Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.35s
51 Misc. 2d 962 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1966
Matter of Greenfield v. Moses, 169 Misc. 389, 391 ). … Corp. v. City of New York, 201 Misc. 400 , affd. 281 App. Div. 860 ; Parsons Constr. Corp. v. City of New York, 163 Misc. 932).
Cited 8 timesPublishedBarzelay v. Board of Supervisors
47 Misc. 2d 1013 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1965
City of Buffalo, 6 N Y 2d 168; Brairton v. Gillette, 40 Misc 2d *1015 1009 , affd. 23 A D 2d 537; Neils v. … (Baldwin v. City of Buffalo, supra; Brairton v. Gillette, supra; Neils v. Yonkers, supra.)
Cited 5 timesPublished9 Ct. Cl. 213 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 3, 1973
The cases so decided and commented upon are cited in Maxey v. City of Bluefield, 151 W. Va. 302 , 151 S.E. 2d 689 , and Burcham v. City of Mullens, 139 W. Va. 399 , 83 S. E. 2d 505 .
Cited 1 timesPublished51 Misc. 2d 347 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 22, 1966
No plan has been adopted by the board. … (Baker v. Carr, 369 U. S. 186 ; Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 586 ; Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U. S. 339 ; Seaman v. Fedourich, 16 N Y 2d 94.)
Cited 2 timesPublished13 N.J. Misc. 627 · New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau · Aug 9, 1935
Cudahy Packing Co. v. *629 Parramore, 263 U. S. 418 ; Bountiful Brick Co. v. Giles, 276 U. S. 154 . This later case cites the Cudahy Packing Co. v. Parramore ease. … J., in Fitzgerald v. Clarke & Son, 2 K.
Cited 4 timesPublished18 N.J. Super. 425 · New York County Court, Essex County · Mar 12, 1952
In Torbyn v. South River Sand Co., 6 N. J. Super. 1 (App. … See Cirillo v. United Engineers & Constructors, Inc., 121 N. J. L. 511 (E. & A. 1939) and Licker v. J. G. Martin Box Co., 127 N. J. L. 136 (Sup.
Cited 4 timesPublished72 Misc. 2d 953 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1972
Petitioner cites the recent case of Board of Regents v. Roth ( 408 U. S. 564 ), in support of her position. … (See Matter of Butler v. Allen, 29 A D 2d 799; Matter of Pinto v. Wynstra, 22 A D 2d 914; Matter of McMaster v. Owens, 275 App. Div. 506 ; and Matter of High v. Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist.
Cited 8 timesPublished39 Misc. 2d 761 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1963
To acquire tenure the appointment must be valid (Matter of Ebling v. New York State Civ. Serv. Comm., 305 N. Y. 221 ; Palmer v. Board of Educ., 276 N. Y. 222 ; People ex rel. Hannan v. … Board of Health of City of Troy, 153 N. Y. 513 ; Peck v. Belknap, 130 N. Y. 394 ).
Cited 2 timesPublished99 Misc. 2d 470 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1979
It follows, therefore, that there was no statutory prohibition against the school board maintaining him as a teacher or paying him with funds appropriated for that purpose. … (Board of Educ. v Rickard 32 AD2d 135, 137, 138 ; see, also, Bailey v McDougall, 66 Misc 2d 161, 163 .) The petition is granted.
Cited 3 timesPublished125 Misc. 2d 310 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 27, 1984
Such a determination necessarily depends upon whether Lawson can demonstrate an infringement upon his constitutionally protected rights of liberty and property (see Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564 ; Wisconsin v Constan … (Sutton v East Riv. Sav. Bank, 55 NY2d 550 .)
Cited 5 timesPublished202 Misc. 1010 · New York County Courts · Mar 26, 1952
In an opinion published as recently as February 16th of this year the Special Term of the Supreme Court in King’s County held to this effect in the case of Matter of Adanuncio v. City of New York ( 200 Misc. 676 ). … The Adanuncio case and the decisions upon which it was based have, however, been clearly overruled by the Appellate Division, Third Department, in Matter of Hogan v. City of Cohoes ( 279 App. Div. 282 ).
Cited 3 timesPublished50 Misc. 2d 344 · New York Supreme Court · May 13, 1966
As to the legal proposition involved, it is clear that under the law the Board of Education has the right to establish the procedure — under General Circular No. 11, 1964-1965 — relating to pupil suspension (see Education
Cited 6 timesPublishedRestaino v. Board of Commissioners
16 N.J. Misc. 266 · New Jersey Circuit Court · Apr 22, 1938
Thus, in Rollins v. Hauman, 43 Pac. … And in Douglas v. Pension Board of the City of Sacramento, 242 Pac.
Cited 3 timesPublished35 Pa. D. & C.5th 429 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County · Jan 23, 2014
Brown. … First Seneca Bank v. Greenville Distributing Co., 367 Pa. Super. 558 , 533 A.2d 157 (1987). Insilco Corp. v. Rayburn, Supra.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Supervisors v. Bristol
58 How. Pr. 3 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1879
Cited 1 timesPublished58 Misc. 2d 223 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1968
Installation Co. v. Board of Educ., 20 Misc 2d 286 [Sup. Ct., Suffolk County, 1959].) … (Matter of Kayfield Constr. v. Morris, 15 A D 2d 373,379 [1st Dept., 1962].) It is this court’s determination that the respondent board’s action was neither arbitrary nor capricious.
Cited 3 timesPublished115 Misc. 2d 154 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 6, 1982
In a situation somewhat similar to this case (Ricca v Board of Educ., 47 NY2d 385, 394 ), the Court of Appeals permitted crediting substitute service as follows: “Alternatively, respondents suggest that petitioner’s service … Board of Educ., 58 AD2d 645 ; Matter of Murphy, 8 Ed Dept Rep 101).
Cited 1 timesPublishedTallmadge v. Board of Supervisors
21 Barb. 611 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1856
This, of course, was but a mere matter of com *616 putation, to be performed, not by the board of supervisors, but by some clerk to be employed by the board, or under its direction. … the board of supervisors.
Cited 3 timesPublished195 Misc. 651 · New York Supreme Court · May 17, 1949
The occasion of the enactment and the policy which dictated it is to be considered (Matter of Bowne v. Bowne Co., 221 N. … (Brown v. Mayor of City of N. Y., 63 N. Y. 239, 244 .)
Cited 5 timesPublishedKessel v. Board of Supervisors
90 Misc. 2d 574 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1977
One further point, the guidelines as to whether a meeting is a "formal convening” are the rules of the governing body itself, the board of supervisors (Matter of Anderson v Krup sak, 40 NY2d 397, 404-405 ). … In its Resolution No. 2, 1938, and rules thereunder, regular meetings of the board of supervisors shall be held each Monday at 11:00 a.m. after one week prior public notice.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna