Case law

Commonwealth v. Brown

23 Pa. D. & C.3d 417 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 20, 1980

Com. v. Brown, 252 Pa. Superior Ct. 365 , 381 A. 2d 961, 963 (1977). In Com. v. Mancuso, 247 Pa. … In Com. v. Lewis, 247 Pa.

Brown v. H. & E. T. Betts

13 Wend. 29 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1834

The affidavit of Brown, therefore, strictly, did not deny any material allegation in the affidavit of the applicants. … Brown, it is denied, was in the actual occupation of the premises.

Commonwealth v. Brown

4 Pa. D. & C.3d 457 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Nov 2, 1977

In Commonwealth v. … V Brown’s confession (out of court) was not the only evidence against him introduced in the Commonwealth’s case.

Commonwealth v. Brown

67 Pa. D. & C.2d 246 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County · Jan 9, 1974

J., On June 29, 1973, defendant, Robert Lee Brown, after jury trial, was convicted of burglary and armed robbery. Motions in arrest of judgment and for new trial were filed. … In Commonwealth v.

Thornton v. Brown

84 Pa. D. & C. 530 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 7, 1952

There is good authority for such contention: Ehinger v. Bahl, 208 Pa. 250 , and Leon Gabai, Inc., v. Krakovitz, 98 Pa. … In Miners Savings Bank v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

70 Pa. D. & C.2d 66 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lebanon County · Aug 21, 1975

On Twelfth Street, near where it intersects with Willow Street, Brown struck a parked, unattended car. … Brown has made a timely application to dismiss the indictment based upon the Pennsylvania Crimes Code of December 6, 1972, P.L. 1068, (No. 334), sec. 1,18 Pa. C.S.A. §110(l)(ii), and the “Campana Rule:” Commonwealth v.

Walden v. Brown

83 Pa. D. & C. 407 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 5, 1952

‘the head of any administrative board or commission.’ … Sturm v. McGrath et al., 177 F. 2d 472 (Kans. 1949).

Brown v. Woodhead

11 Pa. D. & C.4th 438 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County · Apr 11, 1991

BROWN, J., Presently before the court is respondent’s motion to dismiss an action to establish paternity filed by petitioner on November 9, 1990. … In support of this argument, respondent cites Paulussen v. Herion, 359 Pa. Super. 520 , 519 A.2d 473 (1986).

Brown v. Syostek

2 Pa. D. & C. 431 · Pennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · Jun 20, 1922

It seems to be established that section 14 of the Practice Act limits the right of counter-claim to actions of assumpsit: Jarecki v. Montgomery, 69 Pitts. L. J. 109 (1920). *432 In Shoemaker v. Myers, 30 Dist. … The Supreme Court of our State has held that unliquidated claims for tort, fraud or deceits are not proper set-offs or counter-claims: Roth v. Reiter, 213 Pa. 400 .

Suleski v. Brown

9 Pa. D. & C.2d 694 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 1, 1956

On June lly 1956, Nathan Brown came to Philadelphia for the express purpose of having his deposition taken as a witness for use at trial in the case of Haddon Carpet Co., Inc., v. Jacob H. … S. 222 ; Stewart v. Ramsay, 242 U. S. 128 ; Diamond v. Earle, 217 Mass. 499 ; Parker v. Marco, 136 N. Y. 585 .

Brown v. Division of Highways

24 Ct. Cl. 243 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 3, 2003

Brown, was traveling south toward Harman in Randolph County on Route 33 when she struck a broken stake causing damage to her tire. 2.

Brown v. Buckner

69 Pa. D. & C. 629 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Sep 16, 1949

See Korman et al. v. Trainer et al., 258 Pa. 362 ; McClenachan v. Malis, Admx., et al., 310 Pa. 99, 102 ; Tudesco et ux. v. Wilson, 163 Pa. Superior Ct. 352, 355 . Hence this suit. … See Merritz v. Circelli et ux., 361 Pa. 239, 242 . In Suraci v. Ball, 160 Pa.

Reedy v. Brown

16 Pa. D. & C.2d 494 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County · Jul 15, 1958

In Weber v. … In Cassidy v. Evans, 343 Pa. 483 , Mr.

Brown v. Harer

3 Pa. D. & C.2d 525 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County · Apr 20, 1955

Clyde Brown, and an answer filed by W. Clyde Harer, one of the defendants, the latter setting forth that he is not opposing the granting of the judgment. … See Johnston’s Estate, *528 33 Pa. 511 (1859); Rhoads v. The Hoernerstown Building & Savings Association, 82 Pa. 180 (1876); Fort Pitt B. & L. Association v. Model Plan B. & L. Association, 159 Pa. 308 (1893).

Nicolaides v. Brown

41 Pa. D. & C. 541 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 29, 1941

Pennsylvania adopted the New York rule stated in Mack v. Patchin, 42 N. … Kille, 97 Pa. 120 ; Einfeld v. Shermer, supra, at page 12. But cf. Minnich v. Kauffman, 265 Pa. 321, 323 .

Ressler v. Brown

41 Pa. D. & C. 176 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montour County · Mar 18, 1941

Ressler, executor of the estate of Joel Rea-buck, deceased, v. William O. Brown and Emma E. Brown for the sum of $4,400. … Ressler, Executor of the Estate of Joel Reabuck, deceased, v. William O. Brown and Emma E. Brown in the sum of $4400.”

Brown v. Post

6 Rob. 111 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jul 15, 1868

(Graves v. Dash, 12 John. 19 . Denston v. Henderson, 13 id. 322. De Rham v. Grove, 18 Abb. 43 . Story’s Confl. of Laws, §§ 309, 311. Cash v. Kennion, 11 Ves. 314. Grant v. Healey, 3 Sumn. 523 . Smith v. Shaw, 2 Wash. C. … S. 174,) Rodes v. Bronson, ( 34 N. Y. Rep. 649 ,) and Murray v. Harrison, ( 47 Barb. 484 ; 45 id. 579, 618 ,) would have been applicable.

Brown v. Richardson

4 Rob. 603 · The Superior Court of New York City · May 27, 1865

(Richards v. Walton, 12 John. 434 . Cruikshank v. Gardner, 2 Hill, 333 . Sheldon v. Quinlen, 5 id. 441 . Harman v. Brotherson, 1 Denio, 537 . Smith v. Huestis, Hill & Den. Sup. 236. Moulton v. Norton, 5 Barb. 286 .) … (Bate v. Fellowes, 4 Bosw. 638 .)

Spohn v. Brown

26 Pa. D. & C. 527 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County · Apr 6, 1936

The matter is before us on appeal from the decision and action of the board. … The opinion in the case of Bucher v.

Saar v. Brown & Odabashian, P. C.

139 Misc. 2d 328 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1988

directed disclosure only of area of expertise]; Hamilton v Wein, 132 Misc 2d 1023 [party required to disclose expert’s educational background, extent of education, speciality, number of years of practice and board certification … ]; Dunn v Medina Mem.