Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

0.46s

  • Brown v. German-American Insurance

    60 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 634 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1889

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Atlantic Avenue Railroad

    7 N.Y. St. Rep. 877 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1887

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rogan v. Sear-Brown Group

    183 Misc. 2d 364 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 19, 2000

    Based upon a motion argued on June 24, 1999, this court previously granted summary judgment in favor of the Sear-Brown Group, formerly known as Sear-Brown Associates, P. … Co. v Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp., at 379, quoting Hill v Board of Supervisors, 119 NY 344, 347 ). There is other language contained in Yonkers Contr. Co. v Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Herkimer County Bank v. Brown

    6 Hill & Den. 232 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1843

    or sanction the delay, we think *234 is not enough to render the execution dormant, (a) In this view of the case it is unnecessary to consider whether the chancery execution was not cut off by the previous assignment by Brown … See Knower v. Barnard and others, ( 5 Hill, 377 ;) Kimball v. Munger, ( 2 Hill, 364 ;) Grab. Pr. 382 to 384, 2nd ed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hercoform Marketing, Inc. v. Brown

    75 Pa. D. & C.2d 394 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lebanon County · Oct 14, 1975

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ohio Power Co. v. Brown

    29 Ohio Law Rep. 10 · Hancock County Court of Common Pleas · Nov 4, 1964

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. City of Toledo

    10 Ohio C.C. 642 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Sep 15, 1895

    Brown — who was a client of the attorney of the bidders —and asked him to file this petition. … Brown went to the city solicitor, and asked that he commence an action, under section 1777, to enjoin the issue of these bonds.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. St. Bernard (Vil.)

    22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 178 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jun 18, 1910

    In the case of Clark v. Fry, 8 Ohio St. 358 [ 72 Am. … The report of the committee of the state board of health tended to prove the charge made in the affidavit and the exclusion therefore was not prejudicial to the defendant.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brooklyn Oil Refinery v. Brown

    42 How. Pr. 286 · The Superior Court of New York City · Nov 15, 1871

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • King Records, Inc. v. Brown

    44 Misc. 2d 183 · New York Supreme Court · May 28, 1964

    and selling Brown’s recordings. … Defendants Brown and Fair Deal cross-move for a stay of proceedings pending arbitration. Defendants challenge the validity and enforcibility of plaintiff’s contract with Brown.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Mutual Trust Co.

    44 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 645 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1885

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Brown v. Blake

    49 Barb. 9 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1867

    (People v. Draper, 15 N. Y. Rep. 532 . See also same v. Metropolitan Police Board, 19 id. 204; Same v. Pinckney, 32 id. 377.) … V. J. C.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    143 Misc. 2d 514 · New York Supreme Court · May 4, 1989

    The new indictment is an effective method of clarifying procedural problems (People v Benson, 208 Misc 138 ) or furnishing a Grand Jury with additional relevant information *516 (People v Heller, 122 Misc 2d 991 ). … (People v Potter, 50 AD2d 410, 411-412 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Nichols

    2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 153 · City of New York Municipal Court · Jun 15, 1885

    In Wolffle v. Schmeuzer (City Court, Special Term, March 15, 1887), it appeared that the complaint contained three counts, aggregating about $450.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown, Rives & Co. v. Wilson

    4 Va. 481 · Virginia Chancery Court · Feb 15, 1810

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    149 Misc. 2d 435 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1990

    (People v Trowbridge, 305 NY 471 [1953]; see also, People v Caserta, 19 NY2d 18, 21 [1966].) … (People v Caserta, supra, 19 NY2d, at 21 .) However, the prejudicial effect is very similar. (Cf., People v Morales, 37 NY2d 262 ; but see, People v *439 Wharton, 74 NY2d 921 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    147 Misc. 2d 1047 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1990

    (People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210 .) … People v Drain, 73 NY2d 107 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    145 Misc. 2d 724 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1989

    Defendant’s reliance on People v Appel ( 141 AD2d 374 [1st Dept 1988]) and People v White (supra) is misplaced. … (People v Taylor, 65 NY2d 1 , 5 [1985].)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • School Board v. Wilder

    74 Va. Cir. 309 · Richmond County Circuit Court · Nov 5, 2007

    City of Richmond v. Board of Supervisors of Henrico County, 199 Va. 679, 684 , 101 S.E.2d 641, 645 (1958). … Sims Wholesale Co. v. Brown-Forman Corp., 251 Va. 398, 404 , 468 S.E.2d 905, 908 (1996). This axiom stems from basic principles of separation of powers.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. J. P. Morgan & Co.

    177 Misc. 626 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1941

    (Sayer v. Wynkoop, supra, 59 .) … (Peckham v. Industrial Securities Co., 31 Del. 200 ; 113 A. 799 ; South Memphis Land Co. *637 v. McLean Hardwood Lumber Co., 179 Fed. 417, 420, 421 ; Brown v. Ehlinger, 90 Wash. 585 ; 156 P. 544 .)

    Reversed on other grounds by Brown v. J. P. Morgan & Co., 265 A.D. 631 (1943)Cited 11 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.