Case law

Wood v. Board of Supervisors

2 N.Y.S. 369 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1888

People v. Board, 11 Hun, 306 ; People v. Williams ,3 Thomp. & C. 338. The legislative action, as found in the laws of each year during the period in question, may be referred to in support of this proposition. … The precise *373 ■ question has been decided adversely to the views of the plaintiff in the case of Bank v. Board, 106 N. Y. 488 , 13 N. E. Rep. 439.

Pollution Control Board v. State

30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 574 · Court of Claims of Illinois · May 13, 1975

Pollution Control Board v. State

30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 575 · Court of Claims of Illinois · May 13, 1975

Brown v. Root Manufacturing Co.

27 N.Y.S. 551 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1894

proceedings subsequent to the joinder of issue in the action were vacated by the .order vacating the judgment, and granting a new trial, pursuant to section 1525 of the Code, and cited, as authority therefor, the case of Wing v. … Following literally the language of the opinion in the case of Wing v.

Bryant v. Board of Education

4 Misc. 3d 423 · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 2004

Bearing in mind that the statute should be construed broadly to effectuate its remedial purpose (see, e.g., Matter of Scanlan v Buffalo Pub. School Sys., 90 NY2d 662, 676 [1997]; Matter of New York Pub. … such board or district makes for such health insurance coverage below the level of such benefits or contributions made on behalf of such retirees and their dependents by such district or board unless a corresponding diminution

Brown v. Salisbury Township

23 Pa. D. & C.3d 708 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County · Nov 4, 1982

In Champaine v. Zoning Hearing Board of East Bradford Township, 30 Pa. … In Bennett v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 396 Pa. 57 , 151 A. 2d 439 (1959), 118 out of the estimated 5,000 local service stations rented car trailers.

Brown v. German American Insurance

6 N.Y.S. 949 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1889

Hitchcock v. Insurance Co., 26 N. Y. 68 . The judgment should therefore be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Sokolove v. Board of Education

176 Misc. 1016 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1941

That such an evasion will not be countenanced by law is aptly stated by the Court of Appeals in Matter of Sloat v. Board of Examiners ( 274 N. … The case of Matter of Frankle v. Board of Education ( 285 N. Y. 541 ) very closely approximates the one at bar, except that the first affirmative defense here was not interposed there.

Brown v. Actors' Fund of America

103 Misc. 578 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1918

Adams v. Fitzpatrick, 125 N. Y. 124 ; Mendelson v. Bronner, 124 App., Div. 396. … People’s Bank v. St. Anthony’s R. C. Church, 109 N. Y. 512 ; Karsch v. Pottier & Stymus Mfg. & I. Co., 82 App. Div. 230 ; Westchester Mortgage Co. v. McIntire, Inc., 174 id. 446; Columbia Bank v.

Nitzberg v. Board of Education

200 Misc. 748 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1951

Application, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, for an order requiring the respondent, the board of education of the city of New York, to register petitioner’s son under his true name. … Smith v. United States Casualty Co., 197 N. Y. 420 .

Jackson ex dem. Brown v. M'Vey

15 Johns. 234 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1818

The lessors of the plaintiff claimed the premises in question as heirs at law of William Brown, deceased, who was the son of John Brown, and the question submitted to the jury was, whether the ownership set up by John Brown … In Jackson v. Shearman, (6 Johns.

Penny v. Board of Supervisors

53 Pa. D. & C.2d 329 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County · Sep 3, 1971

Articles IX and X are concerned generally with appeals only in zoning matters, to the board and to the court respectively; section 911 extends the board’s jurisdiction, at least to a limited degree, to proceedings challenging … As noted by the Commonwealth Court in Morelli v. Borough of St. Marys, 1 Comm.

Curran v. Board of Estimate

173 Misc. 1022 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1939

People ex rel. Brown v. Hoesen

62 How. Pr. 76 · New York County Court, Cortland County · Sep 15, 1881

Brown; the relator, I issued a writ of habeas corpus directing the sheriff of Cortland county tp produce before me this day the body of the relator, with the cause of his imprisonment.

Brown v. Sheriff of Perry County

38 Pa. D. & C.4th 214 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Perry County · Jul 11, 1997

Brown, styled “action in mandamus,” wherein Mr. Brown requests judicial review of the decision of the sheriff to deny a protection permit. … Brown in this matter to reverse the action of the Perry County Sheriff is appropriate, assuming that Mr. Brown meets all other criteria as set forth in the Act.

Graham v. Board of Supervisors

49 Misc. 2d 459 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1966

Brown ( 186 Misc. 553 [Sup. … Lanigan, 48 Misc 2d 434 ), in Onondaga County (Barzelay v. Board of Supervisors, Sup. Ct. Nov. 26, 1965, Lynch, J.), in Sullivan County (Shilbury v.

Allen v. Board of Assessors

45 Misc. 2d 35 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1965

In addition to opposing the motion the board cross-moves for an order directing service of the particulars demanded. … Broadway Corp. v. Lennox, 216 N. Y. S. 2d 527). The petitioners here seem to be claiming just such a disproportionate valuation as had been held to exclude disclosure altogether (Matter of 614 So. Broadway Corp. v.

Grace v. Board of Education

32 Misc. 2d 983 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1962

(Matter of O’Connor v. Emerson, 196 App. Div. 807 , affd. 232 N. Y. 561 ; Matter of Bomar v. Cole, 177 Misc. 740 .) … Subdivision 1 of section 2573 of the Education Law authorizes the Board of Education to appoint teachers for a probationary period of not less than one nor more than three years, except that where the appointee has served

Leeds v. Board of Education

19 Misc. 2d 860 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1959

(Matter of McCarthy v. Board of Educ., 106 Mise. 193.) … See Matter of Craig v. Board of Educ. ( 173 Misc. 969 , affd. 262 App.

Yamato Trading Co. v. Brown

63 How. Pr. 283 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1882

In the affidavit, it is stated that the plaintiff intends to show by Brown, on his examination, that he was insolvent at the time when he obtained the silk, and in that manner to render it evident that his representations … , at the time when he purchased the goods; that the examination of Brown as to such facts and to show his insolvency was ' actually necessary for the benefit of the plaintiff on the trial of this action; and it was further