Case law

Brown v. Edinger

61 Misc. 366 · New York County Courts · Dec 15, 1908

He cites the case of People v. Hoyt, 3 Utah, 396 . … People v. Albany, 1 Wend. 55 '0.

Naylor v. Brown

32 Misc. 298 · New York County Courts · Jul 15, 1900

Kalbfleisch v. Kalbfieisch, 67 N. Y. 354 . But the defendants, the heirs of George McCrabbie, present a more troublesome proposition in this case. … In Baxter v. Baxter, 76 Hun, 98 , it was held that the decree of the surrogate was not conclusive as to the mental capacity of the testator. In Harris v. Harris, 26 N.

Brown v. Incorporated Village

4 Ohio C.C. 407 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Mar 15, 1890

In the case of State v. Newton, 26 Ohio St. 206 , the case of Fosdick v. … Hibbs v.

Brown v. Genet

63 How. Pr. 236 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Mar 15, 1882

Brown v. Phelps

55 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 219 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1888

Brown v. Brockett

55 How. Pr. 32 · New York County Court, Herkimer County · Oct 15, 1877

Rockwell v. Brown

11 Abb. Pr. 400 · The Superior Court of New York City · May 15, 1871

The plaintiff, therefore, in order to establish his right to recover, should have proven the proceeding and the assignment under the same (Best v. Strong, 2 Wend., 319 ; Salters v. … Hoag v. Hoag ( 35 N.

Horton v. Brown

36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 654 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1883

(Bradley v. Burwell, 3 Den., 262 .) … (See, also, Willcox , v. Smith, 26 Barb., 334 ; Russell v. Lane, 1 id., 523; Fort v. Gooding, 9 id., 388; Buckhout v. Hunt, 16 How. Pr., 412 .) The case of Field v. Field ( 77 N.

Brown v. Guthrie

46 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 29 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1886

(Hyslop v. Clarke, 14 Johns., 458 ; Wakemam, v. Grover, 4 Paige, 41 ; S. C., in error, 11 Wend., 187 ; *34 Sheldon v. Dodge, 4 Den., 217 .) … If the transaction had been simply a transfer to Guthrie for the •exclusive purpose of paying his own debt, the provision as to the .surplus would not have avoided it (Leitch v. Hollister, 4 N. Y., 211 ; Dunham v.

Fuller v. Brown

42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 162 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1885

Co. v. Oakley, 9 Paige, 259 ; Kellogg v. Howell, 62 Barb., 283 ; McCotter v. Jay, 30 N. Y., 80 ; Gould v. Mortimer, 26 How., 167 .) … Brown and to Benjamin O. Brown, are entitled to no consideration, except so far as they reflect on the action and the motives of the parties to the suit in the transactions for, and of the sale after, the *168 decree.

Gooding v. Brown

42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 148 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1885

.; Phillips v. Thompson, 1 Johns. Ch., 149 ; Parkhurst v. Van Cortland, 14 Johns., 15, 35 ; Wheeler v. Reynolds, 66 N. Y., 227 ; Winchell v. Winchell, 17 N. Y. Weekly Dig., 104; Levy v. Brush, 45 N. Y., 589 ; Dung v. … In Podmore v.

Scott v. Brown

31 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1881

A motion was made to revive the action against Caroline Brown, as executrix, and for leave to issue a supplementary complaint against her as such executrix. … It seems to us to be clearly covered by the case of Cregan v. The Brooklyn Cross Town Railroad Company ( 15 N.

Brown v. 44th Street Development, LLC

48 Misc. 3d 234 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 19, 2015

In motion sequence No. 001, plaintiff Donald Brown moves for summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law §§ 240 (1) and 241 (6) pursuant to CPLR 3212. Defendants oppose the motion. … The material facts in the instant matter are as follows. *236 Plaintiff Donald Brown is a carpenter who was injured while working on the construction of a building at 550 West 45th Street in Manhattan.

Brown v. Metropolitan News Co.

149 Misc. 536 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1933

(Beardsley v. Kilmer, 236 N. Y. 80 ; Bieber Bros. News Co. v. New York Evening Post, 144 Misc. 405 , and cases therein cited.) … Reliance is placed by plaintiff upon the cases of Sultan v. Star Co., Inc. ( 106 Misc. 43 ); Langley v. Furman (132 id. 726); Finnegan v. Butler (112 id. 280); Straus v. American Pub. Assn. ( 85 App.

Brown v. People

23 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 535 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1879

(People v. Thomas, 3 Hill, 169 ; People v. Williams, 4 id., 9 ; People v. Kendall, 25 Wend., 399 ; Parmelee v. People, 8 Hun, 623 ; Sherman v. People, 13 id., 575.) … (People v. Crissie, 4 Denio, 525 ; Skiff v. People, 2 Park. Crim. Rep., 139 .) The conviction should be reversed, and the proceedings remitted to the General Sessions of Onondaga county for a new trial. Talcott, P.

Koehler v. Brown

2 Daly 78 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Jun 15, 1866

It was not formed under any general or special law of the legislature, and was nothing more, therefore, than an ordinary partnership (Townsend v. Goewey, 19 Wend. 424 ; Wells v. Gates, 18 Barbour, 554).

Eakin v. Brown

1 E.D. Smith 36 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Nov 15, 1850

Thus, in Bremner v. … In the cases of Blunt v. Akin, 15 Wend. 522 , and Waggoner v.

Boardman v. Brown

51 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 336 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1887

(Stringham v. Stewart, 100 N. Y., 516 .) The evidence in this case discloses that the defendants were contractors in the excavation of a tunnel for the new aqueduct for New York.

Alexander v. Brown

16 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 641 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1877

Bolton v. … In Precious v.

Dawley v. Brown

16 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 461 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1876

(Sweet v. Tuttle, 14 N. Y., 465 ; Gardner v. Clark, 21 id., 399.) … In the former action the defendant Brown and George D.