Case law

Foot v. Brown

8 Johns. 64 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1811

In the case of Poe v. Mendford, (Cro.

State v. Brown

26 Del. 499 · New York Court of General Session of the Peace · Oct 25, 1912

State v. Tindal, 5 Harr. 488 (1854); State v. Friedman, 3 Penn. 403 ; State v. Hartnett, 7 Penn. 204; State v. … Brown, 121 Mass. 69 ; Watson v. State, 9 Tex. App. 237; Frazer v. People, 54 Barb. (N. Y.) 306; Commonwealth v. Wood, 11 Gray (Mass.) 85 ; Commonwealth v.

People v. Brown

9 Misc. 3d 420 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 14, 2005

She testified that in her opinion, from comparing the two profiles, the defendant, Michael Brown, was the source of the male DNA from the sexual assault kit sent to Bode Technology. … (People v Diaz, 21 AD3d at 64 .)

Brown v. Brown

1 Pa. D. & C. 173 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County · Jul 2, 1921

In Liem v. … In Kuhn v. Kuhn. 65 Pitts. L.

Posson v. Brown

11 Johns. 166 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1814

As the judgment obtained before the other justice, (Hoes,) in favour of Posson against Brown, was given in evidence, it is most probable that the present suit was brought to recover back the money recovered of the plaintiff

Osgood v. Brown

1 Free. Ch. 392 · Mississippi Chancery Courts · Jul 1, 1844

Rochelle v. Campbell and Chambers, 1 McChord’s Ch. Rep. 53. In the case of the Bank of Orange County v. … See Underhill v. Van Courtlandt, 2 John. Ch. Rep. 339; Cable v. Martin, 1 How. Rep. 558 .

Brown v. Hinchman

9 Johns. 75 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1812

Brown v. Brown

4 Rob. 688 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jun 30, 1866

(Van Dyne v. Thayre, 19 Wend. 162 . *701 Cooper v. Whitney, 3 Hill, 95 . Balter v. Chase, 6 id. 482. Runyan v. Stewart, 12 Barb. 537 .) … Bank of Utica v. City of Utica, 4 Paige, 399 . Ludlow v. Simond, 2 Caine’s Cas. 1. Truscott v. King, 6 N. Y. Rep. 147 .)

Brown v. Ward

9 How. Pr. 497 · The Superior Court of New York City · May 15, 1854

The pledgee then caused the stock to be offered at the board of brokers, where he offered it at the rate of fifty-three per cent., which he could not get. … Hamilton in the superior court, and others, were referred to as deciding that a sale at the board of brokers of stock pledged could not be made without an express stipulation to that effect; and that a sale to be valid must

Brown v. Cuming

2 Cai. Cas. 33 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1804

In Freeman v. … In Howlett v. Strickland, Cowp. 56.

Brown v. Wigton

18 N.Y.S. 490 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1892

The rule is well stated in the case of Lowenstein v. Salinger, (Sup.) 17 N. Y.

Brown v. Wilde

12 Johns. 455 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1815

Reid v. Brown

54 Misc. 481 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1907

Brown, deceased: “ V. I give and bequeath to Antoinette Marsh Reid, wife, of Willard 0. … Matter of Cocks, 5 Redf. 406, 414 ; Lang v. Ropke, 5 Sandf. 363 , ,370; Hawley v. James, 16 Wend. 60 ; Griffen v. Ford, 1 Bosw. 123, 143, 144 ; Maurice v. Graham, 8 Paige, 484 , 487; Hunter v.

Brown v. McCune

5 Sandf. 224 · The Superior Court of New York City · Nov 15, 1851

We believe the law remains as it was laid down in Johnson v. Pie, 1 Kel. 905 and 913 (S. … It is stated in that case that the same point was held the previous term, in the case of Grove v. Nevil.

Moir v. Brown

14 Barb. 39 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1852

(Small v. Marwood, 9 B. & C. 300. Nicholson v. Woodworth, 2 Swanst, 365. 21 Vin. 535. Hill on Trustees, 225. And see Johnson v. Fleet, 14 Wend. 176 ; Crewe v. Dicken, 4 Ves. 97; Adams v. Taunton, 5 Madd. 435.) … (See Cooper v. Smith, 15 East, 103; 1 Sug. V. and P. ch., 3, § 3; Jackson v. Titus, 2 John. 430 ; First B. Ch. &c. v. Bigelow, 16 Wend. 28 ; Winsor v. Pratt, 2 B. & B. 650; Kenworthy v. Scofield, 2 B. & C. 945; Smart v.

Brown v. Smith

132 Misc. 2d 686 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1985

On August 9, 1984, petitioner Ronald Brown was subjected to a disciplinary hearing at the Attica Correctional Facility. … Corcoran v Smith, 105 AD2d 1142 [1984]). The record also indicates that an incomplete foundation was laid for the hearing officer’s acceptance of the test results.

Brown v. Bennett

5 Cow. 181 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1825

(Sayre v. Earl of Rochford, 2 W. Bl. 1165. Garth. 280. 2 Chit. Pl. 643, note,(t) (u). 5 Com. Dig. Pleader, (F. 18.) He cannot give it in evidence under the general replication *186 of de injuria. In Collier v. … King et ux. v. Peppard, Comb. 227.

Brown v. Cady

19 Wend. 477 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1838

People v. Brown

174 Misc. 2d 941 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1997

(See, e.g., People v Griffin, 171 Misc 2d 145, 149 [Sup Ct, NY County 1996] [offender’s duty to register did not attach when the execution of judgment and sentence had been stayed and the defendant had been released on bail … (Compare, People v Roberson, 172 Misc 2d 486, 488 [Sup Ct, Erie County 1997] [statute does not apply to offender sentenced to a maximum prison term of 15 years in 1976; subsequent sentences in 1982 and 1987 did not extend

Brown v. Lyons

43 Ohio Misc. 14 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Nov 12, 1974