Case law

Hill v. Brown

237 S.W. 252 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 8, 1922

V. Brown, joined by her husband, as plaintiffs, against J. H. Hill and wife as defendants, in the district court of Dallas county. … Watson v. Sutherland, 5 Wall. 74 ; North v. Peters, 133 U. S. 271 .

Comer v. Brown

285 S.W. 307 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 16, 1926

Frank v. Tatum, 87 Tex. 204 , 25 S. W. 409 ; McManus v. Cash, 101 Tex. 261 , 108 S. W. 800 ; Fowler Commission Co. v. Land (Tex. Com. App.) 248 S. W. 314 ; Glasscock v. Price, 92 Tex. 271 , 47 S. W. 965 . … Now, the case of Hickman v. Swain does not hold otherwise.

Brown v. Fore

12 S.W.2d 114 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 2, 1929

Peake v. Ledger, 8 Hare, 313; Crane v. Howell, 35 N. J. Eq. 374; McGregor v. McGregor, 35 N. Y. 218 ; Smith v. Lawrence, 11 Paige, 206 ; 1 Pomeroy, Eq. Jur. § 51. … Rollison v. Hope, 18 Tex. 446 ; White v. Downs, 40 Tex. 236 . The rights with which F. M.

Brown v. Fleming

212 S.W. 483 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 28, 1919

Brown, in his capacity as administrator of the estate of C. R. … In Johnson v.

Fink v. Brown

215 S.W. 846 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Nov 12, 1919

The Cothran Case was not in point, and doubtless for this reason is not referred to by Judge Brown in the opinion on certificate. … Freeman v. Huttig; Cothran v. Marmaduke et al.; Buzard v. Bank, supra; Carhart v. Brown, 86 Tex. 425 , 25 S. W. 415 ; Beecher v. Bush, 45 Mich. 188 , 7 N. W. 785 , 40 Am. Rep. 465 ; Austin v. Neil, 62 N. J.

Andrews v. Brown

10 S.W.2d 707 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Nov 21, 1928

Brown to W. A. and S. H. Brown, conveying what had been left in the grantor by the 1917 deed. Hendrix v. Nunn, 46 Tex. 141 ; 1 Perry on Trusts and Trustees (6th Ed.) §§ 166, 189, 190; 20 R. C. L. 1236; 35 A. L. R. 286. … Brown (when he made the deed and subsequently) was subject to undue influence, etc. This is true, because the estate of N. H. Brown was in the minerals as severed (and not in the land as a whole, as in Swayne v.

Knox v. Brown

277 S.W. 91 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Nov 4, 1925

Revised Statutes of 1925, art. 2209— 2211; Ablowich v. Bank, 95 Tex. 431 , 67 S. W. 79, 881 ; Clark & Loftus v. Pearce, 80 Tex. 151 , 15 S. W. 787 ; W. U. Telegraph Co. v. Mitchell, 89 Tex. 444 , 35 S. W. 4 . … Beard v. Gooch, 62 Tex. Civ. App. 69 , 130 S. W. 1022 ; Adams v. Hughes (Tex. Civ. App.) 140 S. W. 1163 ; Gardner v. Sittig (Tex. Com. App.) 222 S. W. 1090 ; James on Options, § 822.

Brown v. Ackerman

17 S.W.2d 771 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 5, 1929

Holmes v. Buckner, 67 Tex. 107 , 2 S. W. 452 ; Lumpkin v. Adams, 74 Tex. 102 , 11 S. W. 1070 ; Peterson v. McCauley (Tex. Civ. App.) 25 S. *772 W. 826 ; Gamble v. Martin (Tex. Civ. App.) 151 S.

Knox v. Brown

16 S.W.2d 262 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 24, 1929

As said in Lee v. International, etc., Ry. Co., 89 Tex. 588 , 36 S. … Miller v. Ytur-ria, 69 Tex. 549 , 7 S.

Brown v. Searls

228 S.W. 173 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 2, 1921

Brown against John W.. Searls to recover damages growing out of a contract under which Brown conveyed a-tract of land to Searls in exchange for a stock of merchandise owned by the latter. … pounded to the jury requiring a finding upon the issue of fraud or the value of the land conveyed by plaintiff, the latter being a necessary element in estimating the damage in an action for deceit under the rule in George v.

