Case law

Wolf v. Board of Education

184 Misc. 890 · New York Supreme Court · May 3, 1945

The petitioner cites Matter of Kelly v. Board of Education ( 234 App. Div. 239 , affd. 259 N. Y. 518 ), Matter of Skinkle v. Murray ( 221 App. Div. 301 ) and Matter of Wade (40 N. Y. St. Dept. Rep. 44, 46). … The case of Matter of Mitchell v. Board of Education of City of New Rochelle ( 252 App.

Klein v. Conciliation & Appeals Board

64 Misc. 2d 329 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1970

In this CPLR article 78 proceeding three tenant petitioners seek review of three opinions of respondent Conciliation and Appeals Board (CAB) concerning the right of their respective landlords unilaterally to extend two-year … The fact that HDA has approved the code and taken no action with respect to the CAB opinions with which it disagrees is immaterial (Berfond v. Hoffman, 61 Misc 2d 330 ; Hammond v. Cohen Bros. Realty & Constr. Corp., N.

Boy Blue, Inc. v. Brown

74 Va. Cir. 4 · Essex County Circuit Court · Feb 13, 2007

West Alexandria Properties, Inc. v. First Va. Mtg. & Real Estate Inv. Trust, 221 Va. 134 , 267 S.E.2d 149 (1980); Board of Supvrs. v. Southland Corp., 224 Va. 514 , 297 S.E.2d 718 (1982). … Brown and Hawkins as Principal and Agent Defendants cite Fox v.

Lewis v. Board of Education

157 Misc. 520 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1935

Thus in Gunnison v. Board of Education ( 176 N. … (Board of Education v. Minor, 23 Ohio St. 211 ; State ex rel. Weiss v. District Board, 76 Wis. 177 ; 44 N. W. 967 ; People ex rel. Ring v. Board of Education, 245 111. 334; 92 N. E. 251 ; Herold v.

Mulgrew v. Board of Education

31 Misc. 3d 296 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 10, 2011

(See Matter of Anonymous v Board of Educ. for Mexico Cent. School Dist., 162 Misc 2d 300 [Sup Ct, Oswego County 1994]; Matter of Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 67 NY2d 562 [1986].) … (Ma tter of LaRocca v Board of Educ. of Jericho Union Free School Dist., 220 AD2d 424, 427 [2d Dept 1995] [citation omitted]; see also Matter of Washington Post Co. v New York State Ins.

Holm v. Board of Education

141 Misc. 194 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 24, 1931

Y. 561 ) and Matter of Levitch v. Board of Education ( 216 App. Div. 391 ; revd., 243 N. Y. 373 ). In the first mentioned case the petitioner had taken no appeal to the Commissioner of Education. … (Matter of Burr v. Voorhis, 229 N. Y. 382 .)

Chmela v. Board of Education

26 Misc. 2d 10 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 13, 1960

It is not. unlike the situation in Maurer v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. ( 294 N. … (May v. Board of Educ., 269 App. Div. 959 , affd. 295 N. Y. 948 ; Sanchick v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 11 Misc 2d 876 ; Ginsberg v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 272 App. Div. 774 ; Wilber v.

Hardecker v. Board of Education

180 Misc. 1008 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1943

The plainly expressed intention is that in a “ special case ” the Board of Education, with the approval of the Board of Estimate, may authorize the employment of private architects. … In fact, much weight should be given to their interpretation and where, as here, the Board of Education and the Board of Estimate have determined that the situation is one which presents a “ special case ”, the court is constrained

Ewen v. Board of Education

67 Misc. 2d 555 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1971

In the absence of contractual provisions to the contrary, the grant or denial of sabbatical leaves is a fiscal and policy matter within the discretion of the Board of Education. (See Matter of Kabatt v. Graves, 256 App. … The final decision lay with the [Board of Education] and the argument by petitioner that such approval was merely pro forma has no merit”. (Legislative Conference of City Univ. of N. Y. v.

Murphy v. Board of Police

63 How. Pr. 396 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1882

first and second places in the finish of said walking match respectively; that the state of such odds was constantly changing, and that on each of such changes the individual *398 behind the table, in front of the black board … , erased on said board the figures showing the odds, and with a piece of chalk substituted new figures, representing the new odds; that individuals desiring to bet on the result of said walking match came up constantly to

Bernstein v. Board of Appeals

60 Misc. 2d 470 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1969

Board of Appeals, 43 Misc 2d 577 ; Matter of Oakwood Is. Yacht Club v. Board of Appeals, 32 Misc 2d 677 , supra; Matter of Pearson v. … Board of Appeals, supra; Matter of Pearson v. Shoemaker, supra).

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Brown

40 Misc. 2d 694 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1963

of the accident, without a license, with defendant Willie Brown as a passenger therein. … (O’Dowd v. American Sur. Co. of N. Y., 3 N Y 2d 347, 355.)

Nestler v. Board of Examiners

192 Misc. 663 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1948

While the Court of Appeals in Matter of Sloat v. Board of Examiners ( 274 N. … Accordingly, this court will follow the procedure outlined in Matter of Epstein v. Board of Education of City of N.

Brown v. Division of Natural Resources

24 Ct. Cl. 238 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 3, 2003

Brown, is the Assistant Superintendent at Panther State Forest in McDowell County and he is required to live in housing provided by respondent. 2.

People ex rel. Brown v. McNeill

35 Misc. 2d 53 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1962

Brown v. … Y. 163,167 ; People ex rel. *59 Saia v. Martin, 289 N. Y. 471 .) ” {People ex rel. Brown v. Johnston, supra, p. 485.)

Gordon v. Board of Appeals

131 Misc. 346 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1927

The rules of the board contemplate that an appeal should be taken within thirty days, although the time may be extended by the chairman or two members of the board. (Rule 5.) … If this is so the board of appeals was justified in affirming the action of the building inspector.

Brown v. New York & Erie Railroad

22 How. Pr. 451 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1859

The plaintiffs Brown and Davis, as trustees for the holders of the 3d, 4th and 5th mortgage bonds, and Drew as a holder of the 4th mortgage bonds, commenced this action, and obtained the appointment of a receiver for the

Miller v. Board

73 N.Y. St. Rep. 443 · New York County Court, Fulton County · Dec 15, 1895

In the case of Nichols v. … In the case of Hall v. Lauderdale, 46 N.

School Board v. Peter

9 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 232 · Stark County Probate Court · Oct 15, 1909

the best text-book -writers on the subject, that it is the duty of the court before ordering a jury to be summoned to determine four propositions, all of which this court regards as jurisdictional: First, that the school board … In this pi’oceeding testimony was admitted upon the four preliminary propositions heretofore mentioned; and upon the question of necessity, the testimony of a member of the school board shows that the ground sought to be

People v. Canal Board

1 Thomp. & Cook 309 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1873

This is an action brought to restrain the canal board from acting under chap. 740, Laws of 1872, and to restrain the defendants, Lord and Skinner, from applying to said board under said act. … The.principles involved are almost identical with those in the People v. Densmore decided at this term (ante, p. 280). By the opinion of Mr.