Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.75s
Board of Education v. Board of Education
18 Ct. Cl. 34 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 19, 1990
Board of Education for the County of Grant and Board of Education for the County of Ritchie vs. Honorable A. James Manchin, Treasurer of the State of West Virginia; Glen B. … Award of $1,295,340.60 to Grant County Board of Education. Award of $396,636.00 to Ritchie County Board of Education.
Cited 0 timesPublished20 Misc. 2d 908 · New York County Courts · Aug 10, 1959
This is an action brought by Dorothy Brown, a widow, individually and as guardian ad litem for her children Robert Brown and Dennis Brown against Broome County, to recover damages on the claim that one of the coroners of … This cause of action arose out of an incident which happened on the 10th day of February, 1958 when one Francis Brown, the deceased husband of the plaintiff Dorothy Brown, was found *909 dead in the Delaware and Hudson Railroad
Cited 1 timesPublishedCommunity School Board v. Board of Education
66 Misc. 2d 739 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1971
This is a motion for a preliminary injunction brought by Community School Board, District 3 of the School District of the City of New York (Community School Board) its members, and several parents against the Board of Education … [d]) is read as a whole and the different roles of the Community Board, Chancellor and City Board are analyzed. First, only the Community School Board is given the right to submit proposals for the use of Title I funds.
Cited 2 timesPublished20 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 385 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Feb 15, 1918
of Brown. … Co. v. Thompson, reported in 82 Fed., 720 .
Cited 0 timesPublished43 Misc. 3d 715 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 13, 2014
(Franco v Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, Ltd., 103 AD3d 543 [1st Dept 2013]; Pavane v Marte, 109 AD3d 970 [2d Dept 2013]; Vetrano v J. … (Francisco v Schoepfer, 30 AD3d 275 [1st Dept 2006]; Mullen v Rigor, 8 AD3d 104 [1st Dept 2004]; Malone v Morillo, 6 AD3d 324 [1st Dept 2004]; Singh v Sanders, 286 AD2d 256 [1st Dept 2001]; Mitchell v Gonzalez, 269 AD2d 250
Cited 0 timesPublished64 Va. Cir. 349 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Apr 8, 2004
See e.g., Emrich v. Emrich, 9 Va. App. 288, 291-93, 387 S.E.2d 274 (1989); cf. Levine v. … Cooper v. Davis, 199 Va. 472, 476 , 100 S.E.2d 691 (1957).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Erie-Lackawanna Railroad
54 Misc. 2d 225 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1967
Feathers v. … Further, as the court stated in Longines-Wittnauer v.
Cited 1 timesPublished43 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 642 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1885
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text33 Fla. Supp. 2d 130 · Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · Mar 28, 1989
Stat. 316.1932(l)(a) (1987), South Dakota v Neville, 459 U.S. 553 , 103 S.Ct. 916 , 74 L.Ed.2d 748 (1983), Minor v Williams, 640 F.Supp. 360 (M.D. Tenn 1985).
Cited 0 timesPublished38 Fla. Supp. 2d 21 · Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · Aug 14, 1989
In Clark v State, 363 So.2d 331, 335 (Fla. 1978), it was held that: [wjhen there is an improper comment, the defendant, if he is offended has the obligation to object and to request a mistrial. . . . … The rule of Clark was modified slightly in State v Cumbie, 380 So.2d 1031 (Fla. 1980), in which the prosecutor made improper comments during his closing argument.
Cited 0 timesPublished6 Duer 549 · The Superior Court of New York City · Mar 28, 1857
(Morris v. Wadsworth, 17 Wend. 103 .) It is quite clear, at all events, as between the plaintiff and de *562 fendant, that this $15,000 was not to be at the risk of the success of the new firm. … Brown may be liable, as a general partner, to all who have dealt with the firm. (1 R. S. 765, § 8.)
Cited 0 timesPublished12 Fla. Supp. 2d 132 · Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · Apr 11, 1985
Seaboard Airline Railroad Company v. Strickland, 88 So.2d 519 (Fla. 1956). In Byrd v. … Seaboard Airline Railroad Company v. Strickland, supra.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Supervisors v. Board of Supervisors
6 Va. Cir. 516 · Lancaster County Circuit Court · Apr 7, 1977
Such reasonable costs were fixed by the Board of Supervisors of Northumberland County at $8.00 per prisoner day. … It seems to me that a reasonable interpretation of this action by Northumberland’s Board is simply to charge other counties $8.00 per prisoner day for the other county’s prisoners and that room and board for Lancaster’s prisoners
Cited 0 timesPublished33 Fla. Supp. 2d 130 · Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · Mar 28, 1989
Stat. 316.1932(l)(a) (1987), South Dakota v Neville, 459 U.S. 553 , 103 S.Ct. 916 , 74 L.Ed.2d 748 (1983), Minor v Williams, 640 F.Supp. 360 (M.D. Tenn 1985).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict 27 Community School Board v. Board of Education
130 Misc. 2d 398 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1986
V The petitioners rely on various provisions of the New York City Health Code to support their contention that the Commissioner of Health and Chancellor of the Board of Education are required by law to exclude any AIDS/ARC … However, once the State, like New York, chooses to provide public education (NY Const, art 11, § 1), the right to an education "must be made available to all on equal terms” (Brown v Board of Educ., 347 US 483, 493 [1954]
Cited 19 timesPublished61 Va. Cir. 479 · Virginia Circuit Court · Apr 21, 2003
It was established by the case of Weston’s Adm’x v. Hospital of St. Vincent of Paul, 131 Va. 587 , 107 S.E. 785 (1921). … Moore, etc. v. Warren, 250 Va. 421, 423 , 463 S.E.2d 459 (1995). Admittedly Moore does not discuss gross negligence, as compared with simple negligence, but applies the Weston rule to agents and servants.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Board of Education
10 Ohio C.C. 617 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1895
, and that the expenses should be paid out of the school funds of the sending board. … That done, the" board must permit the pupils to attend; and the board of the district where the pupils reside must pay for it.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Commissioners v. Board of Commissioners
12 Ohio C.C. 563 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Sep 15, 1896
The statute provides: — ■ Sec.3,“if said board of freeholders shall not be able to agree upon the amount to be paid by said upper county to said lower county, then they shall call to their assistance one other freeholder,
Cited 0 timesPublished13 Fla. Supp. 2d 163 · Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · Sep 26, 1985
BROWN, M.D. and FRED D. BROWN, M.D.P.A. seek in the alternative to sever the action and to transfer the cause against them to Okeechobee County, Florida. … See Bassett v. Talquin Electric Co-op, Inc., 362 So.2d 357 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). 4.
Cited 0 timesPublished29 Fla. Supp. 2d 39 · Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · Mar 14, 1988
Brown could take care of Mr. Robar’s partner. However, Mr. Robar *40 cannot remember what was said by Mrs. Scott as opposed to Mr. Brown. Mrs. … As the Third District Court of Appeal said in Paul v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna