Case law

Commonwealth v. Brown

18 Pa. D. & C. 717 · Dauphin County Court of Quarter Sessions · Oct 24, 1932

In the case of Com. v. Kekic, 26 Dauph. Co. … In the case of Com. v.

Brown v. Rawson

23 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 105 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Jul 15, 1920

In Tabler v. … Bernard, v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

4 Pa. D. & C.2d 42 · Lycoming County Court of Quarter Sessions · Aug 11, 1955

Similarly, in Commonwealth v. Lesher, 2 Dist. … See Montgomery v. Martin, 294 Pa. 25 ; Orlosky v. Haskell, 304 Pa. 57 ; Commonwealth ex rel. Margiotti v. Lawrence et al., 326 Pa. 526 ; In re Portunodo Est. 20 Pa. C. C. 209.

Johnson v. Brown

31 N.H. 405 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Jul 15, 1855

It Was so held in Palmer v. Carlisle, 1 Simons & Stuart 433, and in Lowe v. Morgan, 1 Brockenborough’s C. C. Rep. 268. … In Poignard v.

Brown v. Sceggell

22 N.H. 548 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Jul 15, 1851

Russell v. Perry, 14 N. H. 155. … H- v. S-, 4 N. H. 60.

Brown v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

108 Misc. 384 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1919

Ill, 159, whereby the owner of the ship and its appurtenances is liable to the extent of the value thereof, for damages to another ship, means whatever is on board of the ship, for the object of the voyage and adventure for … Brown v. Carkeek, 14 Wash. 443 ; 44 Pac. Repr. 887. A chronometer is to be regarded as appurtenant to a ship. The Frolic, 148 Fed. Repr. 921, citing Abbott Merchant Ships & Seamen (14th ed.), 33, 280; Richardson v.

Brown v. Payson

6 N.H. 443 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Dec 15, 1833

Grammar; 7 East, 358, Spenceley v. Schulenburg, and note ; 4 D. & E. 431, Cobden v. Kenrick ; 2 Swanston, 216, Parkhust v. Lauton ; 13 Johns. 492 , Yordan v. Hess; 19 Johns. 134 , Johnson v. … In Brard v.

Brown v. Farr

26 Ohio C.C. Dec. 662 · Lucas Circuit Court · Feb 10, 1912

Brown upon two causes of action set forth in her petition. In the first *663 cause of action she claimed a balance of $5.50 upon a promissory note executed by Brown to her. … See Jackson v. Ely, 57 Ohio St. 450 [ 49 N. E. 792 ]; Cassilly v. Cassilly, 57 Ohio St. 582 [ 49 N. E. 795 ].

Power v. Brown

15 Ohio C.C. Dec. 420 · Cuyahoga Circuit Court · Nov 30, 1903

The case of Burckhardt v. Burckhardt, 36 Ohio St. 261 , is in point. That was a suit brought by one who had sold the property and good will to his partner in the business of the copartnership. … The case of Courcier v. Graham, 1 Ohio 330 , is also in point. The opinion, which is by Judge Hitchcock, is exhaustive and the reasoning is *423 sound.

Smith v. Brown

1 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 195 · Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · Apr 10, 1902

In Craig v. Chambers, 11 O. … In Tefft v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

65 Pa. D. & C. 284 · Delaware County Court of Oyer and Terminer · Sep 17, 1947

In accord with the said order your petitioners have attempted to prepare and conduct the defense of the said Harry Brown. “4. … It is clear that a person admittedly insane cannot be legally tried for a criminal offense: Commonwealth v. Ragone, 317 Pa. 113 (1935) ; Commonwealth v. Scovern, 292 Pa. 26 (1928).

Brown v. City School District

104 Misc. 2d 796 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1980

(Wisconsin v Yoder, 406 US 205, 213-214 .) … (Board of Educ. v Barnette, 319 US 624 .) In the case at bar, no "grave and immediate danger” was shown. Mr.

Commonwealth v. Brown

42 Pa. D. & C.2d 95 · Centre County Court of Quarter Sessions · Nov 3, 1966

Defendants Brown and Isaac were brought to trial before a jury on June 17, 1965. … Superior Ct. 399 (1936); Commonwealth v. Watson, 16 D. & C. 2d 190 (1958); Commonwealth v. Pitchcuskie, 35 Northumb. 17 (1962).

Commonwealth v. Brown

22 Pa. D. & C.2d 509 · Columbia County Court of Quarter Sessions · Aug 4, 1958

Caroline Brown, a widow 76 years of age, lives with a grandson, aged 20, in the Borough of Berwick, who is presently paying her $20 per month, on account of his room and board. … Goldman v. Goldman, 180 Pa.

Berry v. Brown

5 N.H. 156 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Feb 15, 1830

Rep. 96 , Bott v. Burnell. … Rep. 622 , Bailey v. March ; 3 N. H. Rep. 274 . Judgment on the verdict.

Commonwealth v. Brown

11 Pa. D. & C. 653 · Berks County Court of Quarter Sessions · May 14, 1928

Brown or any one else; and that, thus lacking any endorsement, it was impossible for the defendant, Robert P. Brown, thereby to prejudice the right of the Reading National Bank. *654 4. … See Com. v. Beamish, 81 Pa. 389 ; Com. v. Luberg, 94 Pa. 85 ; Com. v. Meads, No. 2, 14 York Leg. Record, 132 .

State v. Brown

15 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 401 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Jan 15, 1914

On the 6th day of April, 1907, the defendants, Brown, Long and Segal, were jointly indicted by the grand jury for criminal libel. … Gohen, the clerk of the board of deputy state supervisors and inspectors of elections in and for Hamilton county (commonly called the board of elections) and there is set out in full the alleged libel which it is claimed

Brown v. Town of Henrietta

118 Misc. 2d 133 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1983

Brown was issued an appearance ticket to appear before Town Justice Frederick Boracco on September 2, 1981. Brown appeared, entered a plea of not guilty and the matter was adjourned. … (Singleton v New York, 632 F2d 185,193; Lewis v Counts, 81 AD2d 857 ; Hollender v Trump Vil. Coop., 84 AD2d 574 .) The dismissal in the “furtherance of justice” is another matter.

Brown v. Utica Mutual Insurance

184 Misc. 693 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1945

S. v. Underwriters Assn. ( 322 U. S. 533 ) that interstate insurance business is governed by the Sherman Antitrust Act, and in Polish Alliance v. Labor Board ( 322 U. … (Watson v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co., 169 F. 942, 945 , affd. 223 U. S. 745 ; vide Chicago B. & Q. R. Co. v. Board of Sup’rs. 182 F. 291, 300 ; Hawes v. Contra Costa Water Co., Fed. Cas. No. 6,235, affd. 104 U.

Brown v. Ginn

31 Ohio C.C. Dec. 1 · Cuyahoga Circuit Court · Apr 11, 1907

In coming to this conclusion it is not necessary to adopt the reasoning of the court of common pleas entirely, nor is it necessary to adopt the reasoning of the case of Morrison v. … In short the rule should have been adopted which is given in Miami Export Co. v.