Case law

Brown v. Grossman

109 N.Y.S. 670 · City of New York Municipal Court · Mar 14, 1908

Jackson ex rel. Culver v. Brown

4 Cow. 550 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1825

Brown v. Department of Health

14 Ct. Cl. 159 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jun 30, 1982

Brown v. City of New York

198 Misc. 147 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1950

Act, § 1289; Matter of Levine v. Lending, 176 Misc. 462 ). The court could not extend the tolling of the statute by a provision for service outside the period of commencement prescribed by section 1286. … (See Matter of Morganstein v. Arnstein, 43 N. Y. S. 2d 243.)

Brown v. Maleh

171 Misc. 2d 730 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1997

(Wilcox v Morrow, 226 AD2d 1077 ; Martin v Seaman, 184 AD2d 996 , lv denied 80 NY2d 759 ; 8A Carmody-Wait 2d, NY Prac § 62:4, at 183; La Porte v Board of Educ., 57 AD2d 1029 ; Tripoli v Tripoli, 83 AD2d 764 [motion should … Elliott, 42 AD2d 898 ; Ferro v Maline, 31 AD2d 779 ), or unless the defendant stipulates to an increased award (Ladd v Parkhurst, 87 AD2d 971 ; Wolf v Trans World Airlines, 98 AD2d 697 ).

People v. Brown

170 Misc. 2d 266 · New York County Courts · Aug 29, 1996

The first issue the court will address is whether defendants Brown and Rochester were entitled to a jury trial. The town prosecutor argues that they were not. … Lind v New York, 506 US 1011 ).

Brown v. Ohio Oil Co.

21 Ohio C.C. 117 · Harrison Circuit Court · May 15, 1900

In this respect the lease is different from the one considered in the case of the Northwestern Ohio Natural Gas Co. v. … Gas Co. v. The City of Tiffin et al. ante, disposes of the case upon this proposition upon principle.

Brown v. Jeffrey Manufacturing Co.

15 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 45 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Mar 11, 1913

Brown v. German American Insurance

52 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 592 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1887

Brown v. German American Insurance

53 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 679 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1887

Parish v. Pratt, Brown & Garfield

30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 525 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1881

Pratt, Brown & Garfield, within ten days after service hereof, file with the clerk of Onondaga county, a consent to the substitution of Isaac I.

People ex rel. Brown v. Blake

49 Barb. 9 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1867

(People v. Draper, 15 N. Y. Rep. 532 . See also same v. Metropolitan Police Board, 19 id. 204; Same v. Pinckney, 32 id. 377.) … V. J. C.

Brown, Rives & Co. v. Wilson

4 Va. 481 · Virginia Chancery Court · Feb 15, 1810

Brown v. Executors of Cattell

1 S.C. Eq. 112 · Court of Chancery of South Carolina · Mar 15, 1785

Brown v. Posternock's Beauty Parlor

14 Pa. D. & C. 480 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 2, 1930

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Brown

40 Ohio Law. Abs. 617 · Jefferson County Court of Common Pleas · Dec 30, 1943

McGaughey, Admr., etc. v Jacoby et, 54 Oh St 487. John A. Cheney v Isaiah A. Powell et, 20 Ohio Circuit Court Reports, 398. … The United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of Baltimore, Md. v Jones et, 22 Oh Ap 345. *622 These decisions would indicate that the instant Stanley E.

Johnson, Murphy & Co. v. Brown

2 Cin. Sup. Ct. Rep. 83 · Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · Apr 15, 1871

Brown v. Ohio Oil Co.

11 Ohio Cir. Dec. 810 · Ohio Circuit Courts · May 15, 1900

In this respect the lease is different from the one considered in Northwestern Ohio Natural Gas Co. v. Tiffin, 59 Ohio St., 420 , and must receive a different construction from that put upon that lease. … Gas Co. v. Tiffin, supra, disposes of the case upon this proposition upon principle.

Findlay Brewing Co. v. Brown

19 Ohio C.C. 612 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1899

In the court of common pleas, Brown was plaintiff and the-Brewing Company defendant. … And we believe, too, that this is consistent with the case of Bogart v. Cox, 4 C.

Cleveland Trust Co. v. Brown

32 Ohio C.C. Dec. 161 · Cuyahoga Circuit Court · Dec 27, 1910

The. action was commenced to foreclose a contract lien asserted by plaintiff upon real estate of the defendant Brown. The order appealed from reads: ‘ ‘ October 27, 1910. … adjudged that said petition be, and the same is hereby dismissed, and that the defendants, John Hartness Brown and C.