Case law

Brown v. Harris

25 Barb. 134 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1857

Kane v. Gott, 24 Wend. 641 . Depeyster v. Clendining, 8 Paige, 295 . Gott v. Cook, 7 id. 521.)

Johnson v. Brown

57 Barb. 118 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1870

(Vibbard v. Roderick, 51 Barb. 616 . Bedford v. Terhune, 30 N. Y. Rep. 453 .) … The true rule, I think, is that laid down by Gardner, J., in Howard v. Sexton, ( 4 N. Y. Rep. 157 .)

Smith v. Brown

17 Barb. 431 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 2, 1854

An averment that the plaintiff performed the contract as near as it ivas possible was held bad, in Stagg v. Munro, ( 8 Wend. 3 ,99.) Besides,, in this case the pleading is in the alternative..

Birckhead v. Brown

5 Sandf. 134 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jun 28, 1851

The cases in our own courts, and particularly Gardiner v. Buchbee ( 3 Cow. 120 ), Burt v. Sternbugh ( 4 Cow. 559 ), and Bouchaud v. Diaz ( 3 Denio 238 ), entirely correspond with those that have been quoted. Gardiner v. … (Miller v. Marnice, 6 Hill 122 .)

Credit v. Brown

10 Johns. 365 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1813

Everett v. Brown

120 Misc. 349 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1923

Plaintiff moves to confirm an award of a board of arbitration appointed pursuant to an agreement entered into by the parties hereto. … Phillips v. Rouss, 7 N. Y. St. Repr. 378; affd., 118 N. Y. 680 ; Fudickar v. Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co., 62 id. 392, 399; Matter of Burke, 191 id. 437, 440; Masury v. Whiton, 111 id. 679; Burchell v. Marsh, 17 How.

Allen v. Brown

5 Lans. 511 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1872

(Hilliard on Injunctions, 2d ed., 81; Edwards v. … (Childs v. Lyons, 3 Robertson’s Reps., 704.)

Brown v. Littlefield

7 Wend. 454 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1831

The notice given to the attorney for the plaintiff in this cause, to produce the assignment of the judgment from the plaintiff Brown to Ephraim Towner, was sufficient (it not having been produced) to authorise parol evidence

Brown v. Richardson

7 Rob. 57 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jan 15, 1868

Brown, or order, at different dates, on demand. C. L. Brown indorsed the notes in this action to his brother, the plaintiff. … Brown voluntarily received the $3340.14, from Woods, when there was no obligation upon him so to do.

Forker v. Brown

30 N.Y.S. 827 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Nov 5, 1894

The judgment recites that certain allegations of the complaint (those referring to the construction contract of the railroad company with Brown, Howard & Co.) were waived or withdrawn in open court; but, since the record … from the sale of which stock the defendants have derived large profit;, and, lastly, that while such directors, acting or in duty bound to act *829 as such, they caused the railroad company to enter into a contract with Brown

Brown v. Briggs

1 How. Pr. 152 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1845

Goldsmith v. Brown

35 Barb. 484 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1861

By the Court, Brown, J. … Schroeppell v. Shaw, 3 Comst. 446. Merritt v.

Pritchard v. Brown

4 N.H. 397 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Oct 15, 1828

In the case of Scoby v. … Morse v. Shattuck.

Brown v. Woodworth

5 Barb. 550 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1849

. & V. ed. 1789.). … In Monk v. Buller, (Cro. Jac. 574,) it was held that a license by a commoner must be by deed. (2 Saund. 323, 328.) Many cases will be found considered in Hawkins v. Shippam, (5 B. & C. 221;) Perry v.

Clem v. Brown

3 Ohio Misc. 167 · Paulding County Court of Common Pleas · May 14, 1965

Flandermeyer v. Cooper (1912), 85 Ohio St., 327 ; Smith v. Nicholas Bldg. Co. (1915), 93 Ohio St. 101 ; Kelly v. Bouche (1941), 21 Ohio Ops. 244 , 6 Ohio Supp. 327 . … Co. v. Jones, 21 Colo. 340 , 40 Pac. 891 .” In Sheard v. Oregon Electric Ry.

Furniss v. Brown

8 How. Pr. 59 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1853

In all of Brown’s letters he recognizes Furniss’s joint ownership. … The motion by Brown for the injunction must, of course, under the view of the case, be denied with costs. Furniss agt. Brown. DECISION. 1.

Curtis v. Brown

2 Barb. 51 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1847

In Prosser v. … In Hough v.

Brown v. Dewey

2 Barb. 28 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1847

(Robinson v. Cropsey, 6 Paige, 480 . Holmes v. Grant, 8 Id. 257.) If there is gross inadequacy of price, it is always a strong circumstance to show that the parties did not intend a sale. … With the exception of the fact that a part of the consideration was paid by surrendering securities already held by the defendant, this case is not distinguishable from that of Glover v. Payn, ( 19 Wend. 518 .)

Church v. Brown

29 Barb. 486 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1859

In the case of Brewster v. … This case of Brewster v.

Huy v. Brown

12 Wend. 591 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1834