Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.77s
Zoning Appeals Board v. Fairfax County Board of Supervisors
73 Va. Cir. 157 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Mar 28, 2007
The Virginia Supreme Court has stated that “[t]he Board [of Zoning Appeals] is a creature of statute possessing only those powers expressly conferred upon it.” Lake George Corp. v. … Memorandum in Opposition to the Board’s Demurrer, at 9. In Board of Zoning Appeals v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSatin v. Board of Standards & Appeals
28 Misc. 2d 931 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1961
Francis, 1 A D 2d 236, affd. 1 N Y 2d 839 ; Siegel v. Lassiter, 6 A D 2d 879). … Church v. Walsh, 244 N. Y. 280, 287 ). it cannot be said that the board’s determination, based upon the findings set forth in Paragraph thirty-fifth of its return, had no rational support in the record.
Cited 4 timesPublished54 Misc. 2d 543 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1967
The court (p. 237), citing People v. Cady ( 143 N. … Matter of Altimari v. Meisser, 16 N Y 2d 629, 630 [1965].)
Cited 3 timesPublished45 Ill. Ct. Cl. 255 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Sep 25, 1992
App. 3d 354 , 521 N.E.2d 274 ; Monaghan v. Dipaulo Construction Co. (1986), 140 Ill. App. 3d 921, 923 , 489 N.E.2d 409 ; Vance v. Lucky Stores, Inc. (1985), 134 Ill. App. 3d 166, 168 , 480 N.E.2d 177 .) In Zonta v. … Hayes v. Bailey (1980), 80 Ill. App. 3d 1027 , 400 N.E.2d 544 ; Hresil v. Sears Roebuck & Co. (1980), 82 Ill. App. 3d 1000 , 403 N.E.2d 678 .
Cited 2 timesPublished33 Ohio Misc. 217 · Seneca County Court of Common Pleas · Apr 24, 1972
The superintendent’s recommendation, which was adopted by the board and made a part of the board minutes, was that “* * * the teachers who are working with only temporary certification not be offered a new contract until … C. 3319.11, and that the defendant board breached plaintiff’s contract by operation of law and violated plain *220 tiff’s rights established by R.
Cited 2 timesPublished2024 NY Slip Op 50275(U) · Webster Justice of the Peace Court · Mar 15, 2024
People v Brown ( 2024 NY Slip Op 50275(U) ) [*1] People v Brown 2024 NY Slip Op 50275(U) Decided on March 15, 2024 Justice Court Of The Town Of Webster, Monroe County DiSalvo, J. … People v. Senisi , 196 AD2d 376 , 610 N.Y.S.2d 542 [2d Dept.1994] )." ( People v.
Cited 1 timesUnpublished23 Ct. Cl. 121 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 25, 2000
Cited 0 timesPublishedBartle v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
10 Pa. D. & C.2d 613 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 22, 1957
Brown, P. … After a hearing before the. board, at which testimony was presented, the board decided that the zoning classification was properly changed, and the appeal was dismissed.
Cited 3 timesPublishedGluckman v. Board of Assessors
11 Misc. 2d 37 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1958
The respondent board moves to dismiss the petition on the ground that the petition is insufficient in law in that the petitioners failed to allege that they made timely complaint to the respondent board to correct such assessments … Their only quarrel is with the alleged illegal means used by the board in exercising the powers delegated to it by statute.
Cited 1 timesPublished17 Misc. 2d 1080 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1959
(Matter of Board of Eduo. v. Allen, 6 N Y 2d 871.) … Everson v. Board of Education ( 330 U.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBrown v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc.
16 Misc. 2d 692 · City of New York Municipal Court · May 1, 1959
Thus, in Campbell v. Pullman Co. ( 182 App. … Similarly, Barad v. New York R. T.
Cited 3 timesPublishedNational School of Visual Education v. Brown
189 Misc. 76 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1947
(Norell Holding Corp. v. Putter, 269 App. Div. 754 .) … (Daniels v. Southard, 36 App. Div. 540 ; Quackenbush v. Johnston, supra; Maruccoro v. Cronk, Inc., 95 Misc. 86 .)
Cited 2 timesPublished17 Ct. Cl. 130 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Aug 8, 1988
Cited 0 timesPublished16 Ct. Cl. 86 · West Virginia Court of Claims · May 23, 1986
Cited 0 timesPublishedZoning Appeals Board v. Fairfax County Board of Supervisors
72 Va. Cir. 362 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Dec 20, 2006
Commonwealth v. Jackson, 267 Va. 226, 229 , 590 S.E.2d 518 (2004) (citations omitted). The BZA is not arguing that the members of this Court have an actual conflict. … Wilson v. Commonwealth, 272 Va. 19, 28 , 630 S.E.2d 326 (2006). “In the absence of proof of actual bias, recusal is properly within the discretion of the trial judge.” Jackson at 229 (2004). See also Morris v.
Cited 0 timesPublished45 Ill. Ct. Cl. 336 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Dec 9, 1992
The third case, Edwards v. Safer Foundations, Inc. (1988), 171 Ill. App. 3d 793 , 525 N.E.2d 987 , adopts the pre-amendment case law in the first district. In light of the recent supreme court decision in DeClerck v. … This Court reaffirms its holding in Gunderson v. State (1980), 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 297 , that section 13—217 affords protection only to plaintiffs whose lawsuits are voluntarily dismissed.
Cited 2 timesPublishedPlantz v. Board of Supervisors
122 Misc. 576 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1924
Prankard v. Cooley, 147 App. Div. 145 ; Jewell v. Mohr, 136 N. Y. Supp. 273 . He further urges that the case of Olmsted v. Meahl, 219 N. … Williams v. Boynton, 147 N. Y. 426 ; People ex rel. Woods v. Flynn, 81 Misc. Rep. 279 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedFairfax County Board of Supervisors v. Zoning Appeals Board
71 Va. Cir. 170 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Jun 23, 2006
Ass’n v. Board of Sup., 270 Va. 259 , 618 S.E.2d 311 (2005). The Supreme Court of Virginia held in *172 Board of Sup. Fairfax v. … McManama v. Plunk, 250 Va. 27 , 458 S.E.2d 759 (1995). Cf. Board Sup. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished14 Ct. Cl. 463 · West Virginia Court of Claims · May 19, 1983
Cited 0 timesPublished13 Misc. 2d 646 · New York Supreme Court · May 7, 1958
Y. 646 ; Matter of Hogan v. City of Cohoes, 279 App. Div. 282 ; Matter of Short v. Board of Educ. of City of Watertown, 12 Misc 2d 441 ; Matter of Battaglia v. … Board of Educ. of City of New York, 3 Misc 2d 214 ; Weingard v. City of New York, 124 N. Y. S. 2d 198; Matter of Mathusa v. Board of Educ., 202 Misc. 1010 ; but see, contra, Matter of Copes v.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna