Case law

Connell v. Town Board

126 Misc. 2d 474 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1984

In Matter of Badura v Guelli ( 94 AD2d 972, 973 ) the court stated “Since the Town Board of Walworth failed to prepare an [Environmental Impact Statement], Special Term correctly remitted the matter for further proceedings … Council v Town of Oyster Bay ( 88 AD2d 484, 491 ), the court said “the town board’s failure to make the necessary ‘explicit’ SEQRA findings in rezoning the property was fatal.”

Stanley v. Board of Appeals

168 Misc. 797 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1938

(Meridian National Bank v. Hoyt & Bros. Co., 74 Miss. 221 ; 21 So. 12 .) … Hunzicker v. Pulliam, 168 Okla. 632 ; 37 P. [2d] 417 .)

Boetcher v. School Board

10 Va. Cir. 539 · Virginia Beach County Circuit Court · Apr 18, 1984

On this issue, an appeal to the Circuit Court cannot be taken unless the School Board grants its permission, which it did not do in this case. … Therefore, by statute, the ultimate determination of whether a grievance has been properly procedurally pursued has been reposed in the School Board.

Foret v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Services

79 Va. Cir. 76 · Chesapeake County Circuit Court · May 26, 2009

Defendant Kellogg, Brown & Roofs (“KBR”) special plea in bar was sustained as to Plaintiff Duff. … Glazebrook v. Board of Supervisors of Spotsylvania County, 266 Va. 550, 554 , 587 S.E.2d 589, 591 (2003).

Heller v. Brown

29 Conn. Supp. 365 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Dec 17, 1971

.” § 13a-144; Tuckel v. Argraves, 148 Conn. 355, 358 . Liability has been predicated for defects outside the traveled portion of the highway but within the highway bounds. Hay v. Hill, 137 Conn. 285 .

Duval v. Brown

31 Conn. Supp. 373 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Dec 6, 1974

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Darrow, 161 Conn. 169, 179 . … Hollister, 131 Conn. 34, 39 ; Skinner v. Hale, 76 Conn. 223, 227 ; Jeffery v. Fitch, 46 Conn. 601, 605 .

Brown v. Nasin

21 Conn. Supp. 16 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Feb 11, 1958

Parker, Peebles & Knox v. *18 El Saieh, 107 Conn. 545, 554 ; Finch v. Great American Ins. Co., 101 Conn. 332, 335 . … Molloy v. Prudential Ins. Co., 129 Conn. 251, 253 .

McCarthy v. Board of Education

106 Misc. 193 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1919

Peixotto v. Board of Education, 160 App. Div. 554 ; affd., 212 N. Y. 463 , and Peofle ex rel. Board of Education v. Finley, 211 id. 51. … within the jurisdiction of such body or board.

Presbyterian Board v. Nusbaum

18 Pa. D. & C. 601 · Pennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · May 5, 1933

premises before foreclosure and collected rents therefrom, there is a duty imposed upon him to use them in the preservation of the estate by paying taxes and other encumbrances prior to the mortgage: Commonwealth National Bank v.

Bowne v. Brown

30 Conn. Supp. 309 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Feb 5, 1973

Low Stamford Corporation v. Stamford, 164 Conn. 178, 182 ; Kellems v. Brown, 163 Conn. 478, 514 ; Consolidated Diesel Electric Corporation v. Stamford, 156 Conn. 33, 36 . … Obuchowski v. Dental Commission, 149 Conn. 257, 266 . The words of a statute are to be accorded their common meaning. General Statutes § 1-1; Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Premo, 153 Conn. 465, 474 .

Board of Supervisors v. Bowen

4 Lans. 24 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1871

When this board is sued, as a board, the county is sued; and when the board brings an action, it is the action of the county. In substance and legal effect, the board of supervisors is the corporation. … (Stewart v. Ahrenfeldt, 4 Denio, 189 ; Russell v. Cook, 3 Hill, 504 .) The strictness to which courts will hold parties to the settlement of actions between them is illustrated in the case of Shank v. Shoemaker ( 18 N.

Brown v. New York

22 Misc. 3d 893 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 2, 2008

Plaintiff in this negligence action, Anastasia Joliet Renee Brown, is a minor represented by her adoptive mother Myrtle Brown. … (See Van Emrik v Chemung, 220 AD2d at 953 .)

Board of Education v. Areman

80 Misc. 2d 659 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1975

(CPLR 2001; Covino v. Alside Aluminum Supply Co., 42 A D 2d 77, 80.) … (See Garber v. Central School Dist. No. 1, 251 App. Div. 214, 219 .) Neither the court nor an arbitrator can require the board to surrender that power. Accordingly, the dispute between the parties is not arbitrable.

Jones v. Town Board

35 Misc. 2d 688 · New York Supreme Court · May 3, 1962

Div. 260 ; Matter of Teeple v. McKeon, 273 App. Div. 936 ; Matter of Ahern v. Board of Supervisors, 7 A D 2d 538, affd. 6 N Y 2d 376; Matter of Macy v. Clayton, 100 N. Y. S. 2d 890, affd. 277 App. … In Matter of Teeple v.

Brinckerhoff v. Board of Education

2 Daly 443 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Jun 15, 1868

I expressed the opinion, in McMahon v. … In the notice of lien, The Board of School Officers, The Board of Education, The Mayor, Aldermen, and Commonalty of the city were alleged to be the owners of the schoolhouse, and the notice to foreclose it was served upon

Bayer v. Board of Education

58 Misc. 2d 259 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1968

Act, § 228, subd. 6 [now CPLR 311, subd. 7]), the action must be dismissed (Bayer v. … Judicial Council, 1944, p. 265; see Sandak v. Tuxedo Union School Dist. No. 3, 308 N. Y. 226, 232 ; Teresta v. City of New York, 304 N. Y. 440, 443 ).

Bank of South Carolina v. Brown

1 Dudley Rep. 62 · Chatham Superior Court, Ga. · Jul 15, 1831

In the case of Tanner v. Taylor, which was an action for goods sold and delivered, Mr. … Brown, • • ,i p i : >. <• >>: t.. b, m , a ., chain Overstreet & Co, of Ch.mle snü. í’üc- ; ■ > '■ • .:.■>< rcug ¡ejected, It is too loner and lies u> «¡my,. mim ¡he conclusion at which a v P.i. 1 m ' ; . ' ■ i . > ' ,«¡tuíe

Board of Supervisors v. Pindar

3 Lans. 8 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1870

The board of supervisors is a body of men organized for certain purposes provided by law. … I think it was not essential to allege that the bond was forfeited, to the knowledge of the board of supervisors, or that the board had been required by the comptroller to put the bond in suit.

Brown v. New York State Tax Commission

199 Misc. 349 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1950

(Woollard v. Schaffer Stores Co., 272 N. Y. 304 ; Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New York, 276 N. Y. 198 , supra; Richfield Oil Corp. v. City of Syracuse, 287 N. Y. 234 .) … (Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New York, 276 N. Y. 198 .)” The case of Woollard v. Schaffer Stores Co. ( 272 N.

Schafer v. Board of Education

58 Ohio Law. Abs. 554 · Stark County Court of Common Pleas · Aug 8, 1950

Rutherford v. Barberton, 148 Oh St, 242, 35 O. … Rutherford v. Barberton, 148 Oh St, 242, 35 O. O. 222, State ex rel. Staley v. Lakewood, 47 Oh Ap, 519, and Babbitt v. Shade, 60 Oh Ap, 100, 13 O.