Case law

Brown v. Market Development, Inc.

41 Ohio Misc. 57 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Feb 21, 1974

Brown, Attorney General of the state of Ohio, brought this action under R. … New Mexico Board of Examiners in Optometry [1963], 374 U. S. 424 ). Motion to dismiss denied.

Commonwealth v. Brown

20 Va. Cir. 472 · Sussex County Circuit Court · Aug 22, 1990

The purpose of §§ 46.2-351 to 46.2-355 of the Code of Virginia is clearly stated in Huffman v. Commonwealth, *473 210 Va. 530 (1970): "for the protection of the public in removing from the highways a dangerous driver." … The purpose of § 46.2-402 of the Code of Virginia as stated in Lamb v. Rubin, 198 Va. 628 (1957) [is] "to protect the public in the use of the highways . . . ."

Brown v. Hobart Corp.

57 Va. Cir. 269 · Virginia Circuit Court · Jan 8, 2002

In support of their respective motions for summary judgment, the Defendants have relied upon Logan v. … Jeld-Wen, Inc. v. Gamble, 256 Va. 144, 148 , 501 S.E.2d 393, 396 (1998).

Commonwealth v. Brown

36 Pa. D. & C.3d 474 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County · Oct 17, 1985

Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Tillitt, 49 Pa.Commw. 343, 346, 411 A.2d 276, 277 *476 (1980). (Emphasis in original.) … Wisniewski v. Commonwealth, 73 Pa. Commw. 318 , 457 A.2d 1334 (1983).

Commonwealth v. Brown

60 Pa. D. & C.2d 382 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County · Jun 28, 1972

BLOOM, J., Defendant, William Wayne Brown, was convicted by a jury for possession of narcotics and dangerous drugs. … A hearing was held on February 15, 1972, before Judge John V. Diggins with respect to the defendant’s application for P.I.P.P.

Van Arsdale v. Brown

18 Ohio C.C. 52 · Ohio Circuit Courts · May 15, 1899

An authority to this fact is the case of Lewis v. Tipton, 10 Ohio St., 88 . … We have had occasion to discuss this question in the case of Ashley v. Walker, 15 C. C., 660.

Brown v. St. John

4 Ohio Cir. Dec. 155 · Ottawa Circuit Court · Jun 15, 1894

Brown being the wife of Jeremiah Brown) for the foreclosure of the mortgage above mentioned. … It may not be material in the case of Baldwin v. Sheets, supra. Our conclusion is that the judgment should be affirmed.

Brown v. Safeguard Insurance

7 Abb. Pr. 345 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1858

Brown v. Macgill

1 Balt. C. Rep. 663 · Baltimore City Circuit Court · Jun 23, 1897

Macgill, executed to Alexander Brown, the i)lain-tiff, a promissory note for $2,000, for money loaned, the said note being payable on demand.

Brown v. Wallace

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 1 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jul 1, 1901

Browne, has given bond in this court as such assignee, and is entitled to such appeal without giving bond.” It would be enough to rest our decision upon the case of Willis v. … The supreme court of Wisconsin, in Eaton v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

11 Pa. D. & C.4th 325 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County · May 13, 1991

ARD was offered to defendant because he agreed to testify against a co-defendant at a time when defendant had insisted that he v/as not an active participant of the theft. … As the Superior Court wrote in Commonwealth v. Wright, 354 Pa.

Wells v. Brown

61 Pa. D. & C. 511 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Oct 2, 1947

In the lower courts we have found but one case in which personal property was involved, that of Reitz v. Reitz, 56 York 79 (1942). … EDITOR’S NOTE: But see Barrett v. Barrett, 62 D. & C. 362.

Harry v. Brown

8 Pa. D. & C.4th 628 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Greene County · Jan 15, 1991

Alumni Association v. Sullivan, 523 Pa. 356 , 572 A.2d 1209 (1990); Manning v. Andy, 454 Pa. 237 , 310 A.2d 75 (1973). Instead, the Liquor Code applies to licensees. … Connor v. Allegheny General Hospital, 501 Pa. 306 , 461 A.2d 600 (1983). Paragraph 15(d) is also the subject of a motion for a more specific pleading by Tracy Brown.

Brown & Eaton v. Torrance

1 How. Pr. 26 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1844

Brown v. Industrial Commission

16 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 160 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · May 16, 1914

The plaintiff, David Brown, alleges that on or about the 12th day of August, 1913, he was employed by the Eagle White Lead *161 Company, of Cincinnati, which was a contributor to the state insurance fund under the workmen … which he was required to work, was entitled to compensation, the phrase personal injuries, and injuries, being broad enough in their signification to include the injury in question. ” In the more recent case of Johnson v.

Van Arsdale v. Brown

9 Ohio Cir. Dec. 488 · Fulton Circuit Court · Jul 1, 1899

An authority to this fact is the case of Tewis v. Tipton, 10 O. S., 88. The court say in that case on page 90 •. … We have had occasion to discuss this question'in the case of Ashley v. Walker, 8 Ohio Circ. Dec., 285.

Brown v. Smith

2 Balt. C. Rep. 297 · Baltimore City Circuit Court · Jan 7, 1904

Whitridge, and the bequest of $20,000 to Harriet and Bessie Brown, are valid, and that the balance of the estate must pass under the provisions of the will of George Brown. … Whitridge and Alexander Brown, being such, are entitled to the property held in trust for Mrs. Greenway under the will of Grace Brown. I will sign a decree in conformity with this opinion.

Brown v. Rishel

7 Pa. D. & C.3d 758 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County · Mar 15, 1978

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Education, 453 Pa. 584 , 305 A. 2d 877 (1973), abolished the doctrine of governmental immunity. Thus, in Laughlin v. Pittsburgh, 226 Pa. … In Jackson v.

Brown v. Summerfield

4 Balt. C. Rep. 523 · Baltimore City Circuit Court · Dec 14, 1926

Brown (Seal) Rósala Brown (Seal) E. P. Summerfield (Seal) Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of (Signed) Willis R. Jones.” “This agreement made this 17th day of April, 1926, between Nicholas K. Brown and E. P. … Brown to release Mr. Brown from their respective claims and that Mr.

Brown v. Hoggson Bros.

18 Pa. D. & C. 336 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County · Mar 2, 1932

Brown, sued defendant, Hoggson Brothers, a corporation, for damages sustained by reason of a particle lodging in her eye as she walked past a building operation then under construction by defendant. … In Ellett v. Lit Brothers, Inc., 27 Dist.