Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

1.11s

  • Murray v. Water Board

    88 Misc. 625 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1915

    McNeile v. Glynn, 128 App. … Hannan v. Board of Health, 153 N. Y. 513 . There are three positions at the North Tonawanda pumping station: chief engineer, first assistant engineer and second assistant engineer.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lehrman v. Board of Examiners of the Board of Education

    22 Misc. 2d 348 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1959

    V, § 6; Matter of Sloat v. Board of Examiners, 274 N. Y. 367 ). An examination of the record of petitioner’s interview test discloses a reasonable basis for her failing rating. … Moreover, the recently decided case of Matter of Walker v. Board of Examiners ( 22 Misc 2d 345 , affd. 7 A D 2d 968, motion for leave to appeal denied 6 N Y 2d 707) is dispositive of the instant proceeding.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. J. P. Morgan & Co.

    177 Misc. 763 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1941

    (Brown v. Morgan & Co., Inc., 177 Misc. 626 .) Counsel for the respective parties submitted a proposed form of judgment. … Palmer, 256 Fed. 680, 685 ; Brown v. Morgan & Co., Inc., supra.)

    Reversed on other grounds by Brown v. J. P. Morgan & Co., 265 A.D. 631 (1943)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Springfield F. & M. Ins. v. Brown

    128 Pa. 392 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Crawford County · Oct 7, 1889

    Co. v. Davis, 98 Pa. 280 ; Amer. F. Ins. Co. v. Hazen, 110 Pa. 530 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Groat v. Town Board

    100 Misc. 2d 326 · New York Supreme Court · May 3, 1979

    (Burt v Smith, 181 NY 1, 5; Lincoln First Bank of Rochester v Siegel, 60 AD2d 270, 280 .) Accordingly, plaintiff Douglas F. Groat’s cause of action for malicious prosecution should be dismissed. … (Roher v State of New York, 279 App Div *330 1116, 1117 .) Moreover, Mrs. Groat would clearly have no cause of action for mental anguish. ( Roher, supra; Howard v Lecher, 42 NY2d 109, 112 .)

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Twenty-Third Street Railroad

    4 N.Y.S. 192 · The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · Jan 7, 1889

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Marsh v. Brown

    25 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 319 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1879

    It was held in the case of Lawrence v. Lindsay ( 68 N. … And the appellant was prohibited by the referee from answering any questions in reference to this, by way of explanation, denial or otherwise. *323 It was said in the case of Smith v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Bank of America

    34 Pa. D. & C.5th 507 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County · Nov 22, 2013

    Brown, Case No. 11365 of 2007, C.A., Lawrence County, as well as the same action and parties that were involved in magisterial district court proceedings in Lawrence County at no. CV-85-13. … Jones v. Costlo, 354 Pa. 245 , 47 A.2d 259 (1946) cited in Callery v. Municipal Authority of Blythe Twp., 432 Pa. at 310 , 243 A.2d at 387 . In Flemming v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Kings County Fire Insurance

    31 How. Pr. 508 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1865

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dexter v. Town Board

    68 Misc. 2d 293 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1971

    Petitioners seek to annul the action of the Town Board on July 12, 1971 in amending the ordinance and rezoning the property in a B-l business district. … (Rodgers v. Village of Tarrytown, 302 N. Y. 115, 124 .) In examining the facts herein in the light of these rules the following findings are apparent.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Curran

    21 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 260 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1878

    (Lawrence v. Fox, 20 N. Y., 268 ; Arnold v. Nichols, 64 N. Y., 117 , and cases there cited.) … In this lies the distinction between the case in hand and Barlow v. Myers ( 64 N. Y., 41 ), in so far as it is important to mark a difference between the cases.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reformed Protestant Dutch Church v. Brown

    29 Barb. 335 · New York Supreme Court · May 2, 1859

    (Hamilton and Deansville Plank Road Co. v. Rice, 7 Barb. 157 . Stanton, Pres’t, v. Wilson, 2 Hill, 153 . Trustees of Farmington Academy v. Allen, 14 Mass. Rep. 172 .)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Davis v. Brown

    60 Ohio Law. Abs. 183 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Apr 11, 1951

    Griffin v. Zimmerman, 67 Oh Ap 272, 36 N. … Beebe v. Cawley, 116 Oh St page 377, 156 N. E. 214 ; State ex rel. Griffin, v. Zimmerman, 67 Oh Ap 273, 36 N. E. 2d 808 . *186 In the case of State ex rel. Griffin v. Zimmerman, 67 Oh Ap on page 274, 36 N.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Brown v. Green

    5 Daly 194 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Apr 15, 1874

    Haskell v. … Brown v. Green, Comptroller, approving the decision of Judge Sutherland in The People ex rel. Kelly agst. Haws ( 12 Abb. Pr. 200 ), and the decision in The People ex rel. Haskell v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Steger v. Board of Examiners of the Board of Education

    171 Misc. 195 · New York Supreme Court · May 22, 1939

    The right to such a test to check up possible error of one examiner is not absolute, although the wisdom thereof is suggested by the Court of Appeals in Matter of Sloat v. Board of Examiners ( 274 N. Y. 367, 372 ). … the members of that board.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wisniski v. Brown & Brown Ins. Co. of PA Inc.

    51 Pa. D. & C.4th 437 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Feb 13, 2001

    See Ward v. Serfas, 387 Pa. Super. 425 , 564 A.2d 251 (1989). … Kilmore v. Erie Insurance Company, 407 Pa. Super. 245 , 595 A.2d 623 (1991) and Treski v. Kemper National Insurance Companies, 449 Pa. Super. 620 , 674 A.2d 1106 (1996).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of County Commissioners v. Board of County Commissioners

    7 Ohio Cir. Dec. 595 · Ottawa Circuit Court · Jun 15, 1897

    This court has passed upon that question in the case reported in the case of Commissioners of Fulton Co. v. … They are like a board of arbitrators, they are sent out and advised by the court and after havirg heard their opinion supplemented by the engineer who would kn ¡w better than any one of the committee who was not an engineer

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Frankson v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

    4 Misc. 3d 609 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 22, 2004

    Since there are substantial questions that arise with respect to the issue of Brown & Williamson’s successor’s liability for torts committed by its predecessor, and assuming without deciding that question in favor of Brown … Since Brown & Williamson’s primary role in the period that the plaintiff smoked was its role in the conspiracy, the $6,000,000 assessed against Brown & Williamson is reduced to $4,000,000.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Burchetta v. Town Board

    140 Misc. 2d 1050 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1988

    (Matter of Di Veronica v Arsenault, 124 AD2d 442 [3d Dept 1986]; Matter of Tehan v Scrivani, 97 AD2d 769 [2d Dept 1983].) … This Town Board, unlike the Town Boards involved in, for example, Di Veronica (supra), Tehan (supra) and Matter of Nielsen v Planning Bd. ( 110 AD2d 767 [2d Dept 1985]), complied with the procedural requirements of SEQRA

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Local School Board No. 8 v. Board of Education

    62 Misc. 2d 158 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1970

    of Community School Boards. … The board’s proposed plan provided for substantial alterations in the then existing local school board districts. A new district was created.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.