Case law

Amster v. Board of Education

55 Misc. 2d 961 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1967

(Matter of Meenagh v. Dewey, 286 N. Y. 292 ). The petitioner’s plight arises out of the application to her situation of an administrative regulation adopted by the respondent in October, 1957. … with and does not exceed the authority granted by the statute, the interpretation of the regulation by the commissioner is controlling, and will not be disturbed in the absence of weighty reasons ” (Matter of Luxenberg v.

Brown v. Cleveland Trust Co.

10 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 430 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1908

Attention is called to the following cases supporting these conclusions: Chrisman v. Hay, 43 Fed. Rep., 552 (Iowa); Reed v. Jones, 133 Mass., 116 ; Commercial Bank v. Hiller, 106 Mich., 118 . … The same is true of Clark v. Fontain, 135 Mass., 464 , and 144 Mass., 287 ; these cases do not overrule the previous case of Reed v. Jones, 133 Mass., 116 . The same may be inferred as the fact in the case of Gammel v.

Board of Supervisors v. Brodhead

44 How. Pr. 411 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1873

'It is undoubtedly true-, that no action for a county charge can be maintained against a county or a board of supervisors. … , or even any unwillingness on the part of the present attorneys to take any action required of them by the board.

Sigman v. Board of Education

198 Misc. 306 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1950

(Matter of Martin v. School Bd. of Union Free Dist. No. 28, Long Beach, 275 App. Div. 1042 [2d Dept.], leave to appeal granted 276 App. Div. 763 ; Matter of Ennis v. City of Peekskill, 276 App. … .]; Matter of Gardiner v. Board of Educ. Union Free School Dist. No. 3, Town of Huntington, 276 App. Div. 977 [decided Feb. 20,1950].)

Brown v. Michael Business Machines Corp.

104 Misc. 2d 200 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1980

This is a suit for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff Sheilah Brown on May 14, 1976 as she removed some paper from her employer’s Michael Miracle Automatic paper cutter. … (See Codling v Paglia, 32 NY2d 330 .)

Brown v. Good Lumber Co.

76 Pa. D. & C. 318 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County · Dec 19, 1950

Practice 479-80, §640; O’Brien et al. v. O’Brien, 362 Pa. 66, 70 .

Brown v. Mayor of Baltimore

3 Balt. C. Rep. 248 · Baltimore City Court · Apr 9, 1913

Fitzpatrick v. Board of Education

69 Misc. 78 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1910

The board of superintendents of the schools of New York city recommended the appointment of Goldwasser to the position above referred to and the committee on elementary schools reported favor *79 ably to the board of education … In Schlivinski v. Maxwell, 80 App.

Hopkins v. Board of Education

99 Misc. 2d 216 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1979

Realty Corp. v Larkin, 11 NY2d 20 ; Conley v Town of Brookhaven Zoning Bd., 40 NY2d 309 ). … It is quite clear that the board of education of a central school district has the legal authority to close a school when the need exists (Glover v Board of Educ., 7 AD2d 319 ).

Toone v. Zoning Appeals Board

54 Va. Cir. 33 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Apr 15, 2000

Foster v. Geller, 248 Va. 563, 566 , 449 S.E.2d 802 (1994); Board of Zoning Appeals v. University Square Assoc., 246 Va. 290, 295 , 435 S.E.2d 385 (1993); Masterson v. … Catron v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. *38 Co., 255 Va. 31, 38 , 496 S.E.2d 436 (1998); Caprio v. Commonwealth, 254 Va. 507, 511 , 493 S.E.2d 371 (1997); Brown v. Lukhard, 229 Va. 316, 321 , 330 S.E.2d 84 (1985). Va.

Storegard v. Board of Elections

22 Ohio Misc. 5 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · Oct 23, 1969

Sharpe, v. … Ohio Power Co. v. Davidson, supra, and State, ex rel. Kahle, v. Ruppert, supra.

Horan v. Board of Appeals

6 Misc. 2d 571 · New York Supreme Court · May 10, 1957

Respondent board cross-moves to dismiss the petition for legal insufficiency. … Lashins Inc. v. Griffin, 132 N. Y. S. 2d 896; Bayport Civic Assn. v. Koehler, 138 N. Y. S. 2d 524.)

Board of Supervisors v. Betts

6 N.Y.S. 934 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1889

“I generally got my directions to post from some one of the board of assessors, generally from the chairman of the board. … Pr. 334 ; Tifft v. City of Buffalo, 82 N. Y. 204 ; Lennon v. Mayor, etc., 55 N. Y. 361 . 4.

Sulli v. Board of Supervisors

24 Misc. 2d 310 · New York Supreme Court · May 6, 1960

(People v. Kupprat, 6 N Y 2d 88; Farrington v. Pinckney, 1 N Y 2d 74, 82; Mertz v. Mertz, 271 N. Y. 466, 472 ; Melodies v. La Pierre, 4 A D 2d 982.) … Sherwood v. Board of Canvassers, 129 N. Y. 360, 366 .)

Dworken v. Board of Education

57 Ohio Law. Abs. 449 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · Jun 13, 1950

Thus, in the case of Fawick Airflex Company, Incorporated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. … The plaintiff here contends that the Board’s regulation is in the nature of a Bill of Attainder. He cites in favor of his contention the case of Cummings v. the State of Missouri, 4 Wallace (U. S.), 277.

Moses v. Board of Education

127 Misc. 477 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1926

In Teece v. Board of Education (27 State Dept. … (Clark v. State of New York, 142 N. Y. 101 ; Kehn v. State of New York , 93 id. 291; O’Connor v. City of New York, 178 App. Div. 550 ; Moore v. Board of Education , 121 id. 862; Loewy v.

Gordon v. Board of Education

52 Misc. 2d 175 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1966

Board of Higher Educ., 5 N Y 2d 430, 443). … In Nilsson v. State Personnel Bd. ( 36 Cal.

Judd v. Board of Education

164 Misc. 889 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1937

Is the board of education considered a municipal corporation such as would give this court jurisdiction over it in an action of this kind? Second. … As to the first question, I think there can be no doubt that the board of education is a municipal corporation and the weight of authority so holds. Therefore, the court has jurisdiction of this cause.

Scales v. Board of Education

41 Misc. 2d 391 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1963

Buffalo & Fort Erie Public Bridge Auth. v. Davis, 277 N. Y. 292 ). … The instant situation is to be contrasted with that in Judd v. Board of Educ. ( 278 N. Y. 200 , supra) where free transportation to school was provided for parochial school pupils, and that in Smith v.

Brown v. AMF Inc.

124 Misc. 2d 964 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1983

As long as the information is reasonably calculated to lead to evidence which is admissible, it is disclosable (see Wilson v McCarthy, 57 AD2d 617 ; Johnson v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 49 AD2d 234 ). … (See Bertocci v Fiat Motors, 76 AD2d 779 ; Johantgen v Hobart Mfg. Co., 64 AD2d 858 ; Carnibucci v Marlin Firearms Co., 51 AD2d 1067 .)