy (supra). … In Schoen v Board of Educ., the defendant Board of Education managed a school district encompassing five towns in two *424 counties.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMaurantonio v. Board of Trustees
19 Ct. Cl. 13 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1991
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcGhee v. Zoning Appeals Board
57 Va. Cir. 47 · Virginia Circuit Court · Jun 25, 2001
Brown v. Koulizakis, 229 Va. 524, 531, 331 S.E.2d 440 (1986) (motions to strike); *60 West v. Commonwealth, 16 Va. … In Board of Zoning Appeals v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCunningham v. Board of Commissioners
59 Pa. D. & C.2d 506 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County · Sep 8, 1972
These exceptions are cases involving planned residential development ordinances and subdivision and land development ordinances: Levitt & Sons, Inc., et al. v. Kane, Jr., 4 Comm. Ct. 375, 53 PS §10911-912. … Appellants, in order to test the validity of the Ridley Township Zoning Ordinance as it restricts them in the use of their property, must apply to the zoning hearing board. In Levitt & Sons, Inc., et al. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLeichthammer v. Board of Adjustment
43 Pa. D. & C. 391 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Dec 15, 1941
Evelyn Leichthammer, as joint owners of 311-13 Haws Avenue, situate on the *392 southwest corner of Airy Street and Haws Avenue, Borough of Norristown, Montgomery County, Pa., filed this appeal from the decision of the board … In the exercise of this power the board may, among other variances, modifications and interpretations, authorize a permit to be issued.” “Sec. 9.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRosenberg v. Board of Estimate
170 Misc. 359 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 19, 1938
The petitioner seeks an order directing the board of estimate, the New York city employees’ retirement *360 system and the medical board of the retirement system to vacate and annul a determination arrived at by the medical … The case of Matter of Moore v. Craig ( 205 App. Div. 897 ), decided under that section, is in point with the case at bar.
Cited 2 timesPublished26 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 209 · Wood Circuit Court · May 6, 1915
Our attention is called by counsel to two- cases in the 72d volume of Ohio State Reports, the first being Scott et al v. McCullough et al, on page 538, and the other being Fulks et al v. … The defendant insists that a certain prior action brought by State of Ohio, ex rel David Harris et al, v.
Cited 0 timesPublished1 Ohio Cir. Dec. 600 · Champaign Circuit Court · Oct 15, 1887
Miller v. Webber, et al., ante 77.
Cited 0 timesPublished10 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 123 · Licking County Court of Common Pleas · Jan 15, 1910
“The Board of Education, Newark, Ohio, will please pay the above balance, $1,394.64, and charge to my account when said roof has been accepted by architect and board. “Very respectfully, “(Signed) Hugh B. … against the board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKinsinger v. Board of Education
22 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 241 · Logan County Court of Common Pleas · Oct 13, 1919
Lehman v. McBride, 15 O. S., page 573. … The Supreme Court pronounced the same rule in the- case of State ex rel v. O’Brien, 96 O. S., 166.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna