Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

0.49s

  • Ernst v. Brown Hoisting & Conveying Co.

    4 Misc. 450 · Superior Court of Buffalo · Jul 15, 1893

    Brown, John Trotter and De Wilton Skinner. … The substance of the evidence as to the soundness of this particular structure is as follows: Brown says : “ These same caps had been used in two previous places before shipping here, part of it in Ashtabula harbor and part

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jackson ex dem. Gillet v. Brown

    15 Johns. 264 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1818

    Since the case of Jackson v. Sharp, (14 Johns.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Chautauqua County National Bank

    28 N.Y.S. 1126 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1894

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Syracuse & Utica Rail-Road

    5 Hill & Den. 554 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1843

    The Chibe Justice said the action was properly commenced. v Motion denied,

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Brust v. Brown

    46 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 656 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1886

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. First Methodist Protestant Church

    38 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 637 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1884

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Franck v. Board of Education

    33 Misc. 2d 1075 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1960

    Brown, J. Petitioner in this article 78 (Civ. Prac. … Justice Hart in the Matter of Groad v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Toole v. Board of Supervisors

    16 Misc. 653 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1895

    Bank v. Carpenter, 119 N. … Bertles v. Nunan, 92 N. Y. 152 ; Zorntlein v. Bram, 100 id. 12; Hiles v. Fisher, 144 id. 306, From this fact it is argued that the wife had an assessable interest in said land,' which is probably correct.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Village of St. Bernard

    13 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 216 · Hamilton Circuit Court · Jun 18, 1910

    In the case of Clark v. Fry, 8 O. … The report of the committee of the state board of health tended to prove the 'charge made in the affidavit and the exclusion therefore was not prejudicial to the defendant.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Akron & Chicago Junction Ry.

    25 Ohio C.C. Dec. 35 · Medina Circuit Court · May 15, 1907

    The contention between the parties, together with a map of the proposed changes, will be found fully set forth in the opinion of Judge Washburn, Brown v. Railway, 17 Dec. 418 (7 N. … Ry. v. Elyria, 69 Ohio St. 414 [69 N. E. Rep. 738], leaving the only possible construction a steel structure, either on a skew, or with extra long span if the abutments are squared.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Scottish Union & National Insurance v. Brown

    14 Ohio C.C. Dec. 52 · Ashtabula Circuit Court · Apr 15, 1902

    At the time of the sale of the stock of goods from Wagstaff to Brown, Wagstaff, in behalf of himself and Brown, took the policy to the agent of the company, Mr. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Brown v. Travis

    96 Misc. 574 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1916

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pinsker v. Williams, Brown & Earle, Inc.

    4 Pa. D. & C.2d 779 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 19, 1955

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ernst v. Brown Hoisting & Conveying Co.

    54 N.Y. St. Rep. 260 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jul 14, 1893

    Brown, John Trotter and De Wilton Skinner. … The substance of the evidence as to the soundness of this particular structure is as follows: Brown says: “ These same caps had been used in two previous places before shipping here; part of it in Ashtabula harbor and part

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jackson ex dem. Prior v. Brown

    1 Cai. Cas. 484 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1803

    See Jackson v. Mann, ante, 123

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Brush v. Brown

    42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 324 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1885

    (Wilcox v. Wilcox, 14 N. Y., 576 .) This question includes the home of the ladies from which the boy goes. That is clearly seen from the case. It includes also the home of the father.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Fred J. Hovey, Inc.

    31 Misc. 2d 274 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1953

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Division of Highways

    28 Ct. Cl. 204 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 18, 2011

    Adkins v. Sims, 130 W.Va. 645 ; 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). … Pritt v. Dep’t of Highways, 16 Ct. Cl. 8 (1985); Chapman v. Dep’t of Highways, 16 Ct. Cl. 103 (1986).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Walker v. Board of Assessors

    118 Misc. 2d 467 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1983

    The court is well aware of the decision in Board of Educ. v Town of Islip ( 15 AD2d 789 ) which indicated that the plaintiff school district did not have the legal capacity to sue, since it was not a party aggrieved by the … Indeed, at Special Term in the Newsday, Inc. v Town of Huntington case ( 103 Misc 2d 406 ) the court necessarily had to find the school board had the right to take the adverse action referred to when it said (p 415), “It

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Rizika v. Board of Assessors

    62 Misc. 2d 774 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1970

    (Matter of Pennington v. Board of Assessors, 34 Misc 2d 336 ; Matter of Greystone Holding Corp. v. Lennox, 197 Misc. 463 , affd. 279 App. Div. 595 ; Matter of Shanty Hollow Corp. v. … The facts are as follows: On August 22, 1968, a copy of a notice of petition with a return date was mailed to the Board of Assessors and the Town Clerk.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.