Case law

Household Finance Corp. v. Brown

22 Fla. Supp. 2d 72 · Duval County Court · May 6, 1987

BROWN, is the head of a family, and as such his wages are not subject to garnishment. 2. … BROWN and ANITA V. BROWN, for all of which let ¿xecution issue. 3. The monies currently being held by the Clerk as a deposit for attorney’s fees shall be disbursed to Samuel L. LePrell, Attorney for Garnishee.

Brown v. Pasternak

92 Misc. 2d 347 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1977

Inasmuch as cases such as Holodook v Spencer ( 43 AD2d 129 ) and Lastowski v Norge Coin-O-Matic ( 44 AD2d 127 ) hold that no such cause of action exists, the plaintiffs argue that the requested leave to amend must be denied … the court that the counterclaim seeks an apportionment of responsibility in negligence between those parties alleged to have been responsible for the damages to the infant plaintiff as envisioned in the decision of Dole v

Brown v. Lavine

78 Misc. 2d 1085 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1974

This is an article 78 proceeding brought by the petitioner, Maria Brown, for an order to annul and reverse the determination of respondent, Commissioner of New York State Department of Social Services, which upheld the failure … (Matter of Myerson v. Schechter, 25 Misc 2d 291 .)

Brown v. Minuse

41 Misc. 2d 427 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1963

Assn. v. New York State Thruway Auth., 5 N Y 2d 420, 424.) And this court must agree with the Court of Appeals when it stated, in Matter of New York Post Corp. v. … (Connolly v. O’Malley, 17 A D 2d 609.) The petition is denied.

Brown v. Southern Illinois University

47 Ill. Ct. Cl. 336 · Court of Claims of Illinois · May 12, 1994

(Thomas v. State (1961), 24 Ill. Ct. Cl. 137 ; Munch v. State (1966), 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 313 ; Bodine v. State (1983), 35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 777 .) … (Williams v. Medical Center Commission (1975), 60 Ill. 2d 389 .)

Jackson ex dem. Antell v. Brown

3 Johns. 459 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1808

Y. v. 1. p. 542. L. N. Y. p. 285.

People v. Brown

110 Misc. 2d 1050 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1981

(People v Wheatman, 29 NY2d 337 , cert den sub nom. Marcus v New York, 409 US 1027 ; cf. People v Brown, 40 NY2d 183 .) … (People v Brown, 40 NY2d 183, 185-188 .) This statute is not a discovery device but rather is a deterrent to the abuse of the warrant process by requiring testimony under oath.

Brown v. Philmac Sportswear Co.

23 N.J. Misc. 378 · New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau · Nov 26, 1945

Brown ran over and grabbed Leila from Phil,” and by another witness as “Mrs. Brown tried to get Leila from Phil.” The affair reached such proportions that those in authority at the respondent plant summoned the police. … Emerick v. Slavonian Greek Catholic Union, 93 N. J. L. 282; 108 Atl. Rep. 223 ; Barrese *380 v. Standard Silk and Dyeing Co., 110 N. J. L. 565; 166 Atl. Rep. 179 ; King v. Camden Paving Co., 11 N. J. Mis.

People v. Brown

21 Misc. 2d 549 · New York County Courts · Mar 8, 1960

Defendant Brown was arrested on or about November 1,1952, charged with first degree assault and third degree burglary. Thereafter he was convicted, and sentenced on or about February 24,1953. … (People v. Moylan, 4 Misc 2d 747 ; People v. Lewis, 12 Misc 2d 266 ; People v. Brown, 3 A D 2d 696; People v. Pitts, 6NY2d288.) Submit order.

Howarth v. Brown

60 Misc. 2d 587 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1968

(New London Instrument Co. v. Taffet, 38 Misc 2d 276 ; Briguglio & Gaddy v. Stevenson, 27 Misc 2d 935 ; Buchanan v. Graham, 38 Misc 2d 398 .) In Briguglio & Gaddy v. … And in Buchanan v.

Brown v. Southeast Bank, N.A.

6 Fla. Supp. 2d 67 · Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · Apr 13, 1984

Brown v. Reed

10 Misc. 2d 227 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1957

Act, § 105; Boyd v. United .States Mtge. & Trust Co., 187 N. Y. 262 ; De Witt v. Abraham Bros. Horse & Mule Co., 170 App. Div. 610 ; Evoy v. Expressmen’s Aid Soc., 66 Hun 636 , opinion in 21 N. Y. ¡3. 641; Yeager v.

Myruski v. Town Board

87 Misc. 2d 1063 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1976

Fellows v Early, 106 App Div 269 ). … He may not incur debts or expenses in excess of the amount raised for highway purposes by taxation or added for such purposes by the town board (see Matter of Flike v Strobel, 252 App Div 35 ; Gardner v Town of Cameron, 155

Groland v. Brown

33 Misc. 2d 442 · New York Justice Court · Apr 11, 1962

The defendant, Pauline Brown, owns and operates a restaurant under the firm name and style of Brown’s Luncheonette, at 27 North Main Street, Spring Valley, New York, and has so operated this restaurant for nearly 30 years … One of the first cases setting forth this rule, which is still widely cited, is the case of Moore v. Gadsden ( 93 N. Y. 12 ). This ease was followed a few years later by the case of the City of Rochester v.

Brown v. Holz

5 Misc. 2d 512 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1957

The time requirements of the statute cannot be waived or modified (Campbell v. Holz, N. Y. L. J., June 21, 1955, p. 5, col. 4). … (See Matter of Levine v. Lending, 176 Misc. 462 .) The proceeding is accordingly dismissed.

People v. Brown

26 Misc. 2d 906 · New York County Courts · Dec 12, 1960

His present acknowledgment that the stolen cab was worth less than $100 brings this case within the principle set forth in People v. … (People v. Foster, supra, p. 77 .) I find that the value of the taxicab on the day it was stolen was less than $100.

Brown v. Iaconelli

26 Misc. 2d 194 · City of New York Municipal Court · Nov 4, 1960

The complaint alleges a cause of action under the common law as well as under section 16 of the Civil Rights Law as implemented by-section 65 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law (Kinney v. 1809 Forest Ave., 7 Misc 2d 1 … Although expert testimony, lacking herein, is a better criterion to establish intoxication, there is no question that lay persons may render an opinion as to whether or not a person appeared intoxicated (People v.

Brown v. Guerin

164 Misc. 562 · City of New York Municipal Court · Sep 3, 1937

In the case of Taylor v. Ellsworth Building Corp. ( 183 N. Y. Supp. 394 ; affd., 199 App. Div. 934 ) the court, in an opinion rendered by the late distinguished Mr. … (Kliger v. Rosenfeld, 130 App. Div. 421 .) The order of Mr. Justice Gallagher dated August 6, 1937, is in all respects valid and proper and the motion to vacate such order is denied.

Brown v. City of New York

57 Misc. 433 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1908

In Muller v. Mayor, 63 N. … This principle, as was said in Van Dolsen v. Board of Education, 162 N.

Presti v. Board of Examiners of the Board of Education

71 Misc. 2d 232 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1968

(See, also, Keays v. Conway, 105 N. Y. S. 2d 944.) … In Matter of Hall v. Leonard ( 260 App. Div. 591, 597 , affd. 285 N.