Buvens v. Brown

290 S.W. 1086 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 9, 1927

In the ease of McCarthy v. Houston Oil Co., of Texas, 221 S. … Berry v. Donley, 26 Tex. 743 ; Veeder v. Gilmer, 103 Tex. 458 , 129 S. W. 595 ; Holland v. Votaw, 62 Tex. Civ. App. 91 , 130 S. W. 882 (writ of error refused and opinion by Supreme Court, 103 Tex. 534 , 131 S. W. 406 ).

Neyland v. Brown

172 S.W.2d 89 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 9, 1943

McAfee v. Travis Gas Corporation, 137 Tex. 314 , 153 S.W.2d 442 ; Chalmers v. Gumm, 137 Tex. 467 , 154 S.W.2d 640 ; Johnson v. Wood, 138 Tex. 106 , 157 S.W.2d 146 ; Le Master v. … Texas Employer’s Insurance Ass’n v. Lightfoot, 139 Tex. 304 , 162 S.W.2d 929 ; Phœnix Assurance Co. v. Stobaugh, 127 Tex. 308 , 94 S.W.2d 428 .

Rice v. Brown

296 S.W. 495 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jun 25, 1927

See, also, Stanley v. Westrop, 16 Tex. 204 ; Phillips v. Herndon, 78 Tex. 378 , 14 S. W. 857 , 22 Am. St. Rep. 59 . … Cooley v. Miller (Tex. Com. App.) 228 S. W. 1085 .”

Lumpkin v. Brown

229 S.W. 498 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 30, 1921

Brown, sued A. A. Lumpkin, administrator of the estate of Chas. R. … Russell v.

Webb v. Brown

2 Posey 36 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Nov 15, 1880

See Urquhart v. Burleson, 6 Tex., 511 ; Bass Mitchell, 22 Tex., 294 ; Mitchell v. Burdett, id., 535; Booth v. Strippleman, 26 Tex., 442 ; Bolton v. Lann, 16 Tex., 111 ; McCown v. Hill, 26 Tex., 361 ; Castleman v. … Chapman, 1 Root, 528 ; Morris v. Owens, 3 Strobhart (S. C.), 199; Steiner v. Baughman, 2 Jones (Pa.), 106; Pecare v. Chouteau, 13 Missouri, 527; Hall v. Mayhew, 15 Md., 551 ; Wright v. Wright, 34 Ala., 194 ; Beal v.

McMurtry v. Brown

228 S.W. 1087 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 30, 1921

V. Brown, filed a motion to dismiss the writ of error, basing his motion upon the ground that the judgment had been compromised and settled and a release executed by him.

Montgomery v. Brown

1 White & W. 755 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jul 1, 1883

Brown Express, Inc. v. Arnold

138 Tex. 70 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Dec 10, 1941

Henderson Grain Co. v. Russ, 122 Tex. 620 , 64 S.W.2d 347 . Obviously, if Brown Express, Inc., committed a trespass in Comal County against Arnold it did so only because of some positive act committed by Walker. … It is equally true that no positive act of Walker’s could be regarded as that of Brown Express, Inc., unless in committing the same he was acting in the course of his employment by it. Gordon v. T. & P. Mer. & Mfg.

Brown v. City Service Co.

245 S.W. 656 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Dec 6, 1922

Agency Co. v. McClelland Bros., 86 Tex. 188 , 23 S. W. 576, 1100 , 22 L. R. A. 105. … The rule for testing the probative force of the evidence announced by the court, through Chief Justice Brown, in the case of Wininger v. Railway, 105 Tex. 56 , 143 S.

Beacon Lumber Co. v. Brown

14 S.W.2d 1022 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 20, 1929

Co. v. U. S., 272 U. S. 533 , 47 S. Ct. 188 , 71 L. Ed. 394 . … Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U. S. 27 , 5 S. Ct. 357 , 28 L. Ed. 923 ; Stone v. City of Jefferson, 317 Mo. 1 , 293 S. W. 780 , 52 A. L. R. 879; Virginia Development Co. v. Crozer Iron Co., 90 Va. 126 , 17 S. E. 806 , 44 Am.