Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.76s
19 Ct. Cl. 45 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 17, 1992
Cited 0 timesPublished11 Ct. Cl. 275 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jun 30, 1977
to tenure provided as follows: “A person who has taught on the college or university level three or more years before being employed for teaching service in a college or university under the control of the West Virginia Board … De Boer” Policy Bulletin 36, referred to in the letter was adopted by the Board of Regents on March 12, 1974, to become effective July 1, 1974.
Cited 0 timesPublished10 Ct. Cl. 55 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1973
DUCKER, JUDGE: Claimant, Milford Hardesty, doing business as Hillsview Floral Co., at 114 Chestnut Avenue, Kingwood, West Virginia, alleges non-payment by the West Virginia Board of Regents of rent for ten months, June 1,
Cited 0 timesPublished9 Ct. Cl. 247 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Feb 20, 1973
JONES, JUDGE: The claimants, Vernon Combs and Daisy Combs, seek damages from the respondent, Board of Regents, in the amount of $1,486.78, and the facts upon which they base their claim are set out in their petition as follows
Cited 0 timesPublishedDenering v. Board of Education
130 Misc. 759 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 27, 1927
(Barringer v. Powell, 230 N. Y. 37 ; Matter of O’Connor v. Emerson, 196 App. Div. 807 ; affd., 232 N. Y. 561 ; Matter of Levitch v. Board of Education, 243 id. 373; Matter of Miller v. Gould, 121 Misc. 270 .) … Board of Education, supra; Matter of Murphy v. Graves, supra.)
Cited 1 timesPublishedLandquest, Inc. v. Planning Board
140 Misc. 2d 513 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1988
Petitioners also argue that the rule of Matter of Van Euclid Co. v Sargent ( 97 AD2d 913 ) prevents the Planning Board from exercising jurisdiction over the petitioners. … The intent is to permit the Planning Board to review the filed subdivision whether it was filed immediately before the Planning Board came into existence or many years before.
Cited 1 timesPublishedConstruction Management Corp. v. Brown & Root, Inc.
35 Misc. 2d 223 · New York Supreme Court · May 3, 1962
Brown-Baymond-Walsh (hereinafter referred to as BEW), the defendant and third-party plaintiff, was the prime contractor. … Louis v. Graham, 174 App. Div. 503, 504 ; Ungar v. Horowitz, 20 Misc 2d 484 ).
Cited 1 timesPublishedAmherst County Board of Supervisors v. Zoning Appeals Board
70 Va. Cir. 91 · Amherst County Circuit Court · Nov 22, 2005
Cochran, 267 Va. at 766 , 594 S.E.2d at 577 ; Commonwealth v. County Utilities, 223 Va. 534, 542 , 290 S.E.2d 867, 872 (1982). See also Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York, 438 U.S. 104 , 98 S. … This is a crucial prerequisite finding in order for *93 the board of zoning appeals to grant a variance. Riles v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 246 Va. 48, 52 , 431 S.E.2d 282, 285 (1993); Ames v.
Cited 0 timesPublished20 Ct. Cl. 158 · West Virginia Court of Claims · May 3, 1995
Professor Whiting seeks an award of $1,960.52 from the respondent, Board of Trustees of the University System of West Virginia, for books which were stolen from his office in the Engineering Sciences Building, for books which
Cited 0 timesPublishedRockwell v. Board of Education
125 Misc. 136 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1925
(See, also, Moore v. Board of Education, 121 App. Div. 862; affd., 195 N. Y. 601, 614 ; Thomson v. Board of Education, 201 id. 457.) … (See, also, Loewy v. Board of Education, 59 Misc. 70 ; Moore v. Board of Education, supra.)
Cited 1 timesPublished20 Ct. Cl. 125 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Oct 24, 1994
Cited 0 timesPublishedFairfax County Board of Supervisors v. Zoning Appeals Board
69 Va. Cir. 129 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Oct 4, 2005
See Knowlton v. Browning-Ferris Industries, 220 Va. 571, 574 , 260 S.E.2d 232 (1979). The BZA further explained that incomplete and absent records do not create an exception to this rule. See Front Royal v. … Toone v. Zoning Appeals Board, 54 Va. Cir. 33 (2000) (quoting Foster v. Geller, 248 Va. 563, 566 , 449 S.E.2d 802 (1994)). The party challenging the BZA’s decision has the burden of proof on these issues.
Cited 0 timesPublishedQueensbury Ass'n v. Town Board
135 Misc. 2d 118 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1987
Matter of Cox v Town of Haverstraw ( 40 Misc 2d 531 ), relied upon by respondent, would seem to support this contention. … In the later case of Matter of Programming *124 & Sys. v New York State Urban Dev.
Cited 2 timesPublishedFarrell v. Village Board of Trustees
83 Misc. 2d 125 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1975
(People v Keating, 286 App Div 150, 153 .) "The hallmark of this privilege is that it is applicable when the public interest would be harmed if the material were to lose its cloak of confidentiality.” … (Cirale v 80 Pine St. Corp., 35 NY2d 113, 117.) As noted before, public interest will not be harmed by disclosure of the written reprimands.
Cited 10 timesPublished115 N.Y.S. 165 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1908
It is not for *166 the board of superintendents, nor the members thereof. … The case of Farmers’ Bank v. Hale, 59 N. Y. 53 , is not in point.' The conclusion I have reached involves no great misfortune.
Cited 2 timesPublished48 Ill. Ct. Cl. 177 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Aug 22, 1995
The facts herein are analogous to those in Fleischer v. State (1983), 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 799 , and Duble v. State (1967), 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 87 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedBrown v. Seay Logging & Hauling, L.L.C.
90 Va. Cir. 488 · Greensville County Circuit Court · Feb 9, 2014
Brown, was struck by a logging truck being driven by Defendant, Kevin J. Walker. At the time of the accident, the logging truck was owned by Defendant, Seay Logging & Hauling, L.L.C. … Brown, was struck by a logging truck being driven by Defendant, Kevin J. Walker. At the time of the accident, the logging truck was owned by Defendant, Seay Logging & Hauling, L.L.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAllwein v. Zoning Hearing Board
68 Pa. D. & C.2d 787 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lebanon County · May 29, 1975
variances from the terms of the zoning ordinance of the township: Ford v. … The Zoning Hearing Board is a statutory board of a political subdivision of the Commonwealth. Thus, it clearly falls within the agency definition. Appellee’s reliance on Beverly Building Corporation v.
Cited 1 timesPublished16 Ct. Cl. 139 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 6, 1987
Cited 0 timesPublished15 Ct. Cl. 236 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 30, 1985
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